Nukehasslefan
Winger
Let's just say I accept sound can have a speed back to our ears or back to a source, or to a receiver.
Natural.
Put a flat earthier into space
- Thread starter southstander
- Start date
What is that speed?
DaveH
Striker
So is that speed instantaneous?
And you never did say what your experiment was to prove that light=sound. Can you tell us?
D
Deleted member 6694
Guest
Logon or register to see this image
Somebody linked posts from other forums with him on there going back about 5 years. Genuine mate
BigPete
Striker
Just been trolling that long IMO
This was on a flatty forum
BigPete
Striker
I think there were two flatty forums linked and even the people on there found him full of shit.
BigPete
Striker
Would have thought he'd be respected on those forums
Even they were saying it's a load of rubbish and asking for evidence. Same patter, carbon arcs, central crystal vortex, lemon squeezer etc.
Just done a search.
Post #2408 and #24012 is what you want
Last edited:
BigPete
Striker
Quote them pls cba to search haha
"The sun is an invisible electromagnetic battery revolving in the universe's center on a 24-year cycle. Our visible sun is only a reflection, as is the moon, with the stars reflecting off seven mercurial discs"
Looks like our free thinker has been plagiarising Cyrus Teed and just following "the storey tellers"
en.wikipedia.org
Teed's "greatest" work is "Cellular Cosmology" sound familiar to anyone?
Looks like our free thinker has been plagiarising Cyrus Teed and just following "the storey tellers"
Cyrus Teed - Wikipedia
"The sun is an invisible electromagnetic battery revolving in the universe's center on a 24-year cycle. Our visible sun is only a reflection, as is the moon, with the stars reflecting off seven mercurial discs"
Looks like our free thinker has been plagiarising Cyrus Teed and just following "the storey tellers"
Cyrus Teed - Wikipedia
Teed's "greatest" work is "Cellular Cosmology" sound familiar to anyone?
Last edited:
Nukehasslefan
Winger
it depends on the energy/pressure.
I bet you're thinking of a jet breaking the sound barrier or something, right?
No, not to our receivers, whether that be our ears or whatever.
You see sound has to always clash matter like a wave on water.
Depending on the energy applied will depend on when the wave reaches a point before it is absorbed.
It's pretty obvious if you take the time out to see it for yourself and understand the simplicity of it.
We're all a bit mad. Some madder than others. But, you know the saying. Insanity can sometimes be indistinguishable from genius or at least have such a fine line depending on who view it.
What we need to find out is, are we all mad geniuses in our own way?
It doesn't sound familiar to me. None of it is what I'm saying."The sun is an invisible electromagnetic battery revolving in the universe's center on a 24-year cycle. Our visible sun is only a reflection, as is the moon, with the stars reflecting off seven mercurial discs"
Looks like our free thinker has been plagiarising Cyrus Teed and just following "the storey tellers"
Cyrus Teed - Wikipedia
Teed's "greatest" work is "Cellular Cosmology" sound familiar to anyone?
Last edited:
payne
Striker
he sees himself as a genius......wow
DaveH
Striker
So light and sound are the same. Light needs a medium to travel through but doesn’t actually travel because it is just instantaneous, but sound does travel and far far slower than light. This means they are the same because of an experiment which you claim to have done but refuse to share details of, which does sound like lies.
If you recall, the other day I said:
Actual science: Thousands of years of full disclosure. Experiments performed with full details of how and the results peer reviewed and published, put into the open for others to accept, repeat, challenge, modify and then those modified experiments published in the same way. The result is a gradual increase in more and more knowledge, improving on accuracy all the time. Sometimes this can be a complete u-turn if something really unexpected is discovered.
Conspiracy theorists: Reject known science because they don’t understand it, does not meet their personal expectations, or just can’t be arsed to research. Pull random idea out their arse which makes little sense and often a collection of these ideas contradict each other disproving their own ideas. Claim anyone who challenges them is a sheep following what they have been brainwashed into thinking, make out they are a free thinker and somehow better, then when actual science does not agree either, claim a massive conspiracy cover up spanning every country on earth over hundreds of years, with no explanation of why anyone would cover that up or how to keep such a secret for so long in what ends up being a very complex conspiracy involving hundreds of thousands of those in the know.
It is pretty clear which group you belong to.
Predicted answer to this: I’m a sheep, you don’t have to give details of your experiments and it is pretty simple when you think about it (if you sniff paint thinners first)
Hero syndrome
Nukehasslefan
Winger
Light is the product of sound. Sound is the product of vibration/friction and frequency.
One can't work without the other.
In terms of us mere human beings it's all about what we detect not wholly what is happening at the lowest end or the highest end of the scale.
We're just not that perceptible.
Let me try and make this easy.
If someone shines a torch from distance to a point where you can see that light, you see it because it's instant. It's instant because it's reflecting through the atmosphere to your eye.
The nonsense that light takes time to reach you and can reach you from the past, in terms of so called stars, is hogwash and people must be suspicious of that nonsense, I would think.
Anyway, sound takes time to hit our ear drums because it's a pressure. A vibration/friction and a frequency.
This is why we see the light before we register the sound that creates it.
You can look on them as the source. The same if you wish but how we perceive them is by putting them into categories based on our own senses.
Ok then show me the 1000's of years of disclosure that you can verify.
Anyone can do that, not just so called conspiracy theorists.
Then it comes down to asking for clarity and when clarity cannot be shown due to all kinds of excuses, it gets suspiciously questioned and this is when a person becomes a CT to those who dislike the questioning.
Such as?
We're all sheep like, including myself, so there's no dig. ANyone who cares to look around them will understand we follow narratives in many/most cases.
Nahh. Thinking outside of the box but not thinking I'm (personally) better than others. I'd place that back at others who come out with this, to be fair.
It depends on what's been told and sold.
You can pout me in any group you wish. It doesn't matter to me how you see me.
If you want to use those words on a regular basis then copy then and find a place to reference, then just paste it as many times as you feel the need to.
