Binxy
Striker
Well I'll do your washing.
But separate yours out
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well I'll do your washing.
But separate yours out
Saudi Arabia has always been a dictatorship but traditionally run as a collective family affair.
Since MBS became Crown Prince it has been moving slowly towards a one man tyranny with even royals that stand in his way been pushed aside, even though his dad is still nominally King.
When King Salman (85) finally dies it will be interesting to see how far MBS goes to punish any high level rivals to his power and if he will even try to be subtle about it. Business as usual or Saddam type bloodbath ?
Seems the mags are more at home defending genocidal, homophobic murderers than allowing someone to use a series of digits to support a food bank.I mean you’d think the daft fucker would have checked before setting up a businessShe appeared on Wraiths show last week so no sympathy
You must be logged on to see media items
I mean you’d think the daft fucker would have checked before setting up a businessShe appeared on Wraiths show last week so no sympathy
You must be logged on to see media items
No grounds.Did anyone else hear Christian Purslow’s interview on R4 Today this morning? He is Chief Exec of Aston Villa and was talking about the Fan Led Review and need for a regulator.
When he was asked if a regulator would have blocked the Saudi takeover he categorically said no. His view was that because UK government policy is that Saudi Arabia is an ally or partner there would be no grounds for a regulator to block it.
![]()
![]()
I’m trying to process this. The tax I pay goes towards weapons companies selling arms to the KSA? I thought the Saudis as buyers would have to pay for them. Unless there’s some kind of Black Friday deal on bombs n bullets and we’re subsidising it. Then he says our government are buying weapons and selling them to the KSA. If theres any sense in there I can’t find it.
And they wonder why the rest of the country either despises them or takes the piss out of their ignorance and stupidity,
or both.
They could always re-brand as 1992Seems the mags are more at home defending genocidal, homophobic murderers than allowing someone to use a series of digits to support a food bank.
Ah the people’s club, all of this investment in the nashun and someone’s not allowed their preferred name for a clothing range.I mean you’d think the daft fucker would have checked before setting up a businessShe appeared on Wraiths show last week so no sympathy
You must be logged on to see media items
This is how sports washing worksMaybe when they set up, they didn’t think they’d actually have to stand up and fight for what they believed in.
They had a once in a lifetime opportunity to make a massive statement for equality and inclusivity but they didn’t have the guts.
Money trumps morals again if you’re a mag.
In their "new" song, I was thinking Monty Python's Life of BrianAgain the paying tax argument falls flat because the British taxpayer didn't actively encourage the sale of arms to the Saudi's. Newcastle fans sent a petition which was double the stadium capacity to demand this takeover to go through.. then dancing around with the headwear looking like something from a Spike Milligan sketch...![]()
Very worrying.Crouch’s answer was as weak as piss mind…
The manufacture of carrier bags needs hydrocarbons. The Saudis sell oil. So aye mate. We are all guilty in the court of worrabooteryBreathing fresh air or paying for a 5p carrier bag in Asda is tantamount to terrorism next I imagine.
Good shout.They could always re-brand as 1992![]()
The closer to Sid James’ park you get, the higher the concentration of utter cretins you’ll encounter, It’s the inverse square law of bellends.The mags must have more utter schmucks per capita than anywhere else on the planet.
The closer to Sid James’ park you get, the higher the concentration of utter cretins you’ll encounter, It’s the inverse square law of bellends.
Know posted with emoji anyway - intel had 386, 486 microchips but because you cant copyright numbers they released the pentium. Imagine "United 1892" could be copyright but not the number itself otherwise every bus company / calendar maker in the country would be a knackered and doubt man utd would be happy if united was copyrighted.You can copyright a year!!!!???? I'll have 1879, 1973 and 2026![]()
Take a bow mateYou must be logged on to see media items