• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Tommy Watson ( ...off to Brighton)

why is watsons refusal to sign contract getting traction?there is no evidence for this ! or is there?....daft folk are adding 2 plus 2 and getting a cabbage as the sum !Is this a leak ,from the club to spin the reason for the sale?....the best young talent in the division rigg (and watsons not far behind) is getting no stories of bids or possible sale in this window and thats because the club have obviously let it known that rigg is going nowhere .........

yet we get these stories about an injured kid with potential having 12 million bids turned down until they are of course reluctantly accepted!We need to try to hold onto our best players and watson is deffo one of those! Personally i will be disappointed if he goes but if its to fund a consolidated push on promotion well sometimes you just have to accept the realities of football and the limitations of your ownership group!

If we dont get promoted and watson is bandied around fo 30-40 million in 3 or 4 years time and funding Brightoms prem consolidation i think it will be seenas a terrible decision!
Probably because he only has 18 month left. If he wanted to sign it would be fine by now…
 

No the club and the lad must have both had offers they can't refuse. Dont blame him to be honest once in a lifetime offer for him probably. Good luck to the lad
...if he goes.
The club have refused at least 3 offers for him. If the player had not told them he was not signing a new deal they would have rejected all offers.

Watson has pushed for the move
 
Seemingly this is on then, just feels like the lad is being badly advised here. Hope it works out but expect him to be out on loan come the start of next season. Very strange by the lad.
 
why is watsons refusal to sign contract getting traction?there is no evidence for this ! or is there?....daft folk are adding 2 plus 2 and getting a cabbage as the sum !Is this a leak ,from the club to spin the reason for the sale?....the best young talent in the division rigg (and watsons not far behind) is getting no stories of bids or possible sale in this window and thats because the club have obviously let it known that rigg is going nowhere .........

yet we get these stories about an injured kid with potential having 12 million bids turned down until they are of course reluctantly accepted!We need to try to hold onto our best players and watson is deffo one of those! Personally i will be disappointed if he goes but if its to fund a consolidated push on promotion well sometimes you just have to accept the realities of football and the limitations of your ownership group!

If we dont get promoted and watson is bandied around fo 30-40 million in 3 or 4 years time and funding Brightoms prem consolidation i think it will be seenas a terrible decision!
Perhaps Speakman dropped the ball with Watson over his contract. There was a big fuss made publically when Ballard (again), Jobe and Rigg were given new contracts, but Watson wasn't. That's pretty humiliating and frustrating for him if the club are telling him how much they rate him.
 
We seem to have cracked the 'selling injured players for inflated fees' market. In all fairness, if he fancies pastures new and we get a big pile of cash, that's got to be considered a win all round. It's not the ideal outcome (from my perspective), but, it'll do.

I can't help feel that this is Jack Clarke, six years ago. Ultimately, staying here and playing might be the best option, career-wise, but, becoming a millionaire aged 18 whilst injured has its appeal.
 
Back
Top