• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

England v India (2nd test) Lords


Michael Gough is a f*cking cock like. The more I see/hear of him the more that becomes apparent. Why not just complete the over FFS?

Also, why the fuck pick Wood if you aren’t going to bowl him inside the first two hours of play?
 
Steak Pie said:
That was painful to watch, tiptoeing round the subject under pain of the sack. How many different ways can you say the 16.4 is shit and has made life impossible for the players, without saying the 16.4 is shit and has made life impossible for the players?

County games played by reserve teams in out ground is the idea, they are prepared to sacrifice absolutely everything. :lol:
Click to expand...

Sure there's another thread for this, but I think the 16.4 is here to stay and I actually think its been a ridiculous success on its own terms. All the evidence suggests that it really is bringing a different type of audience to the game.

I was very critical of it, hated the concept, still hate the ludicrous ten-ball overs. But the writing is on the wall for the Blast. It's actually f***ing working, much though I hate it.

Of course the calendar is still absurd and the charge that it has fundamentally weakened the England team is undeniable. Why they can't rationalise the season so there are clear white ball and red ball phases - and not give the red ball phases the shitty bits of the calender either - I have no idea. I just don't get it. Tests should be on at the same time as the CC (i.e. summer) and you can have the white ball bits at the end of the season, like they are for England. To me that point stands whether it is the 16.4 or the Blast, or whatever.
 
Last edited:
brandon said:
Michael Gough is a f*cking cock like. The more I see/hear of him the more that becomes apparent. Why not just complete the over FFS?

Also, why the fuck pick Wood if you aren’t going to bowl him inside the first two hours of play?
Click to expand...
For some reason they like to use him with a dead ball when nothing else is happening. essentially he is fodder in home tests
 
scotch said:
Wood averages 40+ in England because he doesnt get the new ball and doesnt get brought on 2nd change either and inevitably bowls at set batsman (just like Stokes does tbf)
Click to expand...
Same with Archer, he was averaging like 20 when he had the new ball in the Ashes and the Anderson/Broad come back to hog it and he goes over 30s.

Not f***ing rocket science.

It also makes them more likely to injure themselves. We don't understand pace bowling at all, we really don't.
 
brandon said:
Michael Gough is a f*cking cock like. The more I see/hear of him the more that becomes apparent. Why not just complete the over FFS?

Also, why the fuck pick Wood if you aren’t going to bowl him inside the first two hours of play?
Click to expand...
Maybe, like me he forgot he was playing :lol:
 
Poor all round after the opening spell. Curran bowling absolute pies and getting carted all over the place. And then even after an over which goes for 16 Wood can’t get on for a bowl. Shocking.
 
Mr Redknapp said:
Maybe, like me he forgot he was playing :lol:
Click to expand...
I'm sitting here getting angrier and angrier about it.

Why do we see pace as a flat pitch, soft ball tactic? No wonder we keep breaking all our pace bowlers?

Robinson is what - third test in and all his success has come as first change.

Total bullshit.
Dexter said:
Poor all round after the opening spell. Curran bowling absolute pies and getting carted all over the place. And then even after an over which goes for 16 Wood can’t get on for a bowl. Shocking.
Click to expand...
Curran has never been a good enough bowler imo.
 
Comeback_Kenwyne said:
Sure there's another thread for this, but I think the 16.4 is here to stay and I actually think its been a ridiculous success on its own terms. All the evidence suggests that it really is bringing a different type of audience to the game.

I was very critical of it, hated the concept, still hate the ludicrous ten-ball overs. But the writing is on the wall for the Blast. It's actually f***ing working, much though I hate it.

Of course the calendar is still absurd and the charge that it has fundamentally weakened the England team is undeniable. Why they can't rationalise the season so there are clear white ball and red ball phases - and not give the red ball phases the shitty bits of the calender either - I have no idea. I just don't get it. Tests should be on at the same time as the CC (i.e. summer) and you can have the white ball bits at the end of the season, like they are for England. To me that point stands whether it is the 16.4 or the Blast, or whatever.
Click to expand...

There is, but this was analysis of the test team on the morning of the test on the test match thread. It's undoubtedly had a negative effect on the test team, the team which props up the entire game. Already. :lol:

Not sure how you can say it's been a success. We've seen more marketing budget thrown at it than (I read) the last 20 years of domestic cricket combined. That's an insane levels of investment. Stupid. And for what? The general consensus that it's just T20 with 5 ball overs.

So more of the same, excluding half the country, for 20 times the price. Absolutely f***ing ridiculous.

Success will be judged in a few years. If this competition is still running and Durham CC is back in the minor counties, then it's been a success.

Anyway, shit morning for England.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top