• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

ALL NUFC and Sportwashing stuff in here. (Threads will be merged)

Status
Not open for further replies.
rocky said:
This takeover has been superb tbh. They're absolutely despised.
Click to expand...
They've all lost their heads (no pun intended). Look at the lgbt group; actively supporting a takeover by a group that would gladly see such groups eradicated.

Mind, most sane mags must surely be cringing at the way some of the more extreme elements of their support, such as wraith, have carried on.
 

North Yorks Mackem said:
They've all lost their heads (no pun intended). Look at the lgbt group; actively supporting a takeover by a group that would gladly see such groups eradicated.

Mind, most sane mags must surely be cringing at the way some of the more extreme elements of their support, such as wraith, have carried on.
Click to expand...
It’s time they made themselves heard then. Otherwise “silence is consent”
 
Wait until the stepping aside from buying Mbappe stories start, and the Saudi bots justify it to the Mags complaining.
It’ll be comedy gold watching them turn themselves in knots to agree with the excuses for not signing him.
The same as they’ve convinced themselves Beheddie was the manager they’ve dreamt of having all of their lives
 
Grumpy Old Man said:
His "argument" doesn't remotely stand up to philosophical scrutiny (source: GOM Jr PhD - moral and political philosophy). There are valid moral philosophical arguments around whether behaviours are morally right or wrong. However, once general agreement is reached, say we agree that it is fundamentally wrong to throw homosexuals from the top of tall buildings, then that is a moral absolute. To change a moral response to a behaviour as a result of external events is not moral behaviour, and is more akin to sociopathy. It's becoming wearisome having to explain this repeatedly to ill-informed Mags.
Click to expand...


And that’s the thing right. Newcastle fans are deluded and trying to shut out the voice deep inside telling them that what they are saying is horseshit and corrupted. This behaviour taken to an extreme leads to sociopathy. I feel when ever anyone replies to the mags on here they are in fact just trying to stop a deluded mag from becoming a sociopath. It’s deep rooted though in their culture, goes back 100s of years.

“In the epoch before the 1600s, King Charles I had consistently awarded the East of England Coal Trade Rights (try to contain your excitement) to Newcastle's traders, which rendered the Wearside coal merchants redundant. People died because of it. Coal and ships were Sunderland's raison d'etre.”

It’s the equivalent of someone’s mother giving her special little boy or girl too much love and them developing an overinflated view of themselves. Leading to them lacking in empathy for others because they think they are better than others. Its similar to the psychology of all those privileged public schools that are feeding schools for oxford and Cambridge. Breeding emotionless psychopaths who get told their whole lives they are better than anyone else and them then running banks of indeed our country (ala Boris Johnson or David Cameron). When they have the emotional development of a slab of concrete and indeed should be the last people to get jobs that’s decisions effect broader society.

#magsarethetoriesofthenorth
 
red mackem said:
And that’s the thing right. Newcastle fans are deluded and trying to shut out the voice deep inside telling them that what they are saying is horseshit and corrupted. This behaviour taken to an extreme leads to sociopathy. I feel when ever anyone replies to the mags on here they are in fact just trying to stop a deluded mag from becoming a sociopath. It’s deep rooted though in their culture, goes back 100s of years.

“In the epoch before the 1600s, King Charles I had consistently awarded the East of England Coal Trade Rights (try to contain your excitement) to Newcastle's traders, which rendered the Wearside coal merchants redundant. People died because of it. Coal and ships were Sunderland's raison d'etre.”

It’s the equivalent of someone’s mother giving her special little boy or girl too much love and them developing an overinflated view of themselves. Leading to them lacking in empathy for others because they think they are better than others. Its similar to the psychology of all those privileged public schools that are feeding schools for oxford and Cambridge. Breeding emotionless psychopaths who get told their whole lives they are better than anyone else and them then running banks of indeed our country (ala Boris Johnson or David Cameron). When they have the emotional development of a slab of concrete and indeed should be the last people to get jobs that’s decisions effect broader society.

#magsarethetoriesofthenorth
Click to expand...
I can see how a bit of genocide wouldn’t trouble them unduly. It’s in their DNA
 
There's an interesting conundrum in all of this for the Skunks. They've now got what they want, rid of evil Mike Ashley and are the 'richest club in the world'. They've sacked the despised Steve Bruce and appointed lovely, cuddly Beheaddie Howe, rather than Frank Lampard or Steven Gerrard. They have a substantial transfer fund with a transfer window opening shortly. On the available media evidence, both social and mainstream, they support their owners whole-heartedly and willingly. Everything is set for them. If however, they don't achieve PL titles, or cup wins in the next 5-10 years will they finally just accept it, after all they only want a team which 'tries', or will they rebel (once again) and try to oust PFI/RBs/AS? Is there a viable argument for complaint when you have everything you wanted? Put simply, now they are the most reviled supporters and football club in the world, are they happy?
 
red mackem said:
And that’s the thing right. Newcastle fans are deluded and trying to shut out the voice deep inside telling them that what they are saying is horseshit and corrupted. This behaviour taken to an extreme leads to sociopathy. I feel when ever anyone replies to the mags on here they are in fact just trying to stop a deluded mag from becoming a sociopath. It’s deep rooted though in their culture, goes back 100s of years.

“In the epoch before the 1600s, King Charles I had consistently awarded the East of England Coal Trade Rights (try to contain your excitement) to Newcastle's traders, which rendered the Wearside coal merchants redundant. People died because of it. Coal and ships were Sunderland's raison d'etre.”

It’s the equivalent of someone’s mother giving her special little boy or girl too much love and them developing an overinflated view of themselves. Leading to them lacking in empathy for others because they think they are better than others. Its similar to the psychology of all those privileged public schools that are feeding schools for oxford and Cambridge. Breeding emotionless psychopaths who get told their whole lives they are better than anyone else and them then running banks of indeed our country (ala Boris Johnson or David Cameron). When they have the emotional development of a slab of concrete and indeed should be the last people to get jobs that’s decisions effect broader society.

#magsarethetoriesofthenorth
Click to expand...
👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
 
Nukehasslefan said:
First of all I have no desire to take Saudi flags or wear Saudi headdress or promote anything that is deemed atrocious.
I can't help who takes the club over regardless of whether people think I can.
I can stop supporting and being a fan of Newcastle United to appease people...but I won't. I won't because I'm a Newcastle United supporter and fan and have been nigh on all my life barring being too young to know.
I'll keep saying this, as and when I'm pulled up.

If Newcastle supporters are on the end of the digs then they're going to counter those digs. It's only normal to do so.

I'm not defending it but I'm accused of defending it.
Why?
Because I'm using counter arguing about morals when people try to use smaller percentage ownership against larger percentage and saying there's a cut off point where it doesn't count as partaking for them and so their morals are intact.


Fine and it's so easy to say this for anyone.
We can all say whatever we want about anything if it's not happening to us. The proof is in the pudding and the eating of it when it does happen, to see what's really what.
You may have a stance where you genuinely know you'd give up your club if it happened. I'd suggest most wouldn't and the ground would fill up even if there was an initial stance against.

It literally is the nature of the beast within us.
It doesn't mean anyone has to openly, vocally support a regime that's deemed atrocious.
Click to expand...
I literally say in my post that I wouldn't give up my club if it happened so fuck knows what you're on about. And by doing the whataboutery you are defending them, you're trying to shut down discussion about them. And as I've clearly said, it's not the fact you're giving them money which is the only way the uber argument makes sense, it's the fact they are using this purchase to improve their image. It isn't the same thing which I've clearly stated several times. We're going round in circles because you're choosing to build straw men and misread my posts. Just leave it, you've said your bit, it's boring as fuck getting notifications to read the same shit
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top