Seaham_FTM
Striker
Why would we do a display when the mags played man City?Could have done it v Man City last time we played them if people felt so strongly about it, but we didn't for some reason.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why would we do a display when the mags played man City?Could have done it v Man City last time we played them if people felt so strongly about it, but we didn't for some reason.
Who will you be supporting?
Or....because it's closer to home it's made people more aware of it and, upon looking into it further, they've realised just how abhorrent your supreme leaders really are.Or time to show some hypocrisy on a massive scale and that we are only really bothered about human rights and sportswashing because its the mags. Any other team and we'd be fine with it. That's the truth as well.
Or time to show some hypocrisy on a massive scale and that we are only really bothered about human rights and sportswashing because its the mags. Any other team and we'd be fine with it. That's the truth as well.
Or time to show some hypocrisy on a massive scale and that we are only really bothered about human rights and sportswashing because its the mags. Any other team and we'd be fine with it. That's the truth as well.
Why would we do a display when the mags played man City?
Rightio!I'll be in my usual seat in the West Stand, towards the SWC. Come and say hello if you want marra.
It's 100% the time to have a go at Newcastle's ownership.
State ownership is killing the game, plus it's our duty to remind them lot that they don't get to feel all warm and fuzzy about their current "success". Not only is the right thing to do, it being beamed around then world will be massively embarrassing for those fuckers.
Keep it matter-of-fact imo. Something that speaks to their fans, players and management.
'You sold your soul to tories, despots, and charlatans''
I mean, if a mag is talking hypocrisy....let's not start on the fact that they were morally outraged at their previous owner and his business practices (0 hour contracts) and campaigned to remove him based on that, but their current owner is a murderous despot that executes journalists, gays, lesbians, bisexuals, and bombs the fuck out of Yemen killing bairns, commits war crimes etc. and they don't bad an eye.What hypocrisy?
Your uncle worked in Saudi and you are a mag. This is why you defend themWe've played Man City plenty of times since they were taken over and not one grumbling about human rights or sportswashing from any of us back then. We even celebrated them winning the league at the SoL and done a Poznan![]()
Maybe that's because they aren't our rivals so we weren't really bothered.
What hypocrisy?
Could have done it v Man City last time we played them if people felt so strongly about it, but we didn't for some reason.
You mean the poznan that was a blatant pisstake of Man United rather than showing affinity to City?The hypocrisy that we couldn't really care less about sportwashing or human rights and are only bothering because its them lot who've benefitted from it.
If it was something genuinely close to our hearts we would have done the same when we played Man City and certainly wouldn't have done the Poznan to celebrate them winning their first league title under their new Middle East Ownership.
People are pissed that they've effectively won the lottery. They would be in the same league as we are now if not for their new owners let's not forget, but all this does is shoes how much it bothers us and they'll lap it up.
This.The Man City ownership wasn't relevant to us as Man City holds no relevant importance to most of us, so most people didn't look into it/educate themselves on it.
It wasn't effecting our local community, sportswashing propagandists weren't our neighbours, Man City aren't our local rivals and so it wasn't mentioned by them to us at every opportunity.
Your uncle worked in Saudi and you are a mag. This is why you defend them
The Man City ownership wasn't relevant to us as Man City holds no relevant importance to most of us, so most people didn't look into it/educate themselves on it.
It wasn't effecting our local community, sportswashing propagandists weren't our neighbours, Man City aren't our local rivals and so it wasn't mentioned by them to us at every opportunity.
The veil slipped ages ago man you mag bastard, you're not fooling anyone
So it's jealousy then that it's them up the road, just as I said. Why show them how bothered we are? They'll just laugh at us when instead we could do something Pro Sunderland on a scale we've never done before with all the money we are raising as a fanbase and the £10k KLD has chipped in.
MagCall me a mag if you like. Water off a ducks back. But when that is your counter argument you are basically admitting I am right.