I think it’s more like comparing Kohli to Michael Clarke.I mean that’s true when the difference is say between averaging 26 and 30 - but 19 and 31? There’s no way the two records are comparable, regardless of what reasoning you use.
That’s like saying Root’s record is comparable to Ian Bell. Both great cricketers but one is undoubtably better than the other.
Way more factors to take into account than simply a bowling average.
Brett Lee won a ODI World Cup, two ICC Champions Trophies and three Ashes series and is the 4th most successful Australian bowler of all time. Saying Bumrah is on a different stratosphere and by far a better bowler is just wrong.