• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

CC :: Durham v Nottinghamshire


He was warned by the umpire for it, man.
It was happening a lot until the umpire decided to warn him and be still continued. It was inevitable it was going to happen, he seemed to be targetting Trevaskis. First ball to Raine and he got warned again. I'm off for roughening up the batsman/aggressive but he was bowling dangerously in my opinion. There is a line and he crossed it and the umpires were too weak despite warnings. They will be delighted to get rid of our main spinner
This legit? What a bullshit rule. It actively rewards trying to concuss the opposition.
Which is exactly what they were trying to do
 
This legit? What a bullshit rule. It actively rewards trying to concuss the opposition.

It doesn’t at all

It massively helps Durham

England would have beaten Aussies on 2019 at lords without this rule
It was happening a lot until the umpire decided to warn him and be still continued. It was inevitable it was going to happen, he seemed to be targetting Trevaskis. First ball to Raine and he got warned again. I'm off for roughening up the batsman/aggressive but he was bowling dangerously in my opinion. There is a line and he crossed it and the umpires were too weak.

Which is exactly what they were trying to do

It doesn’t help then st all

The rule helps us

Without the rule he’d already be out and couldn’t bat again as he’s concust

We’d be a player down.

It helps the batting side not the bowling side
 
It doesn’t at all

It massively helps Durham

England would have beaten Aussies on 2019 at lords without this rule


It doesn’t help then st all

The rule helps us

Without the rule he’d already be out and couldn’t bat again as he’s concust

We’d be a player down.

It helps the batting side not the bowling side
The wicket is doing something for their spinner.... They have just concussed our main spinner out the game who was also batting well. Most definitely advantage Nottingham
 
The wicket is doing something for their spinner.... They have just concussed our main spinner out the game who was also batting well. Most definitely advantage Nottingham

No it’s not

He’s got concussion

He couldn’t bowl anyway

Without this rule we’d have been a player down

Now at least we can get someone to bat again too
 
How does it "massively help Durham"? We lose our best spinner for the rest of the match and have to sub in George Drissell.

You haven't thought this through and just being contrarian.

:lol:

Wtf is this a wind up?

He’s got concussion

You do realise he’d be out or the game on any scenario

At least now we get a replacement

It’s a massive advantage to us

Without it we’d have 10 players

Haha Christ
We'll agree to disagree
What you’re really saying here is that you’d play trev with concussion

Which nobody should agree with
 
:lol:

Wtf is this a wind up?

He’s got concussion

You do realise he’d be out or the game on any scenario

At least now we get a replacement

It’s a massive advantage to us

Without it we’d have 10 players

Haha Christ

What you’re really saying here is that you’d play trev with concussion

Which nobody should agree with
I never said we should continue to play Trev so you've made that up. I've merely said Nottingham in my opinion targetted Trev(see above comments) and he's now out of the game. For me that plan has worked (it was obvious) and we now lose our best spinner.
 
Back
Top