• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Bid rejected for Clarke


Mboma said:
Clubs that want players also leak stuff to try and unsettle players too, along with agents of course.
Click to expand...
This has the stink of agents written all over it, all the clubs linked and the new contract etc being discussed, got all the hallmarks of agent leaking.
 
MSC said:
Aye - It would be a challenge- we’d be down probably our 3 most effective forwards as it stands (assuming LND is injured/away)
Click to expand...
A front line without Stewart, Amad and Clarke is hugely detrimental to the quality of the team. We’d be unrecognisable
 
Mackemansj1 said:
This has the stink of agents written all over it, all the clubs linked and the new contract etc being discussed, got all the hallmarks of agent leaking.
Click to expand...
His agent is Ian harte who seemingly has a good relationship with the club. Sure he represents several of the signings we've made.

Just checked and he represents 5 sunderland players. I can't see him playing funny buggers tbh.
 
Last edited:
Mowgli said:
His agent is Ian harte who seemingly has a good relationship with the club. Sure he represents several of the signings we've made.

Just checked and he represents 5 sunderland players. I can't see him playing funny buggers tbh.
Click to expand...
It's his job TBF, he will be smoking out the interest to either get him a move or get as big a contract he can get out of us.
 
Mackemansj1 said:
It's his job TBF, he will be smoking out the interest to either get him a move or get as big a contract he can get out of us.
Click to expand...
I'm not sure I agree tbh. Clubs and agents can have good relationships and I believe this is probably one.

Info could come from the selling club or anything to try and unsettle him.
 
Mowgli said:
I'm not sure I agree tbh. Clubs and agents can have good relationships and I believe this is probably one.

Info could come from the selling club or anything to try and unsettle him.
Click to expand...
It's a dirty old game they're all at it imho, thing is I think we've actually got people who know the game of transfers now tbh it's not blind leading the blind like it's been for so long here.
 
Mackemansj1 said:
It's a dirty old game they're all at it imho, thing is I think we've actually got people who know the game of transfers now tbh it's not blind leading the blind like it's been for so long here.
Click to expand...
I agree. I love Clarke but there's a figure when we'd be daft not to sell. I really just hope we hold out for that figure or keep him.
 
JERUDONG No.10 said:
I don’t think the model involves us having our pants pulled down. £10m wouldn’t cover what we owe Spurs, so absolutely zero point. Plus, the article is horse spunk.
Click to expand...
Surely what we will owe Spurs will be just a percentage of any profit made, not a fixed fee of over £10m.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top