• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state with some features missing, normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Put a flat earthier into space


Let's have a poll.
Anyone who has found anything of nukeys to have any substance shout up.
It's a no from me.
Yet
Until you provide some, like details of an experiment or your new map
What use is a poll? Just because there are millions (if not billions) on the side of reality, it doesn't mean they are right. What if 17.4 million people voted for something stupid, would that naturally mean it would just work and was not a bad idea? Of course not.

There is only one person in the history of humanity who knows the real truth and we can consider ourselves lucky to have engaged with him. (In the eyes of one person only)
 
Also @nukey you say the earth is like a lemon squeezer raised in the centre.
In your world any sort of water unhindered in a container would show to be very slightly deeper at one side to the other depending on where you were on lemon squeezer world.
So one of these must be false, either there is no gradient as such or water being flat and level isn't a true test.
 
What is kick? Is it like offering a non-oblate spheroid to the forward-directed face of a manufactured metatarsal enclosure?

Because that's impossible and you know it.
Kick definitely proves the earth is not spinning.

In other new Newcastle Lad was right, they are sending rockets into the drink

 
Kick definitely proves the earth is not spinning.

In other new Newcastle Lad was right, they are sending rockets into the drink

Good lord me! Can you imagine if they'd successfully offered that payload to its theoretical vertical horizon? It would have cracked the dome!

Wait, what's on the other side of the dome? Elephants? Turtles?
 
Good lord me! Can you imagine if they'd successfully offered that payload to its theoretical vertical horizon? It would have cracked the dome!

Wait, what's on the other side of the dome? Elephants? Turtles?
it's impossible to load a vehicle with enough fuel to reach the dome. That's what the sage told us.
Bugger the whole thing will come crumbling down now.
Globe manufacturers will be shutting up shop from tomorrow
wish they would stop wasting all this money putting rockets in the drink. it could be used to help Liz Truss balance the budget many times over
 
Last edited:
Yet we can fly 10000 miles between countries ha ha.
His replies get more ridiculous by the week.
However I shall humbly apologise to him if his new 2d map works.
The dome is really high. Also, when planes enter the vortex, they are slowed down and either the dials are manipulated, or the pilot lies about the actual speed, therefore the distances travelled are much less than put in fake maps.
 
The dome is really high. Also, when planes enter the vortex, they are slowed down and either the dials are manipulated, or the pilot lies about the actual speed, therefore the distances travelled are much less than put in fake maps.
I wonder if there are signs in the sky telling pilots to avoid the central projector 🤷‍♂️
 
Yet we can fly 10000 miles between countries ha ha.
His replies get more ridiculous by the week.
However I shall humbly apologise to him if his new 2d map works.
That's because to offer anything to the dome you would need to overcome, um, air resistance that is totally different than the air resistance that you need to overcome to offer an aeronautical winged vehicle to Australia (which he does not deny exists) or New Zealand (unknown; wasn't on the map).

Or the dome is like 20,000 miles high. If it's pointed out to him that nonstop airborne circumnavigations of more than 20,000 miles have been done, he will change the number to 100,000 miles.

Also, offer offer offerrrrrr.
 
Back
Top