The Snockerty Friddle
Winger
Oh for fucks sake!You still can't have your central star at the 12 or 6 o'clock position.
I'm not saying there's a central star.
This is deliberate misunderstanding to deflect.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh for fucks sake!You still can't have your central star at the 12 or 6 o'clock position.
Doing what?Why are you doing this?
Well first of all posting on a Sunderland board and secondly arguing for a point you don’t believe in.Doing what?
You said your central star is 12 o'clock or 6 o'clock.Oh for fucks sake!
I'm not saying there's a central star.
This is deliberate misunderstanding to deflect.
I like the forum and the people on it and it seems I'm ok to post on it.Well first of all posting on a Sunderland board and secondly arguing for a point you don’t believe in.
It’s not a debate. You’re arguing against a fact. Nobody would ever agree to something so ridiculousYou said your central star is 12 o'clock or 6 o'clock.
So if that's not the case then what are you talking about?
I like the forum and the people on it and it seems I'm ok to post on it.
As for arguing a point I don't believe in. What's that?.......A globe?
It's a debate.
It’s not a debate. You’re arguing against a fact.
That depends.Nobody would ever agree to something so ridiculous
You still can't have your central star at the 12 or 6 o'clock position.
Are you calling him a liar?
It’s not a debate. You’re arguing against a fact. Nobody would ever agree to something so ridiculous
No I did not. What I said was...You said your central star is 12 o'clock or 6 o'clock.
So if that's not the case then what are you talking about?
Pack it in man.If I was arguing against facts then it wouldn't be getting debated.
The thing is, you believe I'm arguing against facts because you believe the stories told like many do and those stories are put out as officially factual.
The reality is, you do not know for sure if they are because you have no way of proving they are, hence the forum debate.
That depends.
Don’t humour him man. He’s laughing at you for biting mateNo I did not. What I said was...
" you know what a clock looks like! Imagine your central projector is displaying a sort of a clock face onto the dome.
12 is directly overhead, with 9 and 3 opposite each other at the base of the dome.
Draw a diagram to explain how someone in UK sees 9,10,11,12,1,2 and 3 while someone in Australia sees 3,4,5,6,7,8 and 9."
Then you went off into your fake misunderstanding routine hoping the whole thing would vanish into the increasing layers of density.
That doesn't work like you portray it.No I did not. What I said was...
" you know what a clock looks like! Imagine your central projector is displaying a sort of a clock face onto the dome.
12 is directly overhead, with 9 and 3 opposite each other at the base of the dome.
Draw a diagram to explain how someone in UK sees 9,10,11,12,1,2 and 3 while someone in Australia sees 3,4,5,6,7,8 and 9."
Then you went off into your fake misunderstanding routine hoping the whole thing would vanish into the increasing layers of density.
Logon or register to see this image
Haway mate man, you are taking the piss now mindThat doesn't work like you portray it.
Are you looking at this clock from a time lapse point of view of your stars as if you're looking forward?
If so, what's your point?
Haway mate man, you are taking the piss now mind
Aye, you're both right.Pack it in man.
Don’t humour him man. He’s laughing at you for biting mate
Aye, you're both right.
He has to there is no logical argument he can buildHaway mate man, you are taking the piss now mind
or he's thick as fuckHe has to there is no logical argument he can build
Erm, you tell me. I was thinking about all rocket fuel used in any form of space travel that you claim can not exist.What rocket fuel are you thinking of?
So, repeated question, how do you know you can't burn rocket fuel in space and if you have tried it in a low pressure environment, tell us what you used, how you got hold of it and how you did your experiment?Friday 9:58 AM - Nukehasslefan
I could go into all kinds of reasons as to why I believe it to be faked in terms of what they tell us and show us.
The simplest reason for any of it is, rockets cannot fly in the environment they say space is. That alone kills it off without all the rest of the dodgy suspicious stuff that stands out.
Friday 10:02 AM - DaveH
Have you tried burning rocket fuel in the environment of space, or is this just a wild guess because it doesn't sound to you like it would work?
Friday 10:36 AM - Nukehasslefan
Just trying it in extreme low pressure is enough.
Friday 12:03pm
DaveH:
What? You have burned rocket fuel in extreme low pressures? Can you say where you got hold of the rocket fuel, where you got it from? How did you create the extreme low pressures?
Do you still have the equipment to do a short video? That would be amazing to see and repeat.
Saturday 08:2 AM - Nukehasslefan
What rocket fuel are you thinking of?
Maybe take some time to think about what I've said.
Or show the experiments you did to prove water can't .... Ah right sorryMaybe take some time to make a sketch like you did of the...oh...
Just bumping this to show how closed his mind is and how he will make any shit up to defend his positionI can promise you one thing. I will never believe a spinning globe again unless someone offers me proof and that cannot be done because it's plain and clear it is not a spinning globe.