Put a flat earthier into space

[Nukehasslefan]

You're just talking in generalities and swerving the question. Be specific to what I've said

I can't be any more specific than to say everything is under friction.
This covers everything at any level.

Naturally it doesn't cover anything you think if not friction and I can't help you in that regard. That's down to you.

Talk to me though how methane combusts in relation friction.

You've just answered your own question with combustion.
All everything is, is rubbing together of matter by dense breakdown of it by expansion.

Frequency is the number of occurrences of a repeating event per unit of time. How can an incorporeal number be friction?

The number isn't. It's simply frequency in all forms from lowest to highest, some of which we sense and some we don't, which animals and insects ...etc.....do.

It's all around us at all times.

 

[Kevj]

I can't be any more specific than to say everything is under friction.
This covers everything at any level.

Naturally it doesn't cover anything you think if not friction and I can't help you in that regard. That's down to you.

You've just answered your own question with combustion.
All everything is, is rubbing together of matter by dense breakdown of it by expansion.

The number isn't. It's simply frequency in all forms from lowest to highest, some of which we sense and some we don't, which animals and insects ...etc.....do.

It's all around us at all times.

Congratulations. You have also dismissed chemistry as a known and proven science.

I asked for elaboration, not the same vague description.

 

[Nobby]

Once again you have used lots of words to say nothing.
You said frequency of vibration is friction, frequency is a measure of how often something happens it isn't a force.

If you are going to use scientific words, use them correctly to give us a chance.

The same applies to English. I have no idea what this is even trying to say

"All everything is, is rubbing together of matter by dense breakdown of it by expansion."

 

[nahwee]

The man doesn’t properly understand what friction is or what vibration is.

 

[payne]

I can't be any more specific than to say everything is under friction.
This covers everything at any level.

Naturally it doesn't cover anything you think if not friction and I can't help you in that regard. That's down to you.

You've just answered your own question with combustion.
All everything is, is rubbing together of matter by dense breakdown of it by expansion.

The number isn't. It's simply frequency in all forms from lowest to highest, some of which we sense and some we don't, which animals and insects ...etc.....do.

It's all around us at all times.

simple as that. Nobel Prize incoming!

Once again you have used lots of words to say nothing.
You said frequency of vibration is friction, frequency is a measure of how often something happens it isn't a force.

If you are going to use scientific words, use them correctly to give us a chance.

The same applies to English. I have no idea what this is even trying to say

"All everything is, is rubbing together of matter by dense breakdown of it by expansion."

It's typical conspiracy style. Take all the words from the scientific fields, the science they dismiss, then apply them to sentences in random ways.

He speaks in tongues like some type of Shaman from days gone.

 

[What A Waster]

I can't be any more specific than to say everything is under friction.
This covers everything at any level.

Naturally it doesn't cover anything you think if not friction and I can't help you in that regard. That's down to you.

You've just answered your own question with combustion.
All everything is, is rubbing together of matter by dense breakdown of it by expansion.

The number isn't. It's simply frequency in all forms from lowest to highest, some of which we sense and some we don't, which animals and insects ...etc.....do.

It's all around us at all times.

You don't seem to understand friction.

 

[payne]

You don't seem to understand friction.

He doesn't seem to understand anything but think's he knows it all.

 

[What A Waster]

He doesn't seem to understand anything but think's he knows it all.

He could easily put up a few links to various sources where this information he has comes from. The stuff that flies in the face of conventional science

 

[zinedine]

Even they were saying it's a load of rubbish and asking for evidence. Same patter, carbon arcs, central crystal vortex, lemon squeezer etc.


Just done a search.

Post #2408 and #24012 is what you want

"Basically everything on Earth is trying to squash each other. It’s a fight all the way of push versus push or resistance
verses resistance or to put it bluntly. It’s a resistance of anything against an energy force pushing onto it."

I think he's been queuing at the checkouts in Aldi.

 

[legend7]

The man doesn’t properly understand what friction is or what vibration is.

Or English.
Or Frequency.

He could easily put up a few links to various sources where this information he has comes from. The stuff that flies in the face of conventional science

Tbh I don't think there are any links in existence that could show what he is waffling about, even the flat earthers don't come up with this level of made up gobbledegook.
I don't even know what he's trying to say anymore.
Water on a gradual slope I knew what he was saying even though he was completely wrong and contradicting himself but this new stuff is just random scientific words and sentences.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Congratulations. You have also dismissed chemistry as a known and proven science.

I asked for elaboration, not the same vague description.

There's no dismissal of chemistry.
You simply do not believe everything is due to vibration and I've simply told you everything is dependent on vibration.
Vibration is friction.
Nothing works without it.
Nothing survives without it.

All chemistry works because of it.

So basically I'm not dismissing chemistry.
I believe you are if you believe things can work without vibration/friction and frequency.

 

[What A Waster]

Or English.
Or Frequency.

Tbh I don't think there are any links in existence that could show what he is waffling about, even the flat earthers don't come up with this level of made up gobbledegook.
I don't even know what he's trying to say anymore.
Water on a gradual slope I knew what he was saying even though he was completely wrong and contradicting himself but this new stuff is just random scientific words and sentences.

Let me explain it clearly, we've been over this already.
Its an electrostatic fusion caused by resistance pressure modules. Coagulation is thermodynamics. Thermodynamics is coagulation.
You can't have biomass without photosythesised stratification.
If you can't understand it then I can't help you.

 

[legend7]

Let me explain it clearly, we've been over this already.
Its an electrostatic fusion caused by resistance pressure modules. Coagulation is thermodynamics. Thermodynamics is coagulation.
You can't have biomass without photosythesised stratification.
If you can't understand it then I can't help you.

Ahhhhhh right, gotcha now.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Once again you have used lots of words to say nothing.
You said frequency of vibration is friction, frequency is a measure of how often something happens it isn't a force.

A wave will not work without a force through a medium. You cannot have a wave without vibration/friction and frequency of it.

If you are going to use scientific words, use them correctly to give us a chance.

That depends on what is scientific.

The same applies to English. I have no idea what this is even trying to say

"All everything is, is rubbing together of matter by dense breakdown of it by expansion."

I'll make it longer so it's easier.
Ok. All everything is....meaning, all matter....which means everything about Earth....within and external to it, whatever that may be, is all down to vibration.

This means that all matter is under vibration and vibration is friction.
And all matter is also down down to the frequency of the vibration/friction.

It also means that no matter what the pressure by energy applied, you get vibration and frequency.
If that's not enough to get it from my point of view then I can't help you.

 

[taipeisafc]

There's no dismissal of chemistry.
You simply do not believe everything is due to vibration and I've simply told you everything is dependent on vibration.
Vibration is friction.
Nothing works without it.
Nothing survives without it.

All chemistry works because of it.

So basically I'm not dismissing chemistry.
I believe you are if you believe things can work without vibration/friction and frequency.

Vibration isn't friction though - they are separate phenomenon you can have vibration without friction and vice versa. You also went on about superfluids earlier in the thread, a defining characteristic of a superfluid is that they have essentially zero viscosity hence...guess what......they have no drag or frictional effects and an object set in motion in an infinitely long bath of superfluid will, in theory, travel along that line forever. There is a theory that all matter is made up of unbelievably small vibrating strings (string thoery) which are Planck length (1.616255×10−35 m) and form the basis for all matter but this is nothing more than a theory.

Velocity is a direction under travel.

Constant velocity means a constant speed in a direction which can never happen.
You can have a consistent speed or velocity in a direction but never a constant. Obviously in my opinion.

So an object cannot move in a direction at a constant velocity - hence it must be always either accelerating (not possible as it will approach an infinite speed) or decelerating (in which case everything will come to halt) even if they have a constant external force acting upon them. I am not sure you appreciated the difference between consistent and constant - I will use the "constant velocity is impossible" defence if I am ever up in court for speeding

 

[DaveH]

Going to bed last night, I turned out the lights and noticed my son had left out a few bits of glow in the dark geomag. Clearly loads of friction going on there as it let out light. Naturally it felt warm to the touch because friction=heat=sound=light. Putting my ear close I could hear it chirping away like loads of little crickets magnetically stuck together,

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Vibration isn't friction though - they are separate phenomenon you can have vibration without friction and vice versa.

No you can't.

You also went on about superfluids earlier in the thread, a defining characteristic of a superfluid is that they have essentially zero viscosity hence...guess what......they have no drag or frictional effects and an object set in motion in an infinitely long bath of superfluid will, in theory, travel along that line forever.

In theory something in space will simply go on forever. In theory. In reality it's impossible.
A superfluid is still under vibration/friction.

There is a theory that all matter is made up of unbelievably small vibrating strings (string thoery) which are Planck length (1.616255×10−35 m) and form the basis for all matter but this is nothing more than a theory.

I'm not interested in string theory but essentially all matter is made up of vibrations which is friction.
You cannot vibrate without having friction.

So an object cannot move in a direction at a constant velocity - hence it must be always either accelerating (not possible as it will approach an infinite speed) or decelerating (in which case everything will come to halt) even if they have a constant external force acting upon them.

Decelerating isn't really anything but we'll go with it.

Essentially, yes.
It's either accelerating or slowing but never constant. To be constant in this scenario would mean you have to have zero friction/resistance to a set motion to stay exactly in that motion.
It cannot be done, except in space fantasy.

I am not sure you appreciated the difference between consistent and constant - I will use the "constant velocity is impossible" defence if I am ever up in court for speeding

Consistent means you can keep something appearing to be ongoing at a sort of set level.
Constant would be no change, which is impossible.

 

[taipeisafc]

No you can't.


In theory something in space will simply go on forever. In theory. In reality it's impossible.
A superfluid is still under vibration/friction.



I'm not interested in string theory but essentially all matter is made up of vibrations which is friction.
You cannot vibrate without having friction.

Decelerating isn't really anything but we'll go with it.

Essentially, yes.
It's either accelerating or slowing but never constant. To be constant in this scenario would mean you have to have zero friction/resistance to a set motion to stay exactly in that motion.
It cannot be done, except in space fantasy.

Consistent means you can keep something appearing to be ongoing at a sort of set level.
Constant would be no change, which is impossible.

Superfluid have zero viscosity - hence no friction. You are contradicting yourself.

Decelerating really isn't anything - seriously.......you do know it means the same as slowing down

 

[What A Waster]

@Nukehasslefan how do you know that all matter is made up of vibrations?

 

[payne]

He could easily put up a few links to various sources where this information he has comes from. The stuff that flies in the face of conventional science

Do your own research