• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Put a flat earthier into space


Oh for fucks sake!
I'm not saying there's a central star.
This is deliberate misunderstanding to deflect.
You said your central star is 12 o'clock or 6 o'clock.
So if that's not the case then what are you talking about?
Well first of all posting on a Sunderland board and secondly arguing for a point you don’t believe in.
I like the forum and the people on it and it seems I'm ok to post on it.

As for arguing a point I don't believe in. What's that?.......A globe?
It's a debate.
 
Last edited:
You said your central star is 12 o'clock or 6 o'clock.
So if that's not the case then what are you talking about?

I like the forum and the people on it and it seems I'm ok to post on it.

As for arguing a point I don't believe in. What's that?.......A globe?
It's a debate.
It’s not a debate. You’re arguing against a fact. Nobody would ever agree to something so ridiculous
 
It’s not a debate. You’re arguing against a fact.

If I was arguing against facts then it wouldn't be getting debated.
The thing is, you believe I'm arguing against facts because you believe the stories told like many do and those stories are put out as officially factual.
The reality is, you do not know for sure if they are because you have no way of proving they are, hence the forum debate.
Nobody would ever agree to something so ridiculous
That depends.
 
You said your central star is 12 o'clock or 6 o'clock.
So if that's not the case then what are you talking about?
No I did not. What I said was...
" you know what a clock looks like! Imagine your central projector is displaying a sort of a clock face onto the dome.
12 is directly overhead, with 9 and 3 opposite each other at the base of the dome.
Draw a diagram to explain how someone in UK sees 9,10,11,12,1,2 and 3 while someone in Australia sees 3,4,5,6,7,8 and 9."

Then you went off into your fake misunderstanding routine hoping the whole thing would vanish into the increasing layers of density.

Logon or register to see this image
 
If I was arguing against facts then it wouldn't be getting debated.
The thing is, you believe I'm arguing against facts because you believe the stories told like many do and those stories are put out as officially factual.
The reality is, you do not know for sure if they are because you have no way of proving they are, hence the forum debate.

That depends.
Pack it in man.
No I did not. What I said was...
" you know what a clock looks like! Imagine your central projector is displaying a sort of a clock face onto the dome.
12 is directly overhead, with 9 and 3 opposite each other at the base of the dome.
Draw a diagram to explain how someone in UK sees 9,10,11,12,1,2 and 3 while someone in Australia sees 3,4,5,6,7,8 and 9."

Then you went off into your fake misunderstanding routine hoping the whole thing would vanish into the increasing layers of density.
Don’t humour him man. He’s laughing at you for biting mate
 
No I did not. What I said was...
" you know what a clock looks like! Imagine your central projector is displaying a sort of a clock face onto the dome.
12 is directly overhead, with 9 and 3 opposite each other at the base of the dome.
Draw a diagram to explain how someone in UK sees 9,10,11,12,1,2 and 3 while someone in Australia sees 3,4,5,6,7,8 and 9."

Then you went off into your fake misunderstanding routine hoping the whole thing would vanish into the increasing layers of density.

Logon or register to see this image
That doesn't work like you portray it.
Are you looking at this clock from a time lapse point of view of your stars as if you're looking forward?

If so, what's your point?
 
What rocket fuel are you thinking of?
Erm, you tell me. I was thinking about all rocket fuel used in any form of space travel that you claim can not exist.

You seem to be making the strong suggestion that you have burned rocket fuel in a low pressure environment, so you tell us.

Here is a recap of the conversation if it helps:
Friday 9:58 AM - Nukehasslefan
I could go into all kinds of reasons as to why I believe it to be faked in terms of what they tell us and show us.
The simplest reason for any of it is, rockets cannot fly in the environment they say space is. That alone kills it off without all the rest of the dodgy suspicious stuff that stands out.

Friday 10:02 AM - DaveH
Have you tried burning rocket fuel in the environment of space, or is this just a wild guess because it doesn't sound to you like it would work?

Friday 10:36 AM - Nukehasslefan
Just trying it in extreme low pressure is enough.

Friday 12:03pm
DaveH:
What? You have burned rocket fuel in extreme low pressures? Can you say where you got hold of the rocket fuel, where you got it from? How did you create the extreme low pressures?

Do you still have the equipment to do a short video? That would be amazing to see and repeat.

Saturday 08:2 AM - Nukehasslefan
What rocket fuel are you thinking of?
So, repeated question, how do you know you can't burn rocket fuel in space and if you have tried it in a low pressure environment, tell us what you used, how you got hold of it and how you did your experiment?

Or is this just another guess?
 
Maybe take some time to make a sketch like you did of the...oh...
Or show the experiments you did to prove water can't .... Ah right sorry
I can promise you one thing. I will never believe a spinning globe again unless someone offers me proof and that cannot be done because it's plain and clear it is not a spinning globe.
Just bumping this to show how closed his mind is and how he will make any shit up to defend his position
 
Last edited:
Back
Top