Already have but it's not to your taste because you'd like to have some kind of ultra sensitive equipment, somehow, to verify it. Whatever that sensitive equipment is, I'm not sure. Are you?
Yep
Still think he believes this stuff.
Problem is he has had his arguments totally deconstructed and is out of his depth.
Absolutely not.
The only way he is able to respond is to double down into repetition and trolling, which has been clear in the way he has been posting since the end of last week.
This is the general go to piece when the argument weakens and the en masse attempts at ridicule have next to zero effect.
Atmospheric dense barrier (a new term he has created) can be measured in any unit you choose, but is apparently a real thing and is part of an equation with distance. A prime example of his new trolling
I say measure it because you can use whatever you wish. You know it's there so use what reference there is to it.
@Nukehasslefan can you tell us what instruments (if any) you used in your water level experiment.
It was also stated that the curvature over 6ft would not be observable with the naked eye, do you agree or disagree with that?
I've explained plenty of tests.
Do you reject everything you don't understand and come up with alternative narratives that 'seem right' to you.
Nope. I accept a lot. Acceptance does not mean I believe it, it just means I have no reason or need at the time to question it.
I'm here for science. It's a dirty job but someone's got to do it. We can't have brainwashed idiot pseudoscientists running wild spreading their lies unchallenged.
I have to challenge. It would be a sorry world if people just believed everything without proof.
Cumulative air? Like the effects of fog?
That's one.
But the atmosphere is effectively a fluid..... and over distance the mass of that fluid builds and blocks out more and more light back to the eye.
What do you estimate the normal visible rage to be then before this inhibits viewing an injustice in a direct line of sight?
That depends on the atmospheric set up, whether it's a hot climate or a mild climate or a cold to freezing. There's many variations.
Our main sight to the theoretical horizon line can be in range of a few miles but objects above that theoretical horizon line can be 10's or even 100's of miles away depending on size and the actual position of the observer to a high point.
So many variations but they all boils down to atmospheric stacking. It's just about putting your mind to it.
For about the 10th time
@Nukehasslefan what experiments did you do to show the centre was made of crystals and not something else?
Lots of stuff that's in our faces.
Try and put your mind to it.
It requires you to actually dig deeper so I don't waste my time explaining stuff that will be just laughed at.
Offer something if you're interested.
Out your model aside for a bit and treat it like an exercise for you.
You must be bored looking for back pats and stuff for digs, surely.
