• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

NUFC/Sportwashing

Status
Not open for further replies.

mag in peace said:
Ok let's clarify, where did KLD's money come from?

Where has his mother just made a vast sum of money from a working partnership with.

I wasn't saying Sunderland had a working relationship with Abu Dhabi, I was using it as a point that not everyone that deals with these people are instantly massive bastards. Unless you are saying KLD's mum and by proxy he is.
Click to expand...

He inherited it from his father, who died in 2009.

Now, let's cut through some of the crap you're talking.

LDC sold an indirect 45% stake to ADQ, a state-owned Aby Dhabi holding company. MaLD had previously controlled 96% through Akra Trust and remains non-executive chairman of LDC. KLD's personal involvement in this - zero. KLD's influence in this decision - zero. KLD's employment status in LDC - zero. Ergo, the involvement of Sunderland Ltd in this - zero. Ownership of Sunderland Ltd by ADQ 0%

Possibly embarrassing to KlD.

Going on - "blood money". Abu Dhabi has a far from unblemished human rights records. It's restrictive and homophobic - par for the course in an Islamic state. However, it does not execute homosexuals, and, to the best of my knowledge, has never commissioned an extra-judicial murder. It loses marks for giving financial support to some Yemeni groups, but, unlike Saudi. does not bomb Yemeni civilians. Not nice people, but not in the same league as KSA. all of which is utterly irrelevant in the context of Sunderland.

You're creating yet another deflection tactic, and using deliberate obfuscation, to try to link Sunderland to a transaction entered into by a entirely different member of the Louis-Dreyfus family. It's not working.
 
Get Into Em said:
I'd hope not as I vote Labour.

If she was, I would have said 'I still can't get over Labour publically supporting it.', which they very publically don't.

I still don't understand the point your making.

Also, I do not know one Newcastle fan that doesn't support this. Could you could send me a link to any relevent figure, or fanbased/fanled media that are against the takeover?
Click to expand...
Same here tbh. They're absolutely loving it.
 
cluffy said:
There's no way the Mags won't be singing songs in praise of MBS. It's nailed on they'll humiliate themselves once they get in the ground
Click to expand...

As I said in an earlier post.

The TV pictures of them at Newcastle Airport welcoming him for his first home match attendence wearing bed sheets, tea towels and masks will potentially haunt them.

There's every chance he'll be flying in his own private jet - the one he transported his team of bodyguards / assassins in when they killed Khashoggi and dismembered his body in the KSA embassy in Turkey.
 
mag in peace said:
It's not a whip around however if it's a united action across fan bases. It makes a proper statement of intent. The money raised would then not be insignificant. It also removes it from just being action taken by Newcastle fans, when clearly there are a lot of people unhappy about their presence.
Click to expand...
‘The money raised would not be insignificant’ says the bloke who’s team have been taken over the Yemen’s attackers Saudi Arabia creating a situation where money is no obstacle.
mag in peace said:
Is she? Do you think she will ever even meet him?
Click to expand...
errrm YES…?? 🙈🙈🙈 And even if not, haven’t you heard of this new fangled thing called working from home?

They’ll still be working with each other in directly by virtue of the fact he chairs the PIF with an 80% stake.
 
Grumpy Old Man said:
He inherited it from his father, who died in 2009.

Now, let's cut through some of the crap you're talking.

LDC sold an indirect 45% stake to ADQ, a state-owned Aby Dhabi holding company. MaLD had previously controlled 96% through Akra Trust and remains non-executive chairman of LDC. KLD's personal involvement in this - zero. KLD's influence in this decision - zero. KLD's employment status in LDC - zero. Ergo, the involvement of Sunderland Ltd in this - zero. Ownership of Sunderland Ltd by ADQ 0%

Possibly embarrassing to KlD.

Going on - "blood money". Abu Dhabi has a far from unblemished human rights records. It's restrictive and homophobic - par for the course in an Islamic state. However, it does not execute homosexuals, and, to the best of my knowledge, has never commissioned an extra-judicial murder. It loses marks for giving financial support to some Yemeni groups, but, unlike Saudi. does not bomb Yemeni civilians. Not nice people, but not in the same league as KSA. all of which is utterly irrelevant in the context of Sunderland.

You're creating yet another deflection tactic, and using deliberate obfuscation, to try to link Sunderland to a transaction entered into by a entirely different member of the Louis-Dreyfus family. It's not working.
Click to expand...
You wasted your time writing that all out because that wasn't at all what I was trying to do. I've explained it multiple times.

Is someone instantly an evil person because of their connections, was what I was querying. If that's the case, surely KLDs mam is also proper evil. That was all I was saying.

I was not trying to link Sunderland to Abu Dhabi in anyway.
 
KLD seems like a good sort to me. I expect if he was to murder someone he'd stab them firmly but honestly through the heart.

Bombing school buses; lobbing gay lads off buildings; half burying women and then getting a dumper truck to tip rubble on top of them; tricking journalists to come to tea at the embassy and then getting 12 hired goons to mince them up; these are all examples of what I would call bad murders.

He's a right f***ing twat your owner.
 
Grumpy Old Man said:
He inherited it from his father, who died in 2009.

Now, let's cut through some of the crap you're talking.

LDC sold an indirect 45% stake to ADQ, a state-owned Aby Dhabi holding company. MaLD had previously controlled 96% through Akra Trust and remains non-executive chairman of LDC. KLD's personal involvement in this - zero. KLD's influence in this decision - zero. KLD's employment status in LDC - zero. Ergo, the involvement of Sunderland Ltd in this - zero. Ownership of Sunderland Ltd by ADQ 0%

Possibly embarrassing to KlD.

Going on - "blood money". Abu Dhabi has a far from unblemished human rights records. It's restrictive and homophobic - par for the course in an Islamic state. However, it does not execute homosexuals, and, to the best of my knowledge, has never commissioned an extra-judicial murder. It loses marks for giving financial support to some Yemeni groups, but, unlike Saudi. does not bomb Yemeni civilians. Not nice people, but not in the same league as KSA. all of which is utterly irrelevant in the context of Sunderland.

You're creating yet another deflection tactic, and using deliberate obfuscation, to try to link Sunderland to a transaction entered into by a entirely different member of the Louis-Dreyfus family. It's not working.
Click to expand...
That’s all well and good, but did he watch Bambi in his younger days?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top