• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Put a flat earthier into space

taipeisafc said:
Time and dates are man made that must be the stupidest thing (and it is a crowded field) written on here it shows a complete lack of understanding of basic concepts time exists it we didnt call a day a day it would still be the same just not called a day. You are really clueless
Click to expand...
What is time?
What are dates?
Man made concepts that offer nothing more than routine.
ned_werby said:
@Nukehasslefan - if no-one has ever seen/visited the light/heat/everything source (because it's too inhospitable to get there) then how do you know how it exists and what it does?
Click to expand...
I don't know it exists. I believe it's a possibility based on experiments and visuals.
I don't expect anyone to give it a second thought but if they decide to then people can trey to understand why it could be like this and why it in my honest opinion, it's certainly not a spinning globe we supposedly walk upon.

What it is in its entirety and as a reality will only be known if we can ever see that reality, which I suspect we will not.
 
Last edited:

Nukehasslefan said:
If the atmosphere doesn't exist in perfect harmony with the Earth's crust then the global spinning Earth is rendered useless because that's what has to be the story in order to make us believe we see what we actually observe in reality.

What we really observe is a stationary Earth with atmosphere that moves in all directions depending on pressure changes and is also why helicopters can hover and not see ground move underneath.
Click to expand...

Wind patterns are far more complex phenomena and are influenced by many factors. However, the general direct of wind is to to the rotation of the earth. I’m sure you’re experienced wind in your life? And I’m also sure you’ve experienced a calm, still day.

Go outside and watch the sun traverse the sky. As it does in a predictable manner everyday of every year following the same trajectory based on the time of year and inclination of the earth.

Everything that has been put forward on this thread tied together in synchrony. Your musings are littered with inaccuracies and contradiction.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
I don't know it exists. I believe it's a possibility based on experiments and visuals.
Click to expand...
I don't know where to begin with this. Correct me if I'm wrong but you appear to have formulated a world view based on something you only believe to a possibility, and cannot prove, yet deny the - let's generalise for a moment - 'scientifically' demonstrated visible evidence of the existence around you?
 
Nukehasslefan said:
They come from the centre and are splayed out from it. There are no clouds at the centre.
Click to expand...
But if I say go to keilder on a clear night I can see stars right above me but also to my right and left until my eyes can then see land so those low ones must be being protected at a very low angle from the centre so if a cloud was even many miles from the centre it would still be in the way and the light source should show on it?
Same as if I stood next to or behind a mountain I could still see stars almost at eye level to my left but no way of the light from the centre passing through the mountain?
 
legend7 said:
But if I say go to keilder on a clear night I can see stars right above me but also to my right and left until my eyes can then see land so those low ones must be being protected at a very low angle from the centre so if a cloud was even many miles from the centre it would still be in the way and the light source should show on it?
Same as if I stood next to or behind a mountain I could still see stars almost at eye level to my left but no way of the light from the centre passing through the mountain?
Click to expand...

In that post alone you've already put more thought into this than NutCasellFan has.
 
Schmarrnbeppi said:
I think this thread needs locking tbf. The lad is going to do himself an injury here.
Click to expand...
I think the damage was done 15 years ago tbh unfortunately
Nukehasslefan said:
I don't know it exists. I believe it's a possibility based on experiments and visuals.
Click to expand...
What experiments have you done to show the crystal energy source inhospitable area exists, must have missed these somehow......
 
Last edited:
Nukehasslefan said:
I can see how ridiculous the train argument is when putting it up against a global Earth spin.

How about you explain it nice and simple.
How air manages to spin in exact unison with a solid as we are told is happening on Earth.

How do you know you haven't?

Any chance you can explain it?

Not one we walk upon and especially not spinning. IMO

It's not flat all over but water is. IMO

I don't believe it does.

I don't believe so.

Potentially, yes.

Potentially, yes.

I don't believe so.

Potentially, yes.

Yes.

It's one proof.

Points of light.

Yep, including myself at one time.

8 inches per mile squared is a close approximation for the size given for a global Earth.

That depends on what that stuff is.

Yep.

I don't believe so, no.

It would have to going by the fictional model displayed to us.

Not in the way we're told.

Plenty of circumstantial evidence but no proof of facts.

Light is the result of friction. Friction is the cause of sound. We see the light and hear the sound.
The light to our eyes is instant. The sound to our ears is dependent on waves reaching them.

Yep.

Scale is scale.

A horizon line does not exist. It's theoretical.

You see a theoretical horizon line due to eye level sight.

Natural stacking of dense to less dense molecules/matter.

Geometry is fine for reality.

There are no stars.

There are no planets.

Potentially, yes.

It can't work. It's fiction, IMO.

Correct there is no proof of what I say about my Earth potential and I offer none.
You don't even need to give it one second of your thought.

They come from the centre and are splayed out from it. There are no clouds at the centre.

And yet a plane will head into atmosphere and create friction.
A so called spinning ball of solid and liquid just happens to carry along an atmosphere in perfect unison.
This means it has to skim the atmosphere at the crust and seas and carry it all along with the Earth.

Any idea how that works?
I have a few more questions depending on the answer.
Click to expand...
I don’t think I can explain it any better than that thread I posted and I don’t think I can explain anything to you. I do not have that ability.

But lets look at what you think is wrong. You talk a lot about this spinning at 1000mph. Where do you get that number from?
 
The Snockerty Friddle said:
It's a shame you're not going to watch this, it has some really good stuff about scale

You must be logged on to see media items
Click to expand...
Just got round to watching that. There is a pretty good explanation of view to the horizon, what a horizon is and field of view, from about 17 minutes in. The bloke is a bit annoying and his bit about smoothness gets waffly, but it picks up again. @Nukehasslefan , try watching from17 mins, it explains quite a few of the concepts you have been struggling with.

The nice thing is, you can actually test the same with a small camera and a large ball. It is only the scale that is different.
 
Nearly 5,500 posts, no proof of a flat earth at all, about 1000 rebuttals from one bloke despite sound debate, argument and logic indeed then a level of defiant, deluded ‘intelligence’ that is all too common these days.

What a thread !

Gold
 
DaveH said:
Just got round to watching that. There is a pretty good explanation of view to the horizon, what a horizon is and field of view, from about 17 minutes in. The bloke is a bit annoying and his bit about smoothness gets waffly, but it picks up again. @Nukehasslefan , try watching from17 mins, it explains quite a few of the concepts you have been struggling with.

The nice thing is, you can actually test the same with a small camera and a large ball. It is only the scale that is different.
Click to expand...
Scale doesn't work at large sizes
 
DaveH said:
I don’t think I can explain it any better than that thread I posted and I don’t think I can explain anything to you. I do not have that ability.

But lets look at what you think is wrong. You talk a lot about this spinning at 1000mph. Where do you get that number from?
Click to expand...
from Science, common sense and maths... earth's circumference and a day are the measurements needed

thort you might learn from this:

The earth rotates once every 23 hours, 56 minutes and 4.09053 seconds, called the sidereal period, and its circumference is roughly 40,075 kilometers. Thus, the surface of the earth at the equator moves at a speed of 460 meters per second--or roughly 1,000 miles per hour.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top