Space aliens..Amazing thing is though we could all do what @DaveH has done and come up with the same results
Wonder why
Space doesn't exist so they must be in different cells who have to use tunnels like The Great Escape to reach each other
Mole men
He's not gonna shag you mateGive @Nukehasslefan his dues mind he’s spent a lot of time on flat Earth forums to be able to copy and paste what he says
Takes time and dedication to follow others without proof
In all seriousness, somebody on here found his posts on flat earth forums, and even on there they reckon he's a bit extreme and full of shitGive @Nukehasslefan his dues mind he’s spent a lot of time on flat Earth forums to be able to copy and paste what he says
Takes time and dedication to follow others without proof
Bump28,000 posts on there since 2012.
Right, let's get cracking...
You must be logged on to see external links
#1. Replying to the question: "So what is the Moon then?" He says: "A reflection of the sun."
#2. "The thing is, do we have any genuine writings from Eratosthenes or are we reliant on stories, like we are with Jesus on a cross and all the rest of the stuff that went along with it?"
#3. "I'm currently where I'm at now because I'm doing little experiments and such. "
#4. "No. I don't dismiss science as utter nonsense. Science is science, which is the Earth. It's the misinformation passed off as scientific which I class as nonsense."
#5. "There's no experiment that proves a globe. This Eratosthenes nonsense is a story of old, told by whoever set it into motion to reinforce the global mindset."
#6. "I'm talking about questioning stuff that makes zero sense."
#7. "The above can be tested and re-tested. It's observable and you absolutely know this. But you're fighting a battle to keep the narrative and are backed, en-masse, so I don't expect you to use logic to go against that."
#8. "Because no amount of technology is going to make space a reality so the best that can be done is to merely pretend it is by fobbing us off with CGI movies."
#9. "It doesn't always push us down to the surface. It pushes us up as well. It's all about dense mass against dense mass and which mass wins the day as to whether we get pushed up or down.."
#10. "Gravity has been replaced but it'll never be accepted because gravity is the magic that keeps the space shenanigans alive and kicking, not to mention the bull of an Earth spinning within it and us and water and what not, on it."
It is SO him.
Oh wow...
#11. "The suns energy inside Earth creates pressure veins or fissures. Think of it like a tree root pushing out but only super hot expanded molten energy from that central carbon arc sun core.
Ok, all of this stuff creates more expansion and that expansion pushed up through more dense matter and using the more dense matter below as the leverage to that push up."
...and surely the clincher...
#12. "I said the Earth is like an orange squeezer but not as severe and if you walked up it you would be walking up a gradient that rises over a long trek, IF it could be achieved.
Inside that would be the driving energy of a carbon arc covered by crystal, maybe more dense as diamond, plus metals of molten gold and silver, etc, as well as solids.
Make of that what you want to but the only thing coming out of the top would be the refraction/reflection onto a dome and back to our senses."
You must be logged on to see external links
And bump
Even the carbon arc was revealed as an appeal to authority from the 1800s when that was cutting edge technology.
That diagram looks familiar from earlier today.
Dense stacking up ya jacksieWhat’s a shag
Must've missed that one earlier
This diagram from the flat earth society website
The user called Sceptimatic in the post i showed from the flat earth site is nukehasslefan.
And they are right?
I'm just catching up and was about to do a reverse image search of his but that's saved me a job.
Think it might be him, similar arguments but slightly different language.
You have avoided the question. Are you able to actually answer it without distraction please. No vagaries, as your previous posted indicated, this is specific.
What does uniformly dense mean in terms of what I'm putting forward?
If you mean do I feel the need to question it, then no, it's not something that needs to be high on my list.
There's less of everything the higher you go. The pyramid should tell you that.
Molecules at sea level are much more densely packed and compressed.
As I said. It's a dome and what you see on Earth under it will vary depending on where each person is standing.
And atmosphere.
As in, how?
Whatever's reflected is in the realms of what we see. In my opinion.
The horizon is simply the vanishing point to your eyes. It becomes a theoretical line or an imaginary line.
Points of light maps are fine. They help navigation around the circle under the dome.
Why should they be inaccurate?
Very possible in this Earth and even on other similar Earths outside of this one.
Maybe. If it is somehow possible.
Not quite as primitive but you could well be on the right lines, even though it was tongue in cheek with you.
There's lots of stuff on this topic. Go through it and you'll get a better idea of what's what from my side.
