Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yep, VAR can look at the foul to see if it should be red.
This thread is a pretty funny read. Anyone remotely against VAR jumping up and down as if there are 50 of these accidents happening every weekend.I know that's the 'popular' view but its actually bollocks. VAR does actually get most of the stuff right and the daft decision tonight gets rightly highlighted but before VAR there would be a handful of contentious offsides every week in the PL and maybe two or three of them would be wrong. Now they get the vast majority of them right. How many other offside errors have there been in the PL so far this season?
Offside should be the easiest of the lot for VAR but the people operating VAR are human and we all make mistakes as was highlighted tonight. Before VAR MOTD would have talked about 4 or 5 offsides rather than just this one.
it ”works” in every other country. UEFA and FIFA have the hump with the English football authorities because of their different usage of var. “We” are doing it wrong. That’s all that’s not working.Strange post and strange comparison….
My final point to you would be that I think this kind of thing works tremendously well in cricket or rugby and I’m all in favour of it. It isn’t perfect there either, but it works. I’m also all for goal line technology. However, the effect that it has had on the game has been overwhelmingly bad. Look at the level of discussion around it. Look at how it has completely messed up the interpretation of handball for example.
We have very different views on it. Have a good afternoon!
I’d agree that to some extent it works better in the continent and the automated offside is something that should be standard.it ”works” in every other country. UEFA and FIFA have the hump with the English football authorities because of their different usage of var. “We” are doing it wrong. That’s all that’s not working.
A mate who knows Clattenburg says he said never been a better time to be an official basically fast tracking any one who can blow a whistle or wave a flagI think it's becoming clear that a lot of the officials are just thick.
The concept of referees consulting video replays is in essence a good thing, it’s how each referee or video assistant interprets them is the problem.VAR can DEFINITELY be improved on how it is used in the PL, but the idea of giving referees the ability to consult video replays seems an absolute basic thing for any sport in 2023.
Get rid of VAR ... get the linesman to put their flag up straight away too... flagging an offside at the end of a play not when they see the offside is pointless...
The Diaz 'goal' would have been flagged offside immediately and Diaz may not have even scored as he didn't shoot immediately so wouldn't even exist in the 1st place. It's impossible to know how many legitimate goals could have been scored if play had continued. This is why this rule is in place, let play go on and as soon as the possibility of an immediate goal in that phase is gone then stop play for offside, or even play on depending on what happens (linesman can tell ref it's offside through microphone).Who ever brought that rule in should be banned from football
Is that not due to the shite officials get at all levels, right down to kids level. They get shite from players and also fans/parents on the sidelines. They're even trialling refs wearing bodycams in the hope of stopping the abuse.A mate who knows Clattenburg says he said never been a better time to be an official basically fast tracking any one who can blow a whistle or wave a flag
This is because they don't want to interrupt the flow of the game as much and it's to appease the fans. In the 1st season of VAR, they were stopping it for all sorts and it was making games much longer and there was hell on. They brought in the Clear & Obvious thing to stop this and supposedly raised the bar even this season higher to stop the interruptions. However you then get decisions that would probably be given the other way if watched on replays by the main ref left as is and now VAR is even more shite.VAR can’t intervene because they’ve got a ‘don’t undermine the ref’ mentality rather than get w correct decision.
This clear and obvious error nonsense is another issue, it’s about saving Dave if officials rather than correcting them
When you play fifa on the PlayStation it can call an offside to the mm instantly. You would think this technology along with Hawkeye or similar to scan the players bodies in real time could be used more effectively than the current system. This incident might be the spark that pushes it in that direction imo.
I keep referring back to cricket.
For lbw they have a static camera, known distance from the point of release, known height of the stumps.
Even with all that certainly they admit the technological limitations can't accurately recreate the live image with no reasonable doubt.
Football has cameras on pivots or people running up and down and expect to be able to guage the distance between players from a distance a minimum of twice that of a cricket pitch from a none fixed position at a random angle to the play with a frame rate that must mean there can be a margin of error in the frame that picked as "the point the ball was played forward". Still it seems to make no allowance for the fact the on field officials had a better view as they aren't working from a recorded image.
Obvious breakdown of protocol yesterday which is the main issue but on or offside I think they are trying to make the available pictures do something they aren't capable of.
If thye want this level of scrutiny there should be dedicated fixed cameras covering the whole pitch. The for TV pictures aren't good enough quality imo.
It's already used in the World Cup, Champions League and other countries leagues such as Serie A in Italy and La Liga in Spain. I do know that there needs to be 12 cameras and not all PL grounds will have this installed. They also didn't want to install it as it's evolving so would soon be out of date!If technology can keep 10,000 planes in the sky 24 hours a day and 7 days a week, something should be able to be created that spots if a player is offside in football.
They were offered it for this season but refused it as clubs voted against it. They did bring in 4 extra cameras for it but obviously that still didn't stop what happened yesterday. Yet if VAR worked like rugby the officials would have clearly discussed what decision needed reviewing and realised their mistake rather than VAR just saying "Check complete". Or even simply by saying adding after the "Check complete, goal CORRECT decision" and the ref then saying "Ya daft knacker, it was flagged offside man" means the goal would have been given.The champions league use automated offsides don't they? I think they're going to roll it out to all UEFA competitions. If the Champions league can automate it why can't we use that technology in the premier League?
I thought VAR would get rid of refs cheating,but clearly not.I think it's becoming clear that a lot of the officials are just thick.
They only have to look at the positioning of 22 players max,usually no more than three or four.It shouldn’t be hard.The only thing I can think happened tonight is that the VAR ref has quickly looked at the Liverpool forward being ahead of the nearest defender and called it offside without looking at the defender at the bottom of the screen. It’s that bad it can only be human error.
If we’re still having human errors then it’s not working, and not specifically this instance, but there still seems an element of human bias in the var room which is incredibly frustrating too.
Even rugby is getting things wrong mind, which will always be the case but the amount of simple decisions VAR is getting wrong in football is unacceptable. You're sat their aghast wondering how they've managed to cock some of them up as badly as they have done.It's already used in the World Cup, Champions League and other countries leagues such as Serie A in Italy and La Liga in Spain. I do know that there needs to be 12 cameras and not all PL grounds will have this installed. They also didn't want to install it as it's evolving so would soon be out of date!
You must be logged on to see external links
You must be logged on to see media items
A more detailed explanation here
You must be logged on to see external linksThey were offered it for this season but refused it as clubs voted against it. They did bring in 4 extra cameras for it but obviously that still didn't stop what happened yesterday. Yet if VAR worked like rugby the officials would have clearly discussed what decision needed reviewing and realised their mistake rather than VAR just saying "Check complete". Or even simply by saying adding after the "Check complete, goal CORRECT decision" and the ref then saying "Ya daft knacker, it was flagged offside man" means the goal would have been given.
It will probably be in for next season now after this fuck up. Though even that wouldn't stop it as VAR thought it was onside anyway which is what the semi-automated stuff would have done.
You must be logged on to see external links
They need to improve communication and aye people say it's hectic given the audio that they've released but some of this is the players on the pitch moaning instantly. Again they need disciplined and instant yellow card if they go towards the ref while he's discussing owt with VAR. They will soon learn to keep their trap shut and even then just allow the captains to have a word when the ref allows like they do in rugby. Look at the difference in making this decision, especially at 32 secs when the ref tells a player to go away and he instantly does.
You must be logged on to see media items.
or this as football players are neanderthal in comparison to the respect this ref gets from rugby players
You must be logged on to see media items.
"It's not soccer" at 1 min 47 secs and again at 2:50I don't watch rugby as I think it's shite but football needs to adapt to get players to act more like rugby players rather than whingey moaning twisty abusive brats
Sky have enough bellends….. im glad these two bell ends aren’t on sky anymore.
Are you trying to provoke an argument. If so then I bid you farewell.It's not. They don't look at the hand when reviewing offside. But please carry on thinking they do.
I don't watch rugby but they are a different level when it comes to decision making and how they go about it, along with the behaviour of the players. This error is down to communication which should have been implemented in the first place, though how the fuck did VAR not see them going to take the free kick instead of the kick off?Even rugby is getting things wrong mind, which will always be the case but the amount of simple decisions VAR is getting wrong in football is unacceptable. You're sat their aghast wondering how they've managed to cock some of them up as badly as they have done.
They've panicked and hoyed up the offside graphic but for obvious reasons they didn't put the lines on. Maybe they were hoping nobody would noticeHang on…..when a goal is checked for ‘offside’ doesn’t it come up on the screen (presumably from VAR) that the goal is “disallowed” for “Offside”
Surely if VAR thought that it was onside then they wouldn’t send that graphic to the screen.
That’s not how the Hawkeye ball tracking technology itself works in cricket. That uses multiple imaging units at multiple positions to to track the actual trajectory of the ball, and then project it from the point of impact. The calculation is a simple ballistic one and the margin of error is determinable, quantifiable, and can be more or less as low as you want it to be if you pay for enough high resolution imaging devices.I keep referring back to cricket.
For lbw they have a static camera, known distance from the point of release, known height of the stumps.
Even with all that certainly they admit the technological limitations can't accurately recreate the live image with no reasonable doubt.
Exactly my point use the technology properly to the point it is no longer accurate enough. Twatting about drawing lines or not is no use to anyoneThat’s not how the Hawkeye ball tracking technology itself works in cricket. That uses multiple imaging units at multiple positions to to track the actual trajectory of the ball, and then project it from the point of impact. The calculation is a simple ballistic one and the margin of error is determinable, quantifiable, and can be more or less as low as you want it to be if you pay for enough high resolution imaging devices.
The end on camera is then used to generate a fake projected image to keep the TV audience happy and add to the drama. But that’s not how the ball’s trajectory is determined. The semi automated system for offside works in much the same way, using I think 16 separate cameras to reconstruct the position on the field of play numerically and using that reconstruction to determine offside. Again, after that to keep the TV audience happy, a fake virtual image is then generated of the offside incident, but this fake image is not what is used to answer the question about the players’ positions.
Importantly, in both cases, this takes any human judgement entirely out of the equation.
Fair enough, I misunderstood where you were coming from. We are in complete agreement as regards twatting about with lines.Exactly my point use the technology properly to the point it is no longer accurate enough. Twatting about drawing lines or not is no use to anyone