• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Jofra Archer


Liverpool Beachball said:
Get it postponed
Click to expand...

This. We're looking good for a 5-0 thumping without Stokes or him, alongside the car-crash of a batting line-up.

The Stokes thing is a more serious point. They are demanding too much mentally of cricketers to put them in a secure bubble for four months - that's not right. Can the ashes, until its bubble-free. There'll be a few more like Stokes who feel they can't go on if they proceed. It's not right.
 
Last edited:
Comeback_Kenwyne said:
This. We're looking good for a 5-0 thumping without Stokes or him, alongside the car-crash of a batting line-up.

The Stokes thing is a more serious point. They are demanding too much mentally of cricketers to put them in a secure bubble for four months - that's not right. Can the ashes, until its bubble-free. There'll be a few more like Stokes who feel they can't go on if they proceed. It's not right.
Click to expand...
Agreed
 
hudson88 said:
Puts massive pressure on Wood’s fitness now mine, especially with Olly Stone injured too.
Click to expand...
Yeah true. Might mean he gets a fairer crack at the whip, mind, then again they’ll probably just have Curran and Overton bowling military medium and then wonder why the Aussies are 500-5.
 
Last edited:
brandon said:
Yeah true. Might mean he gets a fairer crack at the whip, mind, then again they’ll probably just have Curran and Overton bowling military medium and then wonder why the Aussies are 500-5.
Click to expand...

Almost as if the selection is predictable isn’t it
 
Comeback_Kenwyne said:
With respect, personally think this is utter bollocks.
Click to expand...
Fair enough, everyone is entitled to their opinion.

Wood is quicker despite the hype that surrounds Archer and I’ve just always been left so disappointed and unerwhelmed by Archer in Test cricket. Couple of spells against the Aussies two years ago were sensational, but unfortunately it seems like the norm is where he just shuffles in and bowls 82mph and that’s no use to anyone.
 
brandon said:
Fair enough, everyone is entitled to their opinion.

Wood is quicker despite the hype that surrounds Archer and I’ve just always been left so disappointed and unerwhelmed by Archer in Test cricket. Couple of spells against the Aussies two years ago were sensational, but unfortunately it seems like the norm is where he just shuffles in and bowls 82mph and that’s no use to anyone.
Click to expand...
Get the sense that Lords was his peak in regards to pace with all the hype and adrenalin, Headingley were he got into a rhythm and bowled nice and full in perfect seam bowling conditions and since then has found bowling quick too tough on his body (and been bowled into injury by Root no doubt)
 
brandon said:
Fair enough, everyone is entitled to their opinion.

Wood is quicker despite the hype that surrounds Archer and I’ve just always been left so disappointed and unerwhelmed by Archer in Test cricket. Couple of spells against the Aussies two years ago were sensational, but unfortunately it seems like the norm is where he just shuffles in and bowls 82mph and that’s no use to anyone.
Click to expand...
I know he's a local hero, but I haven't in all honesty seen anything from Wood at test level. He's looked as ordinary as his stats say he is.

Archer, aye, has underwhelmed after that incredible Ashes debut. He's a better white ball bowler than Wood for me.

Both, perhaps unsurprisingly, are better with the white ball.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top