-
The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
Please read this thread for more details.
New user registrations are currently disabled.
3rd test - Headingley
- Thread starter chunkyshanhawk53
- Start date
mackembhoy
Striker
Yep two second innings in a row the Aussies have decided to bat like morons just like us.
So, are we absolutely clear that Foakes has to play at OT now?
Ave it!
mackembhoy
Striker
I also can't wait to see how we end up losing this one if we have an achievable runchase
Jack Torrance
Striker
Aye, he hit a century there last year as well
Voice of fair play
Striker
Yeah but would still play Bsirstow as a batsman
Drop who?
Yankee
Winger
Like we have the first two tests - swing at everything and get caught sooner rather than later.
LJP1786
Striker
Would be happy with that but I don’t think they’ll drop Bairstow as WK.
Mr Redknapp
Striker
Its what he does mate. Can be pelted but can take wicketsAlways rated Ali
hank evans
Striker
MO ball
KGC83
Striker
Brook for me. Not drop as such, just give him a break. He looks a rabbit in the headlights facing these aussie quicks.
LJP1786
Striker
Canny name for his 200th wicket as well.
mackembhoy
Striker
Was more will we get a 70 all out or be 200/1 and then capitulate.
Anyway 7 wickets still to take and plenty of rain about over the next 3 days.
hank evans
Striker
He’s certainly not a number 3. I’ve said before I’d bring foakes in but for pope til now and bat him3. Got a good temprement, yes this is a different kettle of fish to what he’s done before. But Brook looks shot
Voice of fair play
Striker
Just play the batting line up they had for first test Bairstow instead of Pope ( not at 3) and Foakes keeping
