• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Jack Clarke

By the end of this season Rigg will surpass Clarke imho, just need to keep him for 2 years and get promotion
Rigg will be a much better player than Clarke by the time he is Clarkes age but I don’t think he will be better than him in a few months or end of the season next 2-3 seasons imo totally.
 

Wasn't it Romano who said something along lines of "things changed when Clarke made it clear he was desperate to play Premier league".

Either way, 20m plus a sell on clause? Potentially the 25m there anyway.
Dunno, wouldn't take anything that fella said as gospel though. I definitely wouldn't say it's clear that he was desperate to leave though
 
Wasn't it Romano who said something along lines of "things changed when Clarke made it clear he was desperate to play Premier league".

Either way, 20m plus a sell on clause? Potentially the 25m there anyway.
Depends on the breakdown of the +£5m add ons

I wouldn’t take Romano’s tweets as gospel. He’ll have been asked to say that by somebody.
 
So we get 20m now or probably half that next summer? I just think there's been way too much made of the fee when we're getting 20m and a sell on clause.
What makes you think it halves? I think the number we’re selling him at is still there in a year’s time. The clubs who go after a Jack Clarke want him now…they don’t want to wait until he’s available for nowt
 
Back
Top