• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Put a flat earthier into space

fyl2u said:
You say you're not offering facts (which is true, you're just offering utter gobbledegook), but there are things you do keep repeating as if they were facts:

"The Earth is not a globe"
"There's no proof it's a globe"
"Nobody has shown you any proof"
"My experiments prove that it's not a globe"
"We're all just parroting a narrative"
"None of us who disagree with you are thinking for ourselves"
"Water doesn't conform to a curve"
"The Earth's tilt throughout its orbit is nonsense, it should act like a swingball ball"

...and many other examples.

You've done it throughout the thread, but none of these things are facts, they're just evidence that you haven't a clue what you're talking about.
Click to expand...
Cheers. Claims he is not insulting but constantly uses phrases like you don’t really understand, all of what you have learned is just regurgitating facts, you are closed minded and only see what you have been schooled into seeing, etc etc. All phrases that say you don’t actually have any knowledge and can’t work out things for yourself. While making up random shit that hasn’t been worked out just plucked out of thin air.
 

DaveH said:
Cheers. Claims he is not insulting but constantly uses phrases like you don’t really understand, all of what you have learned is just regurgitating facts, you are closed minded and only see what you have been schooled into seeing, etc etc. All phrases that say you don’t actually have any knowledge and can’t work out things for yourself. While making up random shit that hasn’t been worked out just plucked out of thin air.
Click to expand...

Put a flat earthier into space

You must be logged on to see this Lead is serviced from Uranium. We know this because we can measure with reasonable accuracy the level of radioactive decay. This is a proven science. The people who calculated this are scientists and not in any way ‘so called’. There’s many peer reviewed...
www.readytogo.net www.readytogo.net

6th September.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
We are all schooled and follow many narratives. Including myself.
You're trying to make out I'm calling people stupid, etc. I'm not. I'm trying to be respectful but people like you try to twist it as if it's not you that's actually being disrespectful.
The issue is, you think you have the right because you're backed by like minded people who think calling me an idiot and unstable and needing treatment and so on and so on, is all fine, but seem to be taken aback when you think your own intelligence appears to be in question by your own deduction.
That's your problem, not mine.

By all means carry on having a pop at me in all ways you generally try but don't start crying all the time when you can't find a way to shut me down on my thoughts.

You're playing to an audience, that's why you keep mentioning me as if you're talking about me instead of, to me.

The globe is a lot of made up garbage so by all means call out alternate thoughts to it. Just remember that you have zero proof of it being the spinning globe you fully believe it to be.

The globe absolutely begs questions. Begs them.... and yet you seem all fine with the explanations for it because it fits what you believe you see or read or video view...etc.
That's all well and good and obviously it's the set narrative that many follow.
People will argue till they're blue in the face that we supposedly live on a spinning ball, even if they just see it in a picture book, as long as that picture book puts it out as a fact. And so on.

The reality for them if they're honest would be, they simply don't know and likely haven't really taken much time to even bother thinking about anything of the sort, which I totally get.
Why would most people?

People see films and are saturated with a colourful spinning ball cartoon in so many films and shows and documentaries. It's in the psyche.

Most people are too busy getting on with their lives and worrying about all kinds of stuff they have to do.... and are doing.... and will do.... to give a spinning global Earth much thought.

But if anyone dares to step outside of that global comfort zone, the normal couldn't give a flying eff person will immediately jump up and defend it by nothing more than simply calling out the questioner as being a fruitcake or words to that effect.

It literally is the nature of the beast.

The atmosphere is being heated up by friction as you magnify the sun reflection onto the paper or wood or whatever. It creates more dense agitation to a point. This is caused by massively expanding the atmosphere at that point.

You're not getting anything unless you have friction.

And that's fine. I find the spinning globe and gravity and warped space time continuum....etc....etc....etc....utter fantastical nonsense so I wouldn't expect people to go from believing all that to believing what I'm saying.
I'm simply answering people's questions. I'm not asking anyone to believe anything I say, which is why I'm not offering facts.

Yep, down the rabbit hole. If you look deeper yourself you'll see that my responses can'ty me much else considering what I'm up against.


No it doesn't. Only in your mind.

Believe nothing and question everything.
When proof is not forthcoming, anything can be disbelieved until proof comes about.

Disbelief does not mean acceptance is nullified.

That's the key.
Click to expand...
Of course you contradict yourself.
The earth is not curved like a globe, my experiments prove it
The earth is curved like an orange squeezer
My earth is just a gradual curve so my previous argument holds
Here is a way of calculating the curve on the supposed globe which shows it is also a gradual curve but my curve holds and reality doesn’t because wibble.

Light needs a medium to travel through (based on nowt)
But light doesnt travel, it is instantaneous
But light and sound are the same thing
But sound does travel slower
So they travel travel at different speeds but arrive at the same time
Then your senses break them apart again because your brain knows distance
And so does a camera

It is a complete confused mess of ramblings. The problem with this thread going on so long is your are effectively arguing against yourself.
 
DaveH said:
Of course you contradict yourself.
The earth is not curved like a globe, my experiments prove it
The earth is curved like an orange squeezer
My earth is just a gradual curve so my previous argument holds
Here is a way of calculating the curve on the supposed globe which shows it is also a gradual curve but my curve holds and reality doesn’t because wibble.

Light needs a medium to travel through (based on nowt)
But light doesnt travel, it is instantaneous
But light and sound are the same thing
But sound does travel slower
So they travel travel at different speeds but arrive at the same time
Then your senses break them apart again because your brain knows distance
And so does a camera

It is a complete confused mess of ramblings. The problem with this thread going on so long is your are effectively arguing against yourself.
Click to expand...
he's the only person smart enough tbf
 
Nukehasslefan said:
Friction is simple. It's the clashing of matter by applied pressures and frequency. Basically it's vibration.
All of it is cause and effect of what we see, hear and feel....etc.

All matter is attached. No free space. No stray particles in any free space.
By free space I'm talking about the so called near vacuum of space we get told about which supposedly has free space with scatettered particles. It's nonsense.

Life and Earth has to operate under attached matter which is always under vibration and frequency. It's just a case of the pressure of it, in terms of denseness which we and our senses can detect some of it and see it in variations of that vibration, frequency from the energy applied.
Click to expand...
That's not just scientifically illiterate it's just illiterate.

If you are going to make up a new set of natural laws maybe you better make up new words for the various phenomena. Misusing established and understood terms such as friction, frequency, matter etc makes your argument impossible to understand as people try to apply the correct meaning to those terms
 
Nobby said:
That's not just scientifically illiterate it's just illiterate.

If you are going to make up a new set of natural laws maybe you better make up new words for the various phenomena. Misusing established and understood terms such as friction, frequency, matter etc makes your argument impossible to understand as people try to apply the correct meaning to those terms
Click to expand...
You may have hit the nail on the head there. I was asking about the speed of sound and light which could not be given, but he did mention the time to travel a distance. Definitely need a word to describe that.
 
DaveH said:
You may have hit the nail on the head there. I was asking about the speed of sound and light which could not be given, but he did mention the time to travel a distance. Definitely need a word to describe that.
Click to expand...

Timedist like denpressure. Of course with our fake science we will use speed (or velocity in most cases)
 
What A Waster said:
I don't think you understand what friction is.
This is from the BBC Bitesize Key Stage 2 page.
Should explain it clearly.

Friction​

Friction is a force between two surfaces that are sliding, or trying to slide, across each other. For example, when you try to push a book along the floor, friction makes this difficult.

Friction always works in the direction opposite to the direction in which the object is moving, or trying to move. Friction always slows a moving object down.
Click to expand...
Absolutely.
To push any object it requires friction. It requires vibration and frequency of energy applied.
So you know what friction is.
Everything you mention will have friction in order to move.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
Absolutely.
To push any object it requires friction. It requires vibration and frequency of energy applied.
So you know what friction is.
Everything you mention will have friction in order to move.
Click to expand...

Apart from burning paper with a magnifying glass doesn't involve friction to create light and heat.
 
taipeisafc said:
Timedist like denpressure. Of course with our fake science we will use speed (or velocity in most cases)
Click to expand...
As long as constant velocity isn't used because that cannot exist.
What A Waster said:
Apart from burning paper with a magnifying glass doesn't involve friction to create light and heat.
Click to expand...
You don't get light without heat. You don't get heat without friction.
It doesn't matter how severe the friction is or how miniscule the friction is, it is all friction and can never be anything other than friction.
 
Last edited:
Nukehasslefan said:
As long as constant velocity isn't used because that cannot exist.

You don't get light without heat. You don't get heat without friction.
It doesn't matter how severe the friction is or how miniscule the friction is, it is all friction and can never be anything other than friction.
Click to expand...

So what is velocity then and why cant it be constant?
 
Nukehasslefan said:
As long as constant velocity isn't used because that cannot exist.

You don't get light without heat. You don't get heat without friction.
It doesn't matter how severe the friction is or how miniscule the friction is, it is all friction and can never be anything other than friction.
Click to expand...

There's no friction involved when concentrating the sun through the lens of the magnifying glass onto a piece of paper, which then generates light and heat (fire)
 
taipeisafc said:
So what is velocity then and why cant it be constant?
Click to expand...
Velocity is a direction under travel.

Constant velocity means a constant speed in a direction which can never happen.
You can have a consistent speed or velocity in a direction but never a constant. Obviously in my opinion.
 
What A Waster said:
There's no friction involved when concentrating the sun through the lens of the magnifying glass onto a piece of paper, which then generates light and heat (fire)
Click to expand...
There's friction from source to receiver.
Sun to magnifying glass, on to paper and all inbetween.
There's never an instance when friction is not a thing.
Nothing could live if friction stopped, even for a nano second (for example).
 
Nukehasslefan said:
There's friction from source to receiver.
Sun to magnifying glass, on to paper and all inbetween.
There's never an instance when friction is not a thing.
Nothing could live if friction stopped, even for a nano second (for example).
Click to expand...

What? From source to receiver? Where is the friction from the sun to the magnifying glass? What two surfaces are acting against each other? I mean the magnifying glass isn't even moving in order to counter any resistance
 
What A Waster said:
What? From source to receiver? Where is the friction from the sun to the magnifying glass? What two surfaces are acting against each other?
Click to expand...
Ok, think about this.
The atmosphere the suns waves are coming through, is agitated. The agitation of it is in pressure stages or layers of extreme broken down matter, or more expanded, to more dense to the foundation.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top