mackembhoy
Striker
50% catch success off the pacersHe’s absolutely dogshit in the slips.
You must be logged on to see media items
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
50% catch success off the pacersHe’s absolutely dogshit in the slips.
Crawley 13/26. Is there anything whatsoever to justify his selection ? Batting mediocre, slip catching 50/5050% catch success off the pacers
You must be logged on to see media items
Ah, so we're also weakening our slips with this change rather than strengthening it, not like Steve Smith is decent with the bat or anything to give extra chances to50% catch success off the pacers
You must be logged on to see media items
Just needs a pair in the test nowCrawley 13/26. Is there anything whatsoever to justify his selection ? Batting mediocre, slip catching 50/50
its getting more and more downright untenable
He was totally shot last summer with boult and Southee. They didn’t really celebrate getting him by the end. It’s beyond obvious that starc will bowl in swingers for lbw or bowled and hazlewood will just bang it down on fifth stump for the inevitable edge to second slipAh, so we're also weakening our slips with this change rather than strengthening it, not like Steve Smith is decent with the bat or anything to give extra chances to
Just needs a pair in the test now
Good.he will drop a test changing catch during the series. The stats prove so
He does!Brook has had one of the best starts in test cricket history he's got massive credit in the bank
50% catch success off the pacers
You must be logged on to see media items
I don’t agree with your posts but that’s cricket
I reckon I could do better than 50%
You aren’t willing to debate anyones posts that don’t agree with your own by the looks of things, that’s not cricket.
I made my points pretty clear mind. Bairstow n Brook are superstars in the middle order and should not be asked to open. Simple as that.
They left foakes out in Pakistan, I’m a bit mystified by the outrage.
Stokes picks the team, he’s in charge, he’s won 10 out of 12 , he knows what he’s doing.
It’s just my opinion, that’s all
Ben Foakes is the best wicketkeeper in the world.
Team England told us that, not my words.
Why would you drop the best wicketkeeper in the world from your team?
Why also are you falsely equating this as either Bairstow or Foakes? Why is it one v one? Can’t they both be in the team?
My other worry is stokes being injured and barely played a game in anger for months
Same for bairstow, who has had two 4 day matches and has seemed very slow and scrappy
Root barely batted for months
Harry Brook hasn't set the ipl alight a side from one 100 he has struggled.
Anderson older and picked up another niggle
Dan Lawrence seems to be distinctly average
Crawley below average
Also think we still struggle in the spinner department
Yup. This summer is gonna be a much needed reality check for Stokes and McCullum.Yeah and Australia are warming up for the Ashes with a Test in English conditions against India. We’re playing a glorified friendly against Ireland.
We will winYup. This summer is gonna be a much needed reality check for Stokes and McCullum.
I take it that your not a Crawley fanI don’t know if Tim Murtagh is still involved at test level for Ireland but I can see him now steaming in at 75mph, gentle inswing taking out Crawley in the first session
Bairstow and Brook have to play in the middle order, therefor there is no room for Foakes. You can’t drop Root or Stokes. I don’t really get the controversy.