Put a flat earthier into space



Okay, I don’t think you did, but me asking again will get us nowhere.
Why, using your theory, does a small aircraft flying over a city not experience catastrophic turbulence as it flies through differing air pressures due to the varying mass of the buildings below?
Because pushes through the layers which cascade those layers over the top at speed which allows it to skim the dense air below while not allowing a crush back on the plane to crush it down.
It simple offers no bigger resistance to below the craft ensuring it skims the air below.

Like a pebble along water.
 

Because pushes through the layers which cascade those layers over the top at speed which allows it to skim the dense air below while not allowing a crush back on the plane to crush it down.
It simple offers no bigger resistance to below the craft ensuring it skims the air below.

Like a pebble along water.
Pebbles bounce across water we don't feel that in a plane.
You're not very good at analogies are you.
 
Ah right just yesterday you said it never stays perfectly stacked when I questioned how it stays in place outdoors yet @DaveH breath alone was messing up his whole data room stacking?

Post #9602 for reference
I still never offered it as perfectly stacked.
Your attempts at twisting fail miserably and do you no favours.
Pebbles bounce across water we don't feel that in a plane.
You're not very good at analogies are you.
Correct you hardly do in a plane. not that you notice much. Sometimes you do if you pay attention.

My analogies are fine for those who can actually use them without believing they're not analogies and are the real explanation. A bit like you.
 
Last edited:

Because pushes through the layers which cascade those layers over the top at speed which allows it to skim the dense air below while not allowing a crush back on the plane to crush it down.
It simple offers no bigger resistance to below the craft ensuring it skims the air below.

Like a pebble along water.

Your quoted response was just gibberish to be honest. A collection of words which amounted to nothing. Hence a request for clarification. Never mind.

As for your second reply, I don’t agree with how you envisage a aeroplane moves though air. If you have a 50 story skyscraper, it’s going to be anywhere between 180,000Te and 250,000Te. That magnitude of pressure would affect anything above it, including a person standing on the roof or a aeroplane flying above it.

You are also advocating that a city with varying height/ mass buildings would have significant changes in air pressure from one building to the street next to it to the next building along.
That would be chaos.
 
I still never offered it as perfectly stacked.
Your attempts at twisting fail miserably and do you no favours.
No but his breath in a pressure sealed room prevented stacking according to you and you were banging on about the floor having to be the same as the ceiling to make it work.
Yet outside with a solid ground below and nothing above, people and vehicles disrupting it, wind, rain, various weather and pressure changes yet ships still disappear in the same fashion at distance due to stacking?
How does it stay stacked during all of these changes in such layers accurate to say 30 ft changes of height?
 

Because pushes through the layers which cascade those layers over the top at speed which allows it to skim the dense air below while not allowing a crush back on the plane to crush it down.
It simple offers no bigger resistance to below the craft ensuring it skims the air below.

Like a pebble along water.
People who design planes and understand flight, don't. Thanks for helping us learn.
I still never offered it as perfectly stacked.
Your attempts at twisting fail miserably and do you no favours.

Correct you hardly do in a plane. not that you notice much. Sometimes you do if you pay attention.

My analogies are fine for those who can actually use them without believing they're not analogies and are the real explanation. A bit like you.
class sentence.
 
No but his breath in a pressure sealed room prevented stacking according to you and you were banging on about the floor having to be the same as the ceiling to make it work.
Yet outside with a solid ground below and nothing above, people and vehicles disrupting it, wind, rain, various weather and pressure changes yet ships still disappear in the same fashion at distance due to stacking?
How does it stay stacked during all of these changes in such layers accurate to say 30 ft changes of height?
perception through the eye with instant light through the lens via carboard tube with ankles under lapping sea water. I think
 
Correct you hardly do in a plane. not that you notice much. Sometimes you do if you pay attention.

My analogies are fine for those who can actually use them without believing they're not analogies and are the real explanation. A bit like you.
You get the odd bit turbulence but not as much as would happen in your theory and certainly not that violent.
I know what an analogy is, you're the one that struggles with word definitions fella.
 
So you think someone moving and breathing in a calm environment will not upset that environment?
We'll leave it there. No need for you to go on from this point.
So why isn't it affected outside which is much more volatile, why do ships still disappear in the same fashion repeatedly regardless of air and pressure disruption?
We'll cease correspondence from this point on.
You've beaten him @Kevj He has no answer
 
Last edited:

Back
Top