It's easy to mix the two up when you are schooled.
Put a flat earthier into space
- Thread starter southstander
- Start date
It's easy to mix the two up when you are schooled.
So we can see tiny dot reflections from the dome/energy source far into the distance yet we can't look up and see the huge main reflection these originate from glowing in the night sky, how is that?
I can't draw it because it can't be drawn the way you explain it, how many times, any gradual slope over that distance would mean super deep seas in the lower bowl. Scale works no matter what, certainly on a sloping cross section of an imaginary world in your head, if you can visualise what none of us can then draw it in proportion, it's like dealing with a child.
The Snockerty Friddle
Winger
At last, we have a sensible and understandable explanation for solar eclipses that everyone can believe in and ... wait... what?
The Fish
Winger
Wolfy still hawking his Denpressure bollocks, I see.
He's impervious to evidence, logic and reason.
Makes outlandish claims, then when challenged just shrugs his shoulders and says "That's what I believe".
Refuses to provide any evidence to back his claims that holds up to the tiniest scrutiny.
Refuses to perform any experiments that would shatter his world view.
All the while he claims everyone else is suffering with entrenched beliefs.
Honestly think that this is his attempt to have a personality.
He's impervious to evidence, logic and reason.
Makes outlandish claims, then when challenged just shrugs his shoulders and says "That's what I believe".
Refuses to provide any evidence to back his claims that holds up to the tiniest scrutiny.
Refuses to perform any experiments that would shatter his world view.
All the while he claims everyone else is suffering with entrenched beliefs.
Honestly think that this is his attempt to have a personality.
fyl2u
Striker
Your exercise here is to close your mind to anything that disproves your wacky notions and "open your mind" to things that are provably and obviously wrong to anyone that is able to think for themselves.
Nukehasslefan
Winger
What causes this with your globe?
The reality is, you should be able to show me proof of your spinning globe. Can you?
Absolutely and also a big difference in pressures at sea level, against what's up at the dome.
You know when you feel heat on your body? It's due to molecules being agitated under dense pressure of atmosphere.
You know why it's so cold for us the higher we go up? It's because the pressure is much less upon us and does not agitate anywhere near as much because matter is more expanded and less of it, meaning our bodies do not agitate under density, enough to keep us warm.
So what causes them.
Can you explain what's happening from your understanding?
Last edited:
The Snockerty Friddle
Winger
The spherical Moon is lit by the spherical Sun and so as it moves around the spherical Earth we see different portions of it in sunlight at different times. Sometimes we see none of it as only the side facing away from us is lit.
Nukehasslefan
Winger
Because the sun reflection is not hitting the parts you see which means it becomes dark. The reflection will be aimed at another of the dome and back to the Earth.
No problem.
The moon orbits the earth, which in turn orbits the sun. The part of the moon that faces us is illuminated by the sun. As the moon orbits the earth over 28 days it goes from being fully in shadow to partially illuminated (waxing crescent) and so on.
About this sunlight reflection.
As we are into winter now, how can it be that the central energy crystal funzone (north of us) can light us up in England, whilst also lighting new zealand, south africa and Argentina at the same time, yet by 4pm for us it is getting dark but sttil daylight for those 3 places, and at the same time as well? These places being at the southern most points of their respective continents and if it was a clock on your celldisc, they'd be at 3 6 and 9.
Is the light reflection in the shape of an anchor?
Last edited:
DaveH
Striker
Ah a reflection that looks different.
So like when you reflect a shire horse in a mirror and get a cocker spaniel. Got it, makes sense now.
Wavelength is just a word. Given you don't believe in the EM spectrum, it is literally just a word thrown into it.
What is the source of the wavelength and how does it cancel itself out. Why can't this be demonstrated in any way?
Last edited:
Must be made of the same mirrors as them ones at south shields funfair
But if I look all around me somewhere exposed I can see stars to my left, right, front and behind and directly above so I must be able to see the point where the energy beam hits the dome then beams all of these dots out
Dense atmospheric carbon arc refraction
Last edited:
Transit of the moon
Transit of the sun
Transit of the stars
The tides
The seasons
The change of angle of shadows
The prevailing wind
The flight path of aeroplanes
The horizon and the voyage of ships
Images from aeroplanes
Images from space
Yeah but apart from those
DaveH
Striker
Don't forget, it is not just the naked eye change of phase, the shadows around craters change, a little example here:
Logon or register to see this image
Full article: Observe the ever-changing Moon - Astronomical Society of Edinburgh
For example, look at the two quarter moons in your image above (where it looks like a semi-circle) from our point of view. The sun lights the moon from different sides as the phases change, which is what would give that quarter moon effect and you can repeat it with a torch, ball and a dark room. Clearly if you had crater walls, mountains etc, they would be illuminated from the other side. That side closer to the sun would be lighter and shadows would fall in the opposite direction.
And that is exactly what happens as demonstrated from the images above.
So on one side we have the moon is in orbit of the earth and both go round the sun, with the moon having features on that you can see, and this is all repeatable on a small scale (nasty word there) with an artificial light source and either a model or just a ball with a few bits of blutac. You can predict the whole cycle using fairly basic maths (more nasty words) and this has all been predicted for over 2000 years.
Or on the other side we have the sun and moon are secondary reflections on a dome which reflects light in a way that domes do not normally reflect light, where for some unexplained reason the light splits and while part of the sun shines back down on earth, the light splits off and forms the image we see as the the moon. This reflection looks nothing like the thing it has reflected from but behaves in an exactly consistent manor of a ball going round another ball. None of this can be repeated with a home or lab experiment and from what I can tell, nobody has reported this being real or possible since the dawn of time. And of course the old chestnut that if the dome was real and the moon was not, all those people who have been involved in sending things to the moon, sending things up into space, bouncing lasers off the moon or receiving/tracking signals of craft on or around the moon, are all telling big whopping lies. That is over 100 world governments and now a number of private companies.
Ok, I'm biased but the weighting really is in favour of reality on this one. Sorry paranoid morons.
Yeah yeah, I know, it is just my globe mindset that I can't see how the impossible is possible and that whole wave away comment negates anything said above. Just like 'project fear' instantly negated any downsides of Brexit.
Telescopes that can observe the moon clearly would also be able to see the dome
No they couldn't, it doesn't exist
Last edited:
