• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Boro thread


Anyone willing to defend Adam Johnson as not technically a paedophile is picking a very dodgy hill to die on.

Paedophilia might refer to prepubescent children in the dictionary but it's common usage isn't restricted to that.

Hell of a thing to argue about in relation to football either way.
 
Anyone willing to defend Adam Johnson as not technically a paedophile is picking a very dodgy hill to die on.

Paedophilia might refer to prepubescent children in the dictionary but it's common usage isn't restricted to that.

Hell of a thing to argue about in relation to football either way.

What a strange post
 
Anyone willing to defend Adam Johnson as not technically a paedophile is picking a very dodgy hill to die on.

Paedophilia might refer to prepubescent children in the dictionary but it's common usage isn't restricted to that.

Hell of a thing to argue about in relation to football either way.
No one’s defending him. He’s a horrible horrible twat and a complete wrong’un and sex offender.

But in the eyes of the law he isn’t a paedo.
 
Dont tar us all with the same brush when a small minority of coke heads who boo the knee sing disgusting songs
Not being funny mate (and I know there's Boro fans that sing disgusting stuff too), but at the last Boro/Sunderland match (1-1) it was a lot more than a small minority.

"Banter" and piss taking at football is to be expected (and funny at times), but singing about that sort of stuff is awful (no matter who's singing it).
 
Not being funny mate (and I know there's Boro fans that sing disgusting stuff too), but at the last Boro/Sunderland match (1-1) it was a lot more than a small minority.

"Banter" and piss taking at football is to be expected (and funny at times), but singing about that sort of stuff is awful (no matter who's singing it).

At your place? I wasnt there so will have to take your word for it. Its horrific though however many are singing it.
Not really - it refers directly to the post above it.

Nitpicking on a technical definition when everyone knows what is meant s way too close to defending it.

Nobody is defending him and he's not a paedo. Lets end that discussion there eh
 
At your place? I wasnt there so will have to take your word for it. Its horrific though however many are singing it.


Nobody is defending him and he's not a paedo. Lets end that discussion there eh
After you'd equalised you can see that most of the supporters standing around the lad filming join in with the chanting, including the lad who is filming it.

You must be logged on to see media items
 
Back
Top