• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state with some features missing, normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Put a flat earthier into space

I wonder if there are signs in the sky telling pilots to avoid the central projector 🤷‍♂️
The flight plans are made in such a way that they never come close the area that no man or machine can function. Even though this area can't be accessed or even approached somehow travel has been arranged around the unknown area. The only anomaly is when the fake manipulated point to point navigation systems fail and planes disappear, ala, getting lost in the Bermuda Triangle. When this occurs the planes and all the people in have probably unknowingly found the unapproachable central projector area and become frozen.
That's because to offer anything to the dome you would need to overcome, um, air resistance that is totally different than the air resistance that you need to overcome to offer an aeronautical winged vehicle to Australia (which he does not deny exists) or New Zealand (unknown; wasn't on the map).

Or the dome is like 20,000 miles high. If it's pointed out to him that nonstop airborne circumnavigations of more than 20,000 miles have been done, he will change the number to 100,000 miles.

Also, offer offer offerrrrrr.
It is in not what we are discussing. Love that one.
 

It is in not what we are discussing. Love that one.
The one that caused me the most mirth was "So you think a railway offers a full-on landmass of Australia?" It reads like a sentence that's been run through about eight different languages in Google Translate and then just shat onto the page in one beautiful orgy of interrogatory glory.
 
The flight plans are made in such a way that they never come close the area that no man or machine can function. Even though this area can't be accessed or even approached somehow travel has been arranged around the unknown area. The only anomaly is when the fake manipulated point to point navigation systems fail and planes disappear, ala, getting lost in the Bermuda Triangle. When this occurs the planes and all the people in have probably unknowingly found the unapproachable central projector area and become frozen.
Won't be a right angle triangle though
 
The one that caused me the most mirth was "So you think a railway offers a full-on landmass of Australia?" It reads like a sentence that's been run through about eight different languages in Google Translate and then just shat onto the page in one beautiful orgy of interrogatory glory.
I know it was northern hemisphere engines that run on the Australian network as fact and that proves the earth is not a globe hurting through a vacuum via 93 million mile space rock
 
That's because to offer anything to the dome you would need to overcome, um, air resistance that is totally different than the air resistance that you need to overcome to offer an aeronautical winged vehicle to Australia (which he does not deny exists) or New Zealand (unknown; wasn't on the map).

Or the dome is like 20,000 miles high. If it's pointed out to him that nonstop airborne circumnavigations of more than 20,000 miles have been done, he will change the number to 100,000 miles.

Also, offer offer offerrrrrr.
I do think some of the explanations on this are fantastic. The only way to lay the earth out on a disc is to make massive distances in the southern hemisphere. The distance from Australia to South Africa is huge and goes over northern Europe. But planes can do that at a time entirely consistent with flights in the northern hemisphere because of a special wind pushing them along. But at the same time, planes going the opposite way are pushed by an equal and opposite special wind.

How does it know which planes to push? How does it know what direction? All this super fast travel time makes the globe lie believable, but imagine if it picked a South Africa to London flight to woosh along and it did it in 2 hours, where the one going to Sydney ran out of fuel over Norway?

Then there are boats which are equally affected, but the super fast wind doesn’t cause a storm or rip the sails of sailing boats.

Amazing stuff. Almost feels like you need a god like intelligence at work. But then it was said a few weeks ago that the fake of planets was so perfect it could be deliberate, so perhaps not that implausible after all.
 
don’t they exist on your “planet”?
What planet?
Let's have a poll.
Anyone who has found anything of nukeys to have any substance shout up.
It's a no from me.
Yet
Until you provide some, like details of an experiment or your new map
I expect nothing more.
Having said that, I suspect your interest is massively peaked as are a few others.
However, I have no complaints to be fair because I haven't found anything of substance coming from your side.
What use is a poll? Just because there are millions (if not billions) on the side of reality, it doesn't mean they are right. What if 17.4 million people voted for something stupid, would that naturally mean it would just work and was not a bad idea? Of course not.

There is only one person in the history of humanity who knows the real truth and we can consider ourselves lucky to have engaged with him. (In the eyes of one person only)
Like voting for governments or taking up a religion and so on and so on.
Many can be wrong or many cannot know the truth but many can believe anything to be the truth without proof if the story and mass adherence to it, is compelling.
Also @nukey you say the earth is like a lemon squeezer raised in the centre.
Yes.
In your world any sort of water unhindered in a container would show to be very slightly deeper at one side to the other depending on where you were on lemon squeezer world.
The depth is based on a variety of elevations of the sea bed.
You could have a few miles deep to 10mm deep from the same sea.
So one of these must be false, either there is no gradient as such or water being flat and level isn't a true test.
I don't know how you're coming to this. Maybe you can explain.
 
Last edited:
Yet we can fly 10000 miles between countries ha ha.
Horizontally, yes.
His replies get more ridiculous by the week.
It depends on how each person wants to look at it.
However I shall humbly apologise to him if his new 2d map works.
No need for any apologies. Just keep to your narrative.
The dome is really high. Also, when planes enter the vortex, they are slowed down and either the dials are manipulated, or the pilot lies about the actual speed, therefore the distances travelled are much less than put in fake maps.
Pilots know they fly over level, not curvature.
That's because to offer anything to the dome you would need to overcome, um, air resistance that is totally different than the air resistance that you need to overcome to offer an aeronautical winged vehicle to Australia (which he does not deny exists) or New Zealand (unknown; wasn't on the map).

Or the dome is like 20,000 miles high. If it's pointed out to him that nonstop airborne circumnavigations of more than 20,000 miles have been done, he will change the number to 100,000 miles.

Also, offer offer offerrrrrr.
You do know you can circumnavigate a circle, right?
 
Last edited:
Thats because you are an ignorant arrogant clown.
You will need new sandals very soon and you've got nowhere.
A few miles over 20000 miles say to the centre would look nothing like a lemon squeezer it would look completely flat
Over distance, yes I agree but we aren't looking at 20,000 miles we are visualising a setup that you are taking literally as the Orlando map and basing assumptions on that.
 
Last edited:
You will need new sandals very soon and you've got nowhere.

Over distance, yes I agree but we aren't looking at 20,000 miles we are visualising a setup that you are taking literally as the Orlando map and basing assumptions on that.
OK let's start again, on your 50000 mile wide lemon squeezer, even allowing for a think ice wall would you say 20000 from the lower bowl to the centre is roughly correct?
If so ROUGHLY what is the gradient or ROUGHLY what is the rise in miles from lowest to higher point at the end of the uninhabitable centre
 
You will need new sandals very soon and you've got nowhere.

Over distance, yes I agree but we aren't looking at 20,000 miles we are visualising a setup that you are taking literally as the Orlando map and basing assumptions on that.

It would really help things if you'd provide links or drawings to the maps or your set up how you visualize it. Then we could visualise what you mean better.
One of us will engage in a topic with you based on how you've explained it, but then you say but its not like that. So it goes a different way, then you say not like that either.

Save you a lot of typing and explaining as well
 
OK let's start again, on your 50000 mile wide lemon squeezer, even allowing for a think ice wall would you say 20000 from the lower bowl to the centre is roughly correct?
50,000 miles wide?
If so ROUGHLY what is the gradient or ROUGHLY what is the rise in miles from lowest to higher point at the end of the uninhabitable centre
You're making up your own stuff here. Which is fine but don;t attribute it to me.
 
Back
Top