• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

NUFC Sportswashing 2022

Status
Not open for further replies.
mag in peace said:
Jesus wept, the above poster got it spot on. Abuse the club, abuse the owners by all account but that does not give you carte blanche to abuse all of the fans and call us rapists and sympathisers etc. I am assuming that is where you get your warnings because its a nonsense. It is the same as me calling you all nonces as Johnson played for you - its mental.

It is not a difficult concept to grasp really. There is no conspiracy.
Click to expand...
That’s a completely false analogy. Johnson was a club employee, was fired as soon as he was convicted, the CEO who covered up for him was fired and 99.9% of Sunderland fans hate the fucker.

Over 100 000 of you lot felt strongly enough to sign a petition begging to be owned by a fascist regime. That regime wanted to own you for sportswashing purposes. By continually defending and deflecting from the owners behaviour you are complicit in it.

So yes you are supporting the abuse of women, gay people and condoning the murder of Yemenese children.
 

AB22 Easy Tiger said:
You're paranoid. We all have the same standards and go by the rules.

terms
Click to expand...

So what would be the problem showing which Mods had handed out warnings or Bans, to Sunderland supporters on this thread and the previous one? there is a feeling one has been overzealous, even supportive of our stinking neighbours
BallY said:
Off we go to another 1000 page mag thread (not obsessed though).

I'm sick of seeing this thread top all the time.
Click to expand...


Have an ignore mag
 
mag in peace said:
Jesus wept, the above poster got it spot on. Abuse the club, abuse the owners by all account but that does not give you carte blanche to abuse all of the fans and call us rapists and sympathisers etc. I am assuming that is where you get your warnings because its a nonsense. It is the same as me calling you all nonces as Johnson played for you - its mental.

It is not a difficult concept to grasp really. There is no conspiracy. It is as simple as following the rules that have always existed.

Edit - the mods also did not start or name the thread.
Click to expand...
Don't you dare bring that up! It's absolutely disgraceful that you mags use that to score very cheap points against us. You need to look at your own clubs history with sexual abuse before you throw stones. It's disgraceful that you chose to throw a horrible subject like that at SAFC to try and get one over us.
 
PaddySAFC97 said:
Don't you dare bring that up! It's absolutely disgraceful that you mags use that to score very cheap points against us. You need to look at your own clubs history with sexual abuse before you throw stones. It's disgraceful that you chose to throw a horrible subject like that at SAFC to try and get one over us.
Click to expand...
:rolleyes: you know full well that was not why it was bought up. In fact, it was for the exact opposite of what you are waffling about.
 
jazz said:
Couldn't get in a poor spurs team man
Click to expand...
They could have the Liverpool back four but would still get beat with that midfield in front of them. Trippier will be hung out to dry if the don’t sign a top quality cdm to protect the defence.
 
BallY said:
I can remember the pure joy on here the day the murderous Saudi's apparently pulled out of the deal, I was one of them. To now pretending that we're not bothered is a bit silly. Just look at how many mag threads, posts and replies there have been since this was announced. By far the most popular thread on this forum.

Plus, we'd have been delighted had it been us so let's not kid outlrselves.

You must be logged on to see external links


We are sunderland, we'll be back!!
Click to expand...
Another smelling c##t arrived
 
Market Where? said:
Why did you bring it up? As I explained it’s a completely false analogy.

Deflect deflect deflect….
Click to expand...
I can't even answer this without being accused of something I'm not trying to do.

Elements of your fans actively sung 'he shags who he wants'. At no point would I ever dream of suggesting that all of you condone this type of behaviour and are therefore sympathisers. It's a mad stance to take.

You can only be held accountable for your own actions. I am actually trying to help you realise why you are getting warnings and you are just being a dick. I won't bother.
 
mag in peace said:
I can't even answer this without being accused of something I'm not trying to do.

Elements of your fans actively sung 'he shags who he wants'. At no point would I ever dream of suggesting that all of you condone this type of behaviour and are therefore sympathisers. It's a mad stance to take.

You can only be held accountable for your own actions. I am actually trying to help you realise why you are getting warnings and you are just being a dick. I won't bother.
Click to expand...
Our owners got rid of scumbag Johnson, our fans didn’t need to. Your owners cannot get rid of themselves, only the fans can get rid of them (like you did with fat Mike).

That’s only if you want to get rid of them mind, only if you aren’t morally bankrupt. I suspect you are though
 
mag in peace said:
I can't even answer this without being accused of something I'm not trying to do.

Elements of your fans actively sung 'he shags who he wants'. At no point would I ever dream of suggesting that all of you condone this type of behaviour and are therefore sympathisers. It's a mad stance to take.

You can only be held accountable for your own actions. I am actually trying to help you realise why you are getting warnings and you are just being a dick. I won't bother.
Click to expand...
Funny how you avoided my post.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top