Put a flat earthier into space

[Gelan]

he's the Hawing of our era. A free thinker.....a special human
proper brazen actually telling us they're actors.

You must be logged on to see external links

The problem with conspiracy theories is that thousands of people could not keep a secret. If two people know a secret, it is no longer a secret. It took 40,000 people to put together the first moon shot. All those people never got drunk, depressed, mouthed off etc, plus had to act as if the moon landing was exciting

 

[Bobthebasted]

Even the greatest Saint of all time thought the world was a sphere globe.

I am not a religious person but don't dis the BEDE


Bede was lucid about earth's sphericity, writing "We call the earth a globe, not as if the shape of a sphere were expressed in the diversity of plains and mountains, but because, if all things are included in the outline, the earth's circumference will represent the figure of a perfect globe..

Ok he did also say the earth was middle of the universe but to be fair to Bede, Vesto slipher only worked it out at the start of the 20th century that universe was moving.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Yes they all know what it means.

GRAVITY.

Magical gravity. A magical force that isn't a force, then is, then isn't, when it suits. And yet cannot be explained as to what it is.

no further discussion required

Agreed. It shows clearly the argument used for the globe is now stacked against it by stuff like this.
Desperate attempts by news to hide he bull.

That is avoiding the question isn’t it. Which is hardly a surprise, you back away quickly as soon as the details look like they are going to show what you are saying as being a load of rubbish.

You say that level water in a bath shows the earth is not a globe, but works on your also curved earth because your curve is slight. Why will you not calculate what the curve of a bath is to see if the curve on the globe is slight too?

We all know the answer and I calculated it earlier. The curve over the length of a bath is a tiny fraction of a millimetre and your own calculations will show that.

It is what I said, contradictions and your own arguments against a globe work against your lemon squeezer earth.

I have no need to calculate any bath. By all means keep using a bath and skipping over the other stuff but it doesn't help your argument.

 

[Roman maroni]

Magical gravity. A magical force that isn't a force, then is, then isn't, when it suits. And yet cannot be explained as to what it is.

Agreed. It shows clearly the argument used for the globe is now stacked against it by stuff like this.
Desperate attempts by news to hide he bull.

I have no need to calculate any bath. By all means keep using a bath and skipping over the other stuff but it doesn't help your argument.

Simpleton

 

[DaveH]

Magical gravity. A magical force that isn't a force, then is, then isn't, when it suits. And yet cannot be explained as to what it is.

Agreed. It shows clearly the argument used for the globe is now stacked against it by stuff like this.
Desperate attempts by news to hide he bull.

I have no need to calculate any bath. By all means keep using a bath and skipping over the other stuff but it doesn't help your argument.

What I’m pointing out is the confused hypocrisy of all your arguments. I’m concentrating on thr bath because that has been your one main source of proof the earth is not a globe through this long thread. Then after a few months you turn round and put forward an earth that is also curved. But that is ok it apparently works with you and your bath because the curve is minor.

We both know the curve over the length of a bath is minor on a globe, so your whole argument is bollocks. And you will not work it out because you know the answer.

The curve of the earth over a distance of a 1m bath is 0.000176mm. Do you agree?

Do you agree this is minor and undetectable to the human eye?

 

[payne]

The problem with conspiracy theories is that thousands of people could not keep a secret. If two people know a secret, it is no longer a secret. It took 40,000 people to put together the first moon shot. All those people never got drunk, depressed, mouthed off etc, plus had to act as if the moon landing was exciting

Hollywood has thousands of actors mate. They're even sending them up on Amazon's fake rocket right in our faces just to take the piss

 

[Nukehasslefan]

What I’m pointing out is the confused hypocrisy of all your arguments.

There's no hypocrisy.

I’m concentrating on thr bath because that has been your one main source of proof the earth is not a globe through this long thread.

No.
You're concentrating on the nath because it's the easiest thing you think you can use to make it look like I base my argument against a globe directly on it.
Now don;t get me wrong here. You can use whatever you feel you think can batter me down but just remember it does not give any credence to your spinning globe. You carry on though, I'm fine with it.

Then after a few months you turn round and put forward an earth that is also curved.

No. You put forward an Earth like that because you refused to understand my take on it. I explained it all and have no need to keep repeating that just because you and others decide I have it wrong.
But don't mind me, you carry on if you think it suits your argument.

But that is ok it apparently works with you and your bath because the curve is minor.

The curve on your globe is far from minor if we go by the near 8 inches per mile squared set up which you first denied and now show up a graph of exactly that.
I even recall you liking posts of people who were saying it was only 8 inches per mile no matter how many miles.
That's until you found out differently, so I'm all good with it.

We both know the curve over the length of a bath is minor on a globe, so your whole argument is bollocks. And you will not work it out because you know the answer.

You keep to the bath but remember there is no water curve in a bath no matter how much you pretend it's so minor over your global spinning Earth.
People are just coaxed into taking leave of their own senses.
I understand it because I once was coaxed into exactly that.

The curve of the earth over a distance of a 1m bath is 0.000176mm. Do you agree?

Nope.

Do you agree this is minor and undetectable to the human eye?

Nope.


Why?
Because the water curve is fiction. The water if flat and level and will remain level even if you tipped the bath up a little.
It would remain level if you tipped up a bowl a little.
It would remain level and flat if you sloped a swimming pool from deep to shallow, which we all know is a reality.

We can put this into simple perspective.

There's not a way in hell you can sow any reality to your spinning globe. None.

 

[Nobby]

So you've gone back to water being flat and level, after saying it was just essentially flat over the weekend.

At least try and keep your argument consistent

 

[monkeytassle]

Magical gravity. A magical force that isn't a force, then is, then isn't, when it suits. And yet cannot be explained as to what it is.

Agreed. It shows clearly the argument used for the globe is now stacked against it by stuff like this.
Desperate attempts by news to hide he bull.

I have no need to calculate any bath. By all means keep using a bath and skipping over the other stuff but it doesn't help your argument.

Your disc theory. What force is it that makes the planet a disc?

 

[payne]

So you've gone back to water being flat and level, after saying it was just essentially flat over the weekend.

At least try and keep your argument consistent

He's just on another level intellect wise compared to mere mortals like you and I.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Your disc theory. What force is it that makes the planet a disc?

I don't have a disc theory.

 

[Nobby]

I don't have a disc theory.

Rewording his question what force gives your version of earth its shape and allows it to maintain that shape

 

[monkeytassle]

I don't have a disc theory.

Ok a disc with up and down bits

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Rewording his question what force gives your version of earth its shape and allows it to maintain that shape

A cell resistance force against other like cells, potentially.
A central energy that creates a stacked set up of all matter pertaining to the density of it under pressured layers from what we perceive as solids to liquids to gases.

Ok a disc with up and down bits

A cell.

 

[Nobby]

A cell resistance force against other like cells, potentially.
A central energy that creates a stacked set up of all matter pertaining to the density of it under pressured layers from what we perceive as solids to liquids to gases.

Want to try explaining that as you are talking about energy not force, two very different concepts

 

[nahwee]

So you've gone back to water being flat and level, after saying it was just essentially flat over the weekend.

At least try and keep your argument consistent

Nukehasslefan, as water being flat is central to your argument, I’ll ask again, for the 5th!, time: Do you have any information on third parties attempting to confirm this?

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Want to try explaining that as you are talking about energy not force, two very different concepts

You don't get force without applied energy.
It's all about resistance.

Nukehasslefan, as water being flat is central to your argument, I’ll ask again, for the 5th!, time: Do you have any information on third parties attempting to confirm this?

Anyone can confirm it.

 

[nahwee]

Anyone can confirm it.

That’s not an answer.

Do you have any information?

 

[Nobby]

You don't get force without applied energy.
It's all about resistance.

So you have mentioned some vague energy source how about some more detail about that, how that energy is converted into force and how those forces give you your planetary shape and maintain it

 

[Nukehasslefan]

That’s not an answer.

Do you have any information?

It is an answer and I know many people that's proven water to be level and flat.
You know it is and so does everyone else on here....etc.
The major issue is in going with the water curves mindset because you're basically told to do so.

You've basically been told to abandon your own logical senses in favour of utter gunk.
I was in exactly that same set up a few decades ago.

So you have mentioned some vague energy source how about some more detail about that, how that energy is converted into force and how those forces give you your planetary shape and maintain it

Density, vibration and frequency.