• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

NUFC/Sportwashing

Status
Not open for further replies.

Rosco said:
He's put literally fuck all in.....but deluded people on this forum think Mikes pumped £M into the club and our saviour


And yes I know its Net spend but it still shows how little has been invested

You must be logged on to see external links

You must be logged on to see external links
Click to expand...
That's basically net spend.
The fact you've got a zero net spend means you've done remarkably well with your transfer business or would you rather have spunked £459m like Aston Villa?
 
Binxy said:
That's basically net spend.
The fact you've got a zero net spend means you've done remarkably well with your transfer business or would you rather have spunked £459m like Aston Villa?
Click to expand...
Swiss Ramble has a good thread on us, but in terms of investment into the infrastructure it's £11m over 13 years.
You must be logged on to see media items
 
The Fish said:
Swiss Ramble has a good thread on us, but in terms of investment into the infrastructure it's £11m over 13 years.
You must be logged on to see media items
Click to expand...
Dear f***ing god man are you still banging on about Ashley. You've made your point several times over with the same argument on this thread. We get it, you don't like him and think he's a terrible owner. You're becoming a repetitive embarrassing boring fucker now like.
 
Rosco said:
He's put literally fuck all in.....but deluded people on this forum think Mikes pumped £M into the club and our saviour
Click to expand...
The fact that the club owed Ashley around £140m just a year or so ago implies that he must have pumped money into the club and without this money, the club would be in a worse state than it is now so that would also make him your saviour.
 
Mr B said:
The fact that the club owed Ashley around £140m just a year or so ago implies that he must have pumped money into the club and without this money, the club would be in a worse state than it is now so that would also make him your saviour.
Click to expand...
Aye but net spend.
 
sofatester said:
Dear f***ing god man are you still banging on about Ashley. You've made your point several times over with the same argument on this thread. We get it, you don't like him and think he's a terrible owner. You're becoming a repetitive embarrassing boring fucker now like.
Click to expand...
That ship sailed years ago
 
Sons of The Wear said:
They didn't put that in, man. Are you living in a parallel universe or something?
Click to expand...
What? I know Halls and Shepherd didn't put £146m into the club, the other lad is saying Ashley did.
Mr B said:
The fact that the club owed Ashley around £140m just a year or so ago implies that he must have pumped money into the club and without this money, the club would be in a worse state than it is now so that would also make him your saviour.
Click to expand...
No it doesn't, it just means he bought the debt.
 
Binxy said:
£111m according to that Swiss ramble link.
Click to expand...
A loan that the club owes him (the debt I think he took on from the initial purchase), not an investment into the infrastructure. In 13 years, the club has spent £11m on infrastructure.
 
In business. If you buy a company and run it profitably, so that you don't need to put money in THATS A GOOD THING, and I would be a good businessman.

that's how it works.

If I bought a business and had to pump in my savings every few months.... I'd have failed and I'd be bankrupt and a shit business owner

Why do people think football is any different?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top