Yes, the sun has gravity - a hell of a lot of it. Every mass has a gravitational field. From a grape up to the sun, only grapes are small and have a very small gravitational field, the sun is very large and has a large field.
As the story goes. You have no clue as to any reality of this, right?
You follow the story and you study a bit of what it told. That's all we can do. We are reliant on following (or in my case....not) those stories if we want to argue in their favour or simply pass an exam by regurgitating what was set out.
The earth doesn't wobble it's way around the orbit, which is why that idea makes no sense.
By the model put out by whoever rigged it up, it clearly does in this model scenario.
You don't get the north pole peg sitting away from the sun and then the north pole peg pointing at it if it's simply going around in a circle or near circle if anyone wants to add in an elliptical orbit carry on.
The earth's gravity will not be having a significant effect on the sun, due to it's distance. However the sun has has a massive effect on the earth. It is what holds it in orbit.
This big ball of fire/plasma/nuclear fusion or whatever stuff is bandied about for it, is supposed to be pushing its radiation out, so how is it supposedly dragging anything towards it?
Yeah, you say gravity but what is that force this supposed sun that apparently can fit 1.3 million Earth's inside of it and yet have so little effect.
What is this gravity as a force?
Here's something.
It would make a little bit more sense to have that sun push the Earth back as the Earth supposedly falls into this warped space... if there was such a thing in a nothingness
I mean, it's sold and told as a vacuum which just adds to the basic nonsense, as far as I'm concerned.
The real warped space is what we're living in. We all warp it and so does every object within this atmosphere.
Why?
Because that's called a real medium and we as bodies and objects displace it by our own dense makeup and fictional space vacuums offer nothing but magical stories and absolutely nothing to work from.
They're good stories but should be firmly on the fiction shelf.
Things like the moon and earth have settled in orbit around the sun because of a complete balance of forces. Like your swingball analogy, the earth and moon have momentum. Naturally they would fly off in a straight line. However they don't because gravity is pulling them back. This causes them to fly in a circle. They are constantly trying to fly off at a tangent to the circular orbit but the force they are trying to fly off with is exactly equal the the force pulling it in.
You do not get any balance of forces with unevenness and elliptical orbit stories scupper that.
If we could apply a brake to the moon and slow it down, then the gravitational effect of the earth would be greater than the force of the moon trying to fly off and this would cause it to move closer to the earth. The increased gravity of the moon would give higher tides, more adverse weather and earthquakes. Don't to this.
It offers me a clue, but the thing is understanding it - which you clearly don't.
We get told time and time again about Earth moving 5 million miles closer to the sun at certain times and the moon doing the same.
It offers nothing but nonsense.
The trouble is we've been coaxed into a belief system of millions, billions, trillions of stars and whatnot that are so far away they're much easier to be calculated in terms of light years.
We then get offered time travel with those same so called stars. Big balls of fire like our so called big sun, only they apparently dwarf it...and yet we get told we only see those stars as they were 1 million or 10 million, or whatever years ago. Basically we get told that some might be dead and we're just getting the light they emitted millions of years ago...and so on and so on. It beggars belief. It is nuts but is sold as a truth.
I know I know. It's because I just don't understand it.
To be honest, nobody does, anymore than they understand why superman has massive strength and can fly and whatever.... or how santa gets down the chimney and why Rudolph and the gang, plus the sleigh full of a trillion presents do not damage the roof tiles.
I know, that's just a fiction and we know that now....right?
We're still treated like the kids we once were and still sold the stories. Only this time it's on a larger scale of bull****.
In my opinion, of course.
So refresh my memory as I lose track of all of your genuis theories, how do you explain the poles again do you think there is one "ice rim" around a sort of circle not 2 poles at opposite ends of the planet?
I believe we live inside a cell.
The membrane above is clear ice made (potentially) of a hydrogen/helium...etc....mix. Maybe something even lower on the scale.
In the centre of this cell is the energy we see projected onto that ice dome, including all the rest of the lights moving about.
No poles as such but one big central energy vortex that is consistently being fed.
The farther away from it the less we feel of that vortex.
The closer would be of such strength (to us) we would perish.
I've explained a lot. You can look back if you're interested...and if not, no probs.
You asked so I've given you a little insight.
Just so you know...none of it factually provable and I don't pass it off as such. It's my own thoughts based on my own experiments and workings.
What do you need, a Youtube video of a small child demonstrating exactly what you refuse to understand verbally?
