• The forum upgrades are now largely complete.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Should the Chanpionship be a Franchise competition?

success in what sense? If Sunderland moved to London and won the league, is that a success?

maybe for the players and owner but not for the fans like.
Finished on this. You disagree but I’m not getting involved any further . Just an opinion of mine and leave it at that
 

Finished on this. You disagree but I’m not getting involved any further . Just an opinion of mine and leave it at that

Just think you are missing the point we are making, I find it hard to believe that woud count as success for Sunderland considering the fans wouldnt support them
 
Just think you are missing the point we are making, I find it hard to believe that woud count as success for Sunderland considering the fans wouldnt support them
I’ve made a point that I don’t think franchise cricket in England will work, unlike in the ipl with a billion Indians following it.

the nfl is the most financially successful format of franchise sport there is on the planet

thats the point
 
Love the NFL but don't think it's a good comparison. There's more passionate support towards the college teams than the NFL sides and the number of American football fans outweighs the number of tickets available so it'll always be a success. Cricket in England doesn't have that luxury. Especially red ball
 
Love the NFL but don't think it's a good comparison. There's more passionate support towards the college teams than the NFL sides and the number of American football fans outweighs the number of tickets available so it'll always be a success. Cricket in England doesn't have that luxury. Especially red ball
Not comparing it but imo the NFL is the most successful franchise system on the planet.

now back to franchise cricket. I doubt very much that it will succeed in England and definitely not for county championship purposes
 
I personally would not franchise teams in England, but generalised statements like it’s all rubbish is clearly wide of the mark.

The IPL finished yesterday and apparently 105 thousand people watched in the ground the final.

I repeat 105 thousand for a cricket match, that’s success of a tournament in anybodys book.

And the fans seem as invested and as passionate and enjoy themselves as much as I have seen any cricket fan do.

That said don’t think it would be right for the English game to go down the franchise route.
 
I personally would not franchise teams in England, but generalised statements like it’s all rubbish is clearly wide of the mark.

The IPL finished yesterday and apparently 105 thousand people watched in the ground the final.

I repeat 105 thousand for a cricket match, that’s success of a tournament in anybodys book.

And the fans seem as invested and as passionate and enjoy themselves as much as I have seen any cricket fan do.

That said don’t think it would be right for the English game to go down the franchise route.
See my post above. Despite having franchised T20 they don't have franchised First Class cricket. They have 50+ teams in the Ranji Trophy which is highly successful in creating test teams.
 
See my post above. Despite having franchised T20 they don't have franchised First Class cricket. They have 50+ teams in the Ranji Trophy which is highly successful in creating test teams.
Yeah I agree thats why I said would not have it in England.

As don’t think the right fit.

It clearly is the right for T20 in India, it seems it’s not cool to admit the IPL has been a success or to praise brilliant cricketers in that tournament.

When imo it’s obviously is a massive success as fans are massively still passionate about their team, despite it been a franchise team that’s clear as day

But I agree with you one size does not fit all and franchise cricket should not be in red ball first class cricket and certainly not in England.

A earlier post said all franchise is shit that’s clearly wrong as the IPL could not have been a bigger success.
 
Last edited:
Australia has 1/3 the population of the UK and the majority of the country is uninhabitable


He's now arguing that the County XI battering new zealand proves his point about
Why were England so much than Australia and Pakistan in both formats up until the last few years then?
In test matches we had good solid openers, Strauss, Trescothick, Cook, bell in the middle order,

Other teams have caught up with the aggressive style of play that our 1 day side has played in recent years, I don’t believe we’ve gone on, we won 1 T20 World Cup in the Caribbean, and we won 1 50 over World Cup on a technicality. Hardly world domination.
Australia has 1/3 the population of the UK and the majority of the country is uninhabitable

Exactly what I was saying (trying to) , we have a bigger talent pool and
 
Last edited:
In test matches we had good solid openers, Strauss, Trescothick, Cook, bell in the middle order,

Other teams have caught up with the aggressive style of play that our 1 day side has played in recent years, I don’t believe we’ve gone on, we won 1 T20 World Cup in the Caribbean, and we won 1 50 over World Cup on a technicality. Hardly world domination.

Aye I know, but what I mean is, Australia didnt win an ashes for a long time, yet they have this supposed great system

just trying to make point not as easy as just limiting teams = better quality

Australia also a country which is a lot different geographically to England
 
Can’t bring myself to listen to that

It’s just Kevin Howells interviewing Neil Snowball who is FTECB’s Managing Director of County Cricket.

To summarise, he swerved every single difficult question, but the two main takeaways from that for me were:

  • Absolutely no plan whatsoever to play franchise red ball cricket - but of course the door was left open with regards more franchised white ball - repeated several times that the county structure with the history and heritage and loyalty of each and every club needs preserving.
  • Wouldn’t rule out a shortening (even further) of the red ball schedule.
He squirmed like f*ck when Howells put to him that it would royally piss off county members, who have remained loyal during a cost of living crisis but who would seriously question whether their membership was value for money if 14 CC games became 10.
 
I personally would not franchise teams in England, but generalised statements like it’s all rubbish is clearly wide of the mark.

The IPL finished yesterday and apparently 105 thousand people watched in the ground the final.

I repeat 105 thousand for a cricket match, that’s success of a tournament in anybodys book.

And the fans seem as invested and as passionate and enjoy themselves as much as I have seen any cricket fan do.

That said don’t think it would be right for the English game to go down the franchise route.
And I didn’t watch a single game. Because it’s shite

I couldn’t tell you who plays for who.

Generating money doesn’t equal good. Coldplay tell you that
 
Super Bowl champions. It worked. Still let’s leave it at that. Franchise cricket is all very ipl with a billion plus cricket addicts. In the U.K. it’s just not on

It’s a bad comparison because the entire structure in the States from junior to senior level is on another planet to what it is in this country.
 
And I didn’t watch a single game. Because it’s shite

I couldn’t tell you who plays for who.

Generating money doesn’t equal good. Coldplay tell you that
Each to their own mate, I watched loads and found it great to watch, cricket players playing to entertain, fans really enjoying themselves and been passionate about their team and their sport.

Nobody mentioned money or generating cash as a indication of success

What I mentioned is 105 thousand people wanting to watch a cricket final, and throughly enjoying themselves, that would not happen if the product was not good or more importantly not entertaining?


Not to mention the crowds and brilliant atmosphere throughout the tournament that all players playing in it comment on, that suggests it’s a success very much a success at least in India.

By very nature when you have the best players in the world in that format going head to head then of course it’s good, it’s churlish to say anything else.

What gets me on this subject is if exactly the same 22 players play out a T20 match in the blast it’s great entertainment, yet if the very same 22 players play in the IPL, with the same scores.

There is always a angle found on here to critcise it!!
 
Last edited:
Each to their own mate, I watched loads and found it great to watch, cricket players playing to entertain, fans really enjoying themselves and been passionate about their team and their sport.

Nobody mentioned money or generating cash as a indication of success

What I mentioned is 105 thousand people wanting to watch a cricket final, and throughly enjoying themselves, that would not happen if the product was not good?

Not to mention the crowds and brilliant atmosphere throughout the tournament that all players playing in it comment on, that suggests it’s a success very much a success at least in India.

By very nature when you have the best players in the world in that format going head to head then of course it’s good, it’s churlish to say anything else.

What gets me on this subject is if exactly the same 22 players play out a T20 match in the blast it’s great entertainment, yet if the very same 22 players play in the IPL, with the same scores.

There is always a angle found on here to critcise it!!
It’s entertainment. It’s highly skilled. But it’s utterly throwaway. I don’t care about it. I don’t know who plays for who. It’s entertaining but it’s contrived
 
It’s entertainment. It’s highly skilled. But it’s utterly throwaway. I don’t care about it. I don’t know who plays for who. It’s entertaining but it’s contrived
That’s fine mate that’s entirely your opinion and up to you.

But like you say it’s clearly highly skilled and entertaining and the fans over there absolutely love it!!

As do the players!!

So based of that this one franchise tournament just this one is clearly a massive success.

Don’t disagree with your arguments on other franchise tournaments and don’t want it in England either in the championship
 
Last edited:
There is no money in domestic first class cricket anywhere in the world it's only purpose is to produce cricketers for the respective international teams therefore a complete anathema to the concept of franchises.
The only way it survives is if it is funded By the governing bodies of each country.
 
Back
Top