• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

That second half

ajthemackem said:
Their first was one of those goals that any team can concede, just one of those things.

Second was down to the reshuffle.

More worried about the injuries than the actual performance.

Although I didn't realise Neil was playing until he kicked off in the second half.:lol:
Click to expand...
No, the first was 09 being out of position. Wrong side of the goal scorer. That’s basic defending.
The second was the keeper not coming for a cross which came right across the six yard box. Basic goalkeeping.

Two schoolboy errors.
 

Ohnonotagain said:
No, the first was 09 being out of position. Wrong side of the goal scorer. That’s basic defending.
The second was the keeper not coming for a cross which came right across the six yard box. Basic goalkeeping.

Two schoolboy errors.
Click to expand...
Blaming O'nien ffs, Neil missed his tackle, then Brownes interception went staight to a Coventry player, but aye it was Lukes fault :lol: :lol:
 
Chewit said:
Reid’s team would not have failed to kill off the last 3 games, simply because of experience and squad depth.
We have fantastic quality but not necessarily players at their peak.
When you consider the 4 strikers Reid had only Bridges was ‘learning’ the game but was one season from tearing up the premiership.
Look at the experience of Quinn, Clark, Ball, Melville,
Soon to be Internationals Gray, Phillips.
At their peak Johnstone, Makin, Rae
Not to mention Sorensen in goal and proven goalscorer Dichio.
In summary you could pick two teams from the squad Reid had in 88-89
Click to expand...
I was agreeing with you all the way to the very last line :)
 
SKP130 said:
I was agreeing with you all the way to the very last line :)
Click to expand...

88/89 2x teams with first team appearances (inc sub) for second Xl.
Sorensen
Makin
Melville
Butler
Grey
Ball
Clark
Summerbee
Quinn
Phillips
Johnstone

Marriott x1
Holloway x6
Craddock x11
Williams x30
Scott x23
Rae x 18
McCann x14
Mullin x15
Smith x15
Bridges x36
Dichio. X 43
Sub
Thirlwell x5
6 started over 10 games
 
Chewit said:
88/89 2x teams with first team appearances (inc sub) for second Xl.
Sorensen
Makin
Melville
Butler
Grey
Ball
Clark
Summerbee
Quinn
Phillips
Johnstone

Marriott x1
Holloway x6
Craddock x11
Williams x30
Scott x23
Rae x 18
McCann x14
Mullin x15
Smith x15
Bridges x36
Dichio. X 43
Sub
Thirlwell x5
6 started over 10 games
Click to expand...
I meant you put 88-89.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top