Put a flat earthier into space

[DPTT]

It offers a better idea of it.

You’ve still got the same problem with Sydney, Rio and New York

 

[legend7]

Your two have been scrubbed.

But my two were spaced apart to scale based on your 50k mile wide earth.
So you admit you can't make your map work with the miles and sizes we know are correct as they are travelled regularly.
Finally getting somewhere, your theory doesn't work on either the lemon squeezer or our 2d maps even though you said they were a fair representation.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

No it isn't. The globe can be proved to be.

By all means say it has but the reality is, it hasn't been proved at all.

And you've been shown to be wrong so many times it's just comedy now.

Shown to be wrong as in what?
I'm glad you're enjoying your comedy show. At least you;re happy.

And so long as it's just potentials in your mind no-one cares

Good, no one needs to care.

, but once you start making the claim that "Earth is definitely not a globe" then you can expect to be pulled up on it.

I do expect to be called on it and I've been called on it thousands of times and still not one proof. So It's easy going for me.

 

[Pancho]

The funniest part is that he doesn't realise the impossibility of what he suggests.

Oh, I think he does.

Hence, just like every other FE cult member, he either deflects, obfuscates or simply lies.

 

[legend7]

Nukey's long lost Scottish brother surely.

It's uncanny.

You must be logged on to see media items

Now we know where he gets his musings from.
Or actually @Nukehasslefan do you have a Scottish accent and terrible hair? (I have no hair tbf)

 

[Pancho]

Now we know where he gets his musings from.
Or actually @Nukehasslefan do you have a Scottish accent and terrible hair? (I have no hair tbf)

Plus an horrendous nose picking habit?

 

[The Snockerty Friddle]

By all means say it has but the reality is, it hasn't been proved at all.

By all means tell me I have a nose on my face but I cant see it and you have proved nothing....

Shown to be wrong as in what?

Pretty much all of it

I'm glad you're enjoying your comedy show. At least you;re happy.

I'd be happier with the explanation you claim to have given but didn't rather than a whole lot of irrelevant deflection posts.

Good, no one needs to care.

I do expect to be called on it and I've been called on it thousands of times and still not one proof. So It's easy going for me.

They do say ignorance is bliss

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Finally acceptance that every single distance measured on a globe works in line with observed travelling and well measured distances. In terms of distance a globe works.

No distances work on a globe because we do not live on a globe and you do not and can not prove we do. It's as simple as that to be fair.
Any distances are simply the distances over the terrain or a level water mass or over water and land by air or by uneven land by foot or vehicle, not a convex terrain and certainly, absolutely not over a globe.

A week or two ago you agreed the observed angles to polaris work for a globe.

No, I didn't.
You offered a diagram for angles and I went with it. Not for a globe, just for an angle to a point of light.

So now we have two agreed bits of evidence where the globe model actually works.

Absolutely not but feel free to keep saying it.

On the other side, no working 2d map can be produced where distances work.

No working globe map can be produced, except to use a 2d map and skew it.

I’ve just remembered I said I’d do a simulation of the angle to polaris on an alternate world and didn’t. I’ll try to do that in the next couple of days.

By all means, do it but you're going to be offering what you want it to offer.

So you believe in something that some other nutcase has told you about then? A little bit hypocritical dont you think?

We're all hypocrites.

The funniest part is that he doesn't realise the impossibility of what he suggests.

And you don't realise the impossibility of a spinning globe and gravity and empty space vacuums.

Not falling for that old trick feller. You didn't explain it because it's absolutely impossible. Do your own research.

No issue here, I'll leave it att that, and you can look it up or not. Your decision.

You’ve still got the same problem with Sydney, Rio and New York

Show me what your issue is.

But my two were spaced apart to scale based on your 50k mile wide earth.

No they weren't.

So you admit you can't make your map work with the miles and sizes we know are correct as they are travelled regularly.

I'm admitting to nothing. It seems you are doing it for me and you're absolutely welcome to it because it gets you nowhere.

Finally getting somewhere, your theory doesn't work on either the lemon squeezer or our 2d maps even though you said they were a fair representation.

Then you have no further need to ask.

Now we know where he gets his musings from.
Or actually @Nukehasslefan do you have a Scottish accent and terrible hair? (I have no hair tbf)

Why are you asking? Surely you must know by now what my status is and the way I look. Many have worked it all out apparently and you're just adding a few final touches.
I'll leave it up to you for the final photofit. Knock yourself out.

 

[Pancho]

No distances work on a globe because we do not live on a globe and you do not and can not prove we do. It's as simple as that to be fair.
Any distances are simply the distances over the terrain or a level water mass or over water and land by air or by uneven land by foot or vehicle, not a convex terrain and certainly, absolutely not over a globe.

No, I didn't.
You offered a diagram for angles and I went with it. Not for a globe, just for an angle to a point of light.

Absolutely not but feel free to keep saying it.

No working globe map can be produced, except to use a 2d map and skew it.

By all means, do it but you're going to be offering what you want it to offer.

We're all hypocrites.

And you don't realise the impossibility of a spinning globe and gravity and empty space vacuums.

No issue here, I'll leave it att that, and you can look it up or not. Your decision.

Show me what your issue is.

No they weren't.

I'm admitting to nothing. It seems you are doing it for me and you're absolutely welcome to it because it gets you nowhere.

Then you have no further need to ask.

Why are you asking? Surely you must know by now what my status is and the way I look. Many have worked it all out apparently and you're just adding a few final touches.
I'll leave it up to you for the final photofit. Knock yourself out.

Your continued transparent deflection proves you have absolutely zip.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

By all means tell me I have a nose on my face but I cant see it and you have proved nothing....

I'll accept you do.

They do say ignorance is bliss

It can be. It depends on what's being ignored.

Your continued transparent deflection proves you have absolutely zip.

You can tell me this as many times as you feel the need to and it means absolutely nothing to what I believe and the stuff I do or how I answer.

 

[Pancho]

I'll accept you do.

It can be. It depends on what's being ignored.

You can tell me this as many times as you feel the need to and it means absolutely nothing to what I believe and the stuff I do or how I answer.

You've got absolutely bot all.

You're a cult member of the dumbest hoax on the internet.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

You've got absolutely bot all.

You're a cult member of the dumbest hoax on the internet.

And again you're absolutely welcome to your opinion on me. And once again it means absolutely nothing to me. You carry on and offer whatever opinion suits you.

 

[DPTT]

You must be logged on to see external links

New York to Sydney 9929 miles
Rio to Sydney 8396 miles
Rio to Sydney on this map you have to go over New York
How can that be?

 

[Nukehasslefan]

You must be logged on to see external links

New York to Sydney 9929 miles
Rio to Sydney 8396 miles
Rio to Sydney on this map you have to go over New York
How can that be?

What do you know about flights?

 

[DPTT]

What do you know about flights?

Am talking about distances?

Can you answer the question please without deflecting

 

[Pancho]

And again you're absolutely welcome to your opinion on me. And once again it means absolutely nothing to me. You carry on and offer whatever opinion suits you.

Go on then, make a prediction.

Any prediction, sunrise, sunset, moon phase, high tide, low tide, eclipse, the movement of a comet, literally any future event for anywhere on earth - but based solely on your reasoning and not globe based calculations.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Am talking about distances?

Can you answer the question please without deflecting

Can you tell me where to get a direct flight from Rio to Sydney?

Go on then, make a prediction.

Any prediction, sunrise, sunset, moon phase, high tide, low tide, eclipse, the movement of a comet, literally any future event for anywhere on earth - but based solely on your reasoning and not globe based calculations.

I have no need to make any predictions. Why would I need to make a prediction?

 

[legend7]

No they weren't.

But they actually are, have you measured the distance?
So looking at your two you're saying the gap between yours (meant to be 8000 miles) is less than a 5th of the overall width which represents 50k miles?
Think you need to go to specsavers fella?

 

[DPTT]

Can you tell me where to get a direct flight from Rio to Sydney?

Can you just answer the question I asked please

Am not too bothered about airports just the distances involved

 

[Nukehasslefan]

But they actually are, have you measured the distance?
So looking at your two you're saying the gap between yours (meant to be 8000 miles) is less than a 5th of the overall width which represents 50k miles?
Think you need to go to specsavers fella?

I'm fine. You're offering what you feel is correct for you.