• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Look North. Again.

I like BR, but have never understood why he continually calls for Harry Kane to retire from International football
 

He has a go at confronting the issues, but I don't agree with these bits:

"It is important to recognise none of this is the fault of Newcastle’s supporters."

"Again, football supporters are essentially bystanders in this, victims of the process, forced to make a series of impossible choices."



The mags absolutely, emphatically chose this. Really irritates me that they get completely off the hook for their behaviour.
Aye I know quite a few Mags who regularly demonise Trump supporters and Reform voters who fully embraced this takeover with open arms and won't hear a word said against their ownership despite the Saudi government being an extremely authoritarian, right-wing regime or the way that they have turned the club into a full-on sportswashing vehicle. People like that are the absolute worst kind of Newcastle supporter.
 
Last edited:
He has a go at confronting the issues, but I don't agree with these bits:

"It is important to recognise none of this is the fault of Newcastle’s supporters."

"Again, football supporters are essentially bystanders in this, victims of the process, forced to make a series of impossible choices."



The mags absolutely, emphatically chose this. Really irritates me that they get completely off the hook for their behaviour.


This bit is good - hope his journalist colleagues who it is addressed to pay some attention:

"Blindly cheerleading journalism is undoubtedly a route to popularity, clicks, affirmation. But it also represents complicity in the process."
this for me as well. its got everything to do with the newcastle utd fans as over 100,000 of them signed a petition begging and pleading with the uk goverment to allow the takeover to happen.

this never gets mentioned anywhere in the press its remarkable tbh
I’d like to know what the mags that get on here think about articles like this.
they couldnt give a toss mate. all they are bothered about is days like sunday and spending billions on footballers
Excellent piece of writing from a proper journalist. The likes of Caulkin could do with reading and ruminating on what he says, and being honest with themselves.
caulkin is a mouthpiece for the saudi goverment
the picture of the saudi utd chairman holding the trophy in that piece makes me feel physically sick. the bloke is a vile piece of shit
 
Last edited:
He has a go at confronting the issues, but I don't agree with these bits:

"It is important to recognise none of this is the fault of Newcastle’s supporters."

"Again, football supporters are essentially bystanders in this, victims of the process, forced to make a series of impossible choices."



The mags absolutely, emphatically chose this. Really irritates me that they get completely off the hook for their behaviour.


This bit is good - hope his journalist colleagues who it is addressed to pay some attention:

"Blindly cheerleading journalism is undoubtedly a route to popularity, clicks, affirmation. But it also represents complicity in the process."
In Germany Klopp is public enemy no.1 for taking a job with Red Bull. How can a football man like that go and work for franchise? Supporters of Mainz and Dortmund are disgusted. Even the idea of a state sponsoring a football club has fans protesting. Football belongs to the fans, not to the global elite.

In England, there's celebrations on the streets that a dictatorship has bought a club. Even going to great lengths to get the deal done. People are praising a man who is wanted in Canada for threats against Saudi dissent and his family. Mentioned by the CIA as MBS right hand man and involved in the murder of Jamal Khashoggi and the purge in 2017. Oh, and good buddies with Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin.

Sad times.
 
He has a go at confronting the issues, but I don't agree with these bits:

"It is important to recognise none of this is the fault of Newcastle’s supporters."

"Again, football supporters are essentially bystanders in this, victims of the process, forced to make a series of impossible choices."



The mags absolutely, emphatically chose this. Really irritates me that they get completely off the hook for their behaviour.


This bit is good - hope his journalist colleagues who it is addressed to pay some attention:

"Blindly cheerleading journalism is undoubtedly a route to popularity, clicks, affirmation. But it also represents complicity in the process."
Let be fair in our own way we all do the same.

Who buys, fair trade coffee or chocolate? Primary, Nick & Adidas all have link to child labour. Palm Oil forest devastation, the list goes on. Most turn a blind eye just so they can eat their favourite Chocolate.

I doubt there are many Mags out there, that wouldn't swap the Saudi's for something ethically more correct, if it would put them in a similar position as they are now. But there isn't and subsequently they're going to willfully ignore the unethical practices of the Saudi government. In much the same was as someone who would prefer to get their their fashion at an ethically more suitable place than Primark but doesn't because its more expensive and the want the extra cash for drinks in the evening.
 
I’d like to know what the mags that get on here think about articles like this.
I'd imagine they'd be upset if they could read
this for me as well. its got everything to do with the newcastle utd fans as over 100,000 of them signed a petition begging and pleading with the uk goverment to allow the takeover to happen.

this never gets mentioned anywhere in the press its remarkable tbh

they couldnt give a toss mate. all they are bothered about is days like sunday and spending billions on footballers

caulkin is a mouthpiece for the saudi goverment
the picture of the saudi utd chairman holding the trophy in that piece makes me feel physically sick. the bloke is a vile piece of shit
"Keep politics out of sport"*

*unless it's mags begging their MP to bring up a takeover in parliament.


I have no idea how this isn't mentioned more, they Saudi king bribed our prime minister to let a takeover of a football club happy. Corrupt as fuck
 
Last edited:
Let be fair in our own way we all do the same.

Who buys, fair trade coffee or chocolate? Primary, Nick & Adidas all have link to child labour. Palm Oil forest devastation, the list goes on. Most turn a blind eye just so they can eat their favourite Chocolate.

I doubt there are many Mags out there, that wouldn't swap the Saudi's for something ethically more correct, if it would put them in a similar position as they are now. But there isn't and subsequently they're going to willfully ignore the unethical practices of the Saudi government. In much the same was as someone who would prefer to get their their fashion at an ethically more suitable place than Primark but doesn't because its more expensive and the want the extra cash for drinks in the evening.
Indeed there are degrees of hypocrisy in much of modern life and it's difficult to avoid unethical organisations altogether. And when one of them happens to buy your football club it's a challenge (though if it was SAFC I wouldn't give the club a penny under their ownership). However as said above, this is a murderous regime far worse than the examples you give above, using their club to actively cleanse its image, and this was something vast swathes of NUFC supporters actively petitioned for. So it's not just something they uncomfortably tolerate - they very firmly wanted it (with a few commendable exceptions). And most of the ones I speak to moan constantly that the PSR rules stop them from fully exploiting this advantage too.
 
Last edited:
It's disgusting listen to all sports broadcasts, especially boxing, money 1st 2nd and last. Every time Spencer Oliver is on talkshite he spends most of the time telling you how fabulous it is in Saudi, clear it's rammed into him to say it
Maybe if you’re a woman suppressing homophobic individual then it is ?!?
 
Let be fair in our own way we all do the same.

Who buys, fair trade coffee or chocolate? Primary, Nick & Adidas all have link to child labour. Palm Oil forest devastation, the list goes on. Most turn a blind eye just so they can eat their favourite Chocolate.

I doubt there are many Mags out there, that wouldn't swap the Saudi's for something ethically more correct, if it would put them in a similar position as they are now. But there isn't and subsequently they're going to willfully ignore the unethical practices of the Saudi government. In much the same was as someone who would prefer to get their their fashion at an ethically more suitable place than Primark but doesn't because its more expensive and the want the extra cash for drinks in the evening.

I’ve never seen anyone make those “difficult ethical choices” and then grovel the way the mags do though. They don’t have to do that. There’s no need to buy the green Saudi kit but they do so in their thousands because they want to.

They don’t have to cheer Al Rumayyan to when he lifts the trophy on the pitch. They could all have given him a V sign and then carried on the party. That’s certainly what Man United fans would do if the Glazers appeared on the pitch with a trophy. The mags would never dream of doing that though.

Have you ever seen any other fans celebrate anything like this?

You must be logged on to see media items

The grovelling and lack of pride is entirely unique to the mags - no other set of fans has ever gone on like this. Completely shameless.
 
Back
Top