• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Put a flat earthier into space


How often do you see your mars go the opposite way when you view it through your telescope?
When I look at Mars, it's actually quite hard to align the telescope to point to it, so I use the internet to tell me where it will be in our sky at a certain time.

It's always there at the right place.

If you plot that position on paper you can see it relate perfectly to the orbits.

So just to clarify, it doesn't actually stop and go the other direction, it just appears to because of the different orbits.
 
That are getting answered, however when you are asked questions you spout an absolute load of rubbish. Like I said, I hope you are just on a wind up as I fear for humanity if there people that stupid out there :lol:
I'm asking questions. Just ignore me and you won't get wound up.
Anyone who does not want to answer my questions are free not to do so. Anyone who wants to ignore me, feel free.
If you want to spout abuse then also feel free.
If you want to spend your time calling me a wum and all the rest of the stuff...also fine.

My advice for your own sake, so you don;t get so wound up, is to ignore me and deal with whoever you feel is worth your time.

Best I can offer.
When I look at Mars, it's actually quite hard to align the telescope to point to it, so I use the internet to tell me where it will be in our sky at a certain time.

It's always there at the right place.

If you plot that position on paper you can see it relate perfectly to the orbits.

So just to clarify, it doesn't actually stop and go the other direction, it just appears to because of the different orbits.
Ok, no problem.
 
I'm not sure about an ant farm or the likes, more like cells among similar cells of a bigger organism, maybe.
Basically.

Just think of a lot of Earth like cells in a liquid of whatever make up that is.
Cells close together but impossible for us to see due to our vision not being capable of seeing past the inner membrane which acts like a mirror against the outer dark liquid that we get told is a vacuum of space...which, if you really think about it, is impossible in itself regardless of my thoughts on Earth.

Internet bully.

Your "mirror" theory doesn't work due to the way reflections work. We've spoken about this before on another thread, but there's no way to explain the movement of the stars in the night sky in different places on Earth using your reflections theory, whereas by some strange coincidence the movement can be absolutely perfectly explained with ZERO factor of error if Earth is indeed an oblate spheroid. Weird that.
 
I'm asking questions. Just ignore me and you won't get wound up.
Anyone who does not want to answer my questions are free not to do so. Anyone who wants to ignore me, feel free.
If you want to spout abuse then also feel free.
If you want to spend your time calling me a wum and all the rest of the stuff...also fine.

My advice for your own sake, so you don;t get so wound up, is to ignore me and deal with whoever you feel is worth your time.

Best I can offer.

Ok, no problem.
That is an excellent post and I recommend people follow it.
 
I'm not sure about an ant farm or the likes, more like cells among similar cells of a bigger organism, maybe.
Basically.

Just think of a lot of Earth like cells in a liquid of whatever make up that is.
Cells close together but impossible for us to see due to our vision not being capable of seeing past the inner membrane which acts like a mirror against the outer dark liquid that we get told is a vacuum of space...which, if you really think about it, is impossible in itself regardless of my thoughts on Earth.

Internet bully.
Why don't you report me then? And how is it bullying to call someone condescending.
 
If you look level over a curve then your second mile is not going to be the same as your first from your immediate vantage point.
Look it up, t doesn't come from flat Earthers.

It basically is. Our so called universe.
What we see is told to us as being our universe but what we see is all inside the cell we are in. In my opinion of course.
I've tried but wasn't finding anything I could make sense of.
 
Your "mirror" theory doesn't work due to the way reflections work. We've spoken about this before on another thread, but there's no way to explain the movement of the stars in the night sky in different places on Earth using your reflections theory, whereas by some strange coincidence the movement can be absolutely perfectly explained with ZERO factor of error if Earth is indeed an oblate spheroid. Weird that.
It can be explained because the so called oblate spheroid is caked in all kinds of magical mysteries to get it to work.
You follow that train of thought like I did, once upon a time.

The massive amount of questions and the obscure answers that cannot be verified and people accept it because it's schooled from young to old age.
Just my opinion and I have absolutely no issue with what anyone believes. I simply have my own thoughts.
That is an excellent post and I recommend people follow it.
I'd like to think they will.
 
Your "mirror" theory doesn't work due to the way reflections work. We've spoken about this before on another thread, but there's no way to explain the movement of the stars in the night sky in different places on Earth using your reflections theory, whereas by some strange coincidence the movement can be absolutely perfectly explained with ZERO factor of error if Earth is indeed an oblate spheroid. Weird that.
Only vaguely knowing who Johannes Kepler was ashamed me, a bloke in his late 50s.

worked out orbits were elliptical whilst his mother was being tried for witchcraft.
 
Last edited:
It can be explained because the so called oblate spheroid is caked in all kinds of magical mysteries to get it to work.
You follow that train of thought like I did, once upon a time.

The massive amount of questions and the obscure answers that cannot be verified and people accept it because it's schooled from young to old age.
Just my opinion and I have absolutely no issue with what anyone believes. I simply have my own thoughts.
What? No it doesn't! It's basic motion and only involves someone looking upwards at night for a period of time to see it working.

You can observe yourself the stars making an apparent path across the sky centred around a polar point in the northern and southern hemispheres (however you want to describe them - I know you don't believe in such things, so let's say using your model of the world, "somewhere close to the centre of the world like Britain" and "somewhere far away from the centre of the world, like Australia" as being places that I'm referring to when I'm saying "northern hemisphere" and "southern hemisphere")...

...and if you're near the equator, the stars appear to go across the sky in a straight path instead (again, when I'm talking about "a place on the equator", replace that text using your model with "a place midway between the middle of the world and the outer rim of the world, such as The Sahara").

There are NOT "a massive amount of questions that cannot be verified" in the slightest. It's nothing to do with schooling, brainwashing or any other such conspiracy theorist bullshit, it's verifiable science that any schoolchild can perform in their own back garden and think "oh yeah, that's pretty obvious really".

There are no "magical mysteries" as you put it, which is exactly what you would need for it to be some weird kind of convoluted array of mirrors that every person has orbiting them personally but invisibly to produce the result of what you or I can see in the sky every night.
 
Last edited:
He already has answered and you cant understand it. Thats your fault, no one else's. You are either unable to comprehend what people are saying or on a total wind up.
It’s fairly obvious he’s on a wind up.
I have this theory that he’s a 45 year old bloke still living with his mam in a two bedroom flat above a laundromat in Dunston. He’s never had the pleasure of a lady, weighs somewhere in the region of 30 stone, lives off oven pizza which his mam brings into his bedroom which he never leaves. He leaves the crusts which get fed to the dog who, because @Nukehasslefan is mildly agoraphobic doesn’t get walked and therefore shits all over the kitchen/dining/living area.
His mam, 76 years old who is on the NHS waiting list for a double hip replacement and walks with two sticks has to pick up the shit when the smell gets too much because he won’t as he struggles to bend over due to the size of his gut. The smell doesn’t bother him at all due to his own body odour being so much worse. This will be compounded by the stench emanating from his bedroom that he has set up as his own little wank palace, the floor of which is covered with wank socks that even though he lives above the laundromat never see the inside of a washing machine. His main ‘turn on’ for his mastabatory sessions revolve around French midget porn but when he gets bored with that he comes onto the SMB where threads like this serve to fill those socks with semen in much the same way.
Like I said, it’s a theory. It may be true or it may not be but it’s as good as any other.
 
What? No it doesn't! It's basic motion and only involves someone looking upwards at night for a period of time to see it working.

You can observe yourself the stars making an apparent path across the sky centred around a polar point in the northern and southern hemispheres (however you want to describe them - I know you don't believe in such things, so let's say using your model of the world, "somewhere close to the centre of the world like Britain" and "somewhere far away from the centre of the world, like Australia" as being places that I'm referring to when I'm saying "northern hemisphere" and "southern hemisphere")...

...and if you're near the equator, the stars appear to go across the sky in a straight path instead (again, when I'm talking about "a place on the equator", replace that text using your model with "a place midway between the middle of the world and the outer rim of the world, such as The Sahara").

There are NOT "a massive amount of questions that cannot be verified" in the slightest. It's nothing to do with schooling, brainwashing or any other such conspiracy theorist bullshit, it's verifiable science that any schoolchild can perform in their own back garden and think "oh yeah, that's pretty obvious really".

There are no "magical mysteries" as you put it, which is exactly what you would need for it to be some weird kind of convoluted array of mirrors that every person has orbiting them personally but invisibly to produce the result of what you or I can see in the sky every night.
And you're welcome to your thoughts and acceptance of the model you go with.

I don't believe a word of it from the storytellers.
 
And you're welcome to your thoughts and acceptance of the model you go with.

I don't believe a word of it from the storytellers.

It's not a case of "acceptance of a model" or "storytellers", it's a case of "look up in the sky... oh yeah, now I can see" and "look at how mirrors or prisms work, oh yeah, now I see".

Your proposal is impossible without the use of some weird kind of all-powerful magic that distorts the way we all observe the sky at night.

And that's just ONE of ENDLESS different examples that can be presented that can be absolutely perfectly explained for an oblate spheroid world with simple observation and sub-GCSE maths, that cannot be explained by non-magical means if the world is ANY OTHER SHAPE.

If you disagree, show us your working.

Show us your maths that explains it.
Show us your diagrams.
Show us your map of the world.
Show us ANYTHING that backs up your theory and disproves ours.

All you've ever done on this forum is stick your fingers in your ears at all our irrefutable proofs and say "LA LA LA NOT LISTENING, YOU BELIEVE THAT DELUDED BRAINWASHED STORYTELLER STUFF THAT YOU WANT TO BELIEVE AND I'LL BELIEVE THE TRUTH".

I struggle to believe that you're genuinely as thick as the persona you portray yourself as on this forum. You absolutely HAVE to be on a wind-up.
 
Last edited:
And you're welcome to your thoughts and acceptance of the model you go with.

I don't believe a word of it from the storytellers.
You mean the qualified scientists who have studied this kind of thing for years? Compared to the absolute fantasy scenario you have come up with in your head. You absolute clown :lol:
 
Back
Top