• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Put a flat earthier into space

Then leave it at that and carry on with something else that doesn't involve me.

That's heat with friction.
No I'm curious to do the experiments that prove light and sound are the same.

There is no friction in those examples I gave, just saying something doesn't make it true.
 

No I'm curious to do the experiments that prove light and sound are the same.

There is no friction in those examples I gave, just saying something doesn't make it true.
If you think there's no friction involved in the examples you gave then stick with that.
I'm not here to convince you of anything.
It's up to you to think outside of the box or not.
 
If you think there's no friction involved in the examples you gave then stick with that.
I'm not here to convince you of anything.
It's up to you to think outside of the box or not.
Where is the friction in those examples, you know specific examples of two surfaces in contact causing friction, not "friction of matter" without any explanation of what that means in those examples
 
Put potassium in water, no friction involved but it burns up. This is 11yr old chemistry stuff. Light and heat generated due to the reaction. No friction involved.
 
I never said I did any experiments to show sound is light. I said anyone can do them to show it's a reality.
The thing is, people refuse to look at stuff in simple terms and prefer to go right down the complicated so called scientific route of uncertainty pass off as proof, not because they want to avoid simplicity it's more likely wanting to avoid peer pressure.

They still pluck arguments out with wave/particle duality.
Basically they struggle to understand if light is a wave or a particle.

Or do they?

I stand by what I've said.You cannot get light without friction and you cannot get sound without it, either.
Friction and frequency is your energy and the power/pressure of that energy determines what you hear and what you see, in terms of us humans.
Insects and animals differ but the premise is exactly the same from source.



Do you know what an experiment is?
Sorry, I was sure you had said you had done experiments to prove that light and sound are the same thing. I can’t be arsed to read back, so I may have been incorect.

So you have not done any experiments to prove this “ground breaking science”, but we are all foolish sheep following what we are told, all documented science on the subject is wrong, governments are in on a conspiracy to cover up the real truth that you alone know, and you don’t even have anything to base this on?

That is what I said about conspiracy theorists. Rubbish pulled out of thin air then conspiracy because the rest of the world does not agree.
 
Where is the friction in those examples, you know specific examples of two surfaces in contact causing friction, not "friction of matter" without any explanation of what that means in those examples
Friction is friction whether it's a gas, liquid or solid.
Put potassium in water, no friction involved but it burns up. This is 11yr old chemistry stuff. Light and heat generated due to the reaction. No friction involved.
Anything that burns is doing it because of friction.
Anything that boils is doing it because of friction.
The air you breathe is under friction.
Your entire body is under friction.

Life and Earth does not work without friction.
It really is as simple as that.
Sorry, I was sure you had said you had done experiments to prove that light and sound are the same thing. I can’t be arsed to read back, so I may have been incorect.

So you have not done any experiments to prove this “ground breaking science”, but we are all foolish sheep following what we are told, all documented science on the subject is wrong, governments are in on a conspiracy to cover up the real truth that you alone know, and you don’t even have anything to base this on?

That is what I said about conspiracy theorists. Rubbish pulled out of thin air then conspiracy because the rest of the world does not agree.
Try not to get into a frenzy about this sheep stuff and foolish. It's nothing to do with me thinking anything of the sort. This is you making it up to suit and you're welcome to it if it helps you get along.
 
Last edited:
Friction is friction whether it's a gas, liquid or solid.

Anything that burns is doing it because of friction.
Anything that boils is doing it because of friction.
The air you breathe is under friction.
Your entire body is under friction.

Life and Earth does not work without friction.
It really is as simple as that.

Try not to get into a frenzy about this sheep stuff and foolish. It's nothing to do with me thinking anything of the sort. This is you making it up to suit and you're welcome to it if it helps you get along.
You have been bleating on for months how we are all following what we are schooled without questioning and claiming without understanding.

It is something I have noticed conspiracy theorists say a lot while priding them selves on being alternative thinkers, or free thinkers is the other term. The reality is making up shit with no basis to replace a reality they fail to understand.
 
What is friction, I'm not sure you are using the word it in the same way as the rest of us

Science-friction
.

Anything that burns is doing it because of friction.
Anything that boils is doing it because of friction.
The air you breathe is under friction.
Your entire body is under friction.

Sunlight through a magnifying glass onto a piece of paper. Where's the friction?
 
Last edited:
I never said I did any experiments to show sound is light. I said anyone can do them to show it's a reality.
The thing is, people refuse to look at stuff in simple terms and prefer to go right down the complicated so called scientific route of uncertainty pass off as proof, not because they want to avoid simplicity it's more likely wanting to avoid peer pressure.

They still pluck arguments out with wave/particle duality.
Basically they struggle to understand if light is a wave or a particle.

Or do they?

I stand by what I've said.You cannot get light without friction and you cannot get sound without it, either.
Friction and frequency is your energy and the power/pressure of that energy determines what you hear and what you see, in terms of us humans.
Insects and animals differ but the premise is exactly the same from source.



Do you know what an experiment is?

tbf though, your explanations for things are more fantastical than the scientific route.
 
Back
Top