• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Roy Keane

Status
Not open for further replies.

We might cross paths at some point down the line. Not sure where our next one is. It’s the wife’s (no) and daughter’s also no) thing really. I’m just transport and I get us set up, film our bit in the ring, etc. I do enjoy it, but most of the time I just want to kip if I’m honest! :lol:
Bearing in mind all the crimes you've solved for Thames Valley Police over the years, I think you've earned the odd booze-induced coma....
 
Just completing the BAME protocols. Patience.
Tin hat on, but it’s a bit condescending and patronising, isn’t it? I understand why the rule exists, and it’s sad that in 2022 it even has to be discussed, but it doesn’t seem right to interview people when you’ve no intention of hiring them just to conform to a rule. It’s wasting everybody’s time.
 
Tin hat on, but it’s a bit condescending and patronising, isn’t it? I understand why the rule exists, and it’s sad that in 2022 it even has to be discussed, but it doesn’t seem right to interview people when you’ve no intention of hiring them just to conform to a rule. It’s wasting everybody’s time.
Completely agree, if I was black manager going for an interview I wouldn’t be able to help but think “am i here because they need me to be or because they like me as a manager”
 
Completely agree, if I was black manager going for an interview I wouldn’t be able to help but think “am i here because they need me to be or because they like me as a manager”

They're getting messed about really if you think about it. We want Keano, they know we want Keano why are they even bothering.
 
Tin hat on, but it’s a bit condescending and patronising, isn’t it? I understand why the rule exists, and it’s sad that in 2022 it even has to be discussed, but it doesn’t seem right to interview people when you’ve no intention of hiring them just to conform to a rule. It’s wasting everybody’s time.
Guess they feel it's better to have a rule like this rather than people have the opportunity to widely discriminate and ride roughshod over others, knowingly or not.
 
Tin hat on, but it’s a bit condescending and patronising, isn’t it? I understand why the rule exists, and it’s sad that in 2022 it even has to be discussed, but it doesn’t seem right to interview people when you’ve no intention of hiring them just to conform to a rule. It’s wasting everybody’s time.
The ongoing NFL case involving Brian Flores might prove interesting....
 
Have all of our resident ITKs gone a bit quiet? Not seen owt in the last little while (been dipping in and out so might have missed it) and doesn’t look like owt from “owa the road” either?
 
The EFL mandate that at least one person from a BAME background should be interviewed for any first team position when multiple candidates are involved. There are loopholes though - for example West Brom said that Bruce was the only candidate.
Yes, it’s a strange regulation that places BAME obligations on clubs but only when multiple candidates are being considered. Easy to ignore therefore
 
Tin hat on, but it’s a bit condescending and patronising, isn’t it? I understand why the rule exists, and it’s sad that in 2022 it even has to be discussed, but it doesn’t seem right to interview people when you’ve no intention of hiring them just to conform to a rule. It’s wasting everybody’s time.
I guess the view is that you have to force these things initially, so eventually you don't have to?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top