Luna17
Striker
Lets examine this much talked about (by mags) so called golden period of skunk fc between 1992 and 2005.
Money was no object, and so one would expect, a few trophies and at least euro qualification every season would occur ? Errrr, not quite.
Lets not forget in 91/92, this huge club took until the second last game of that season to avoid relegation to tier 3.
92/93 saw the spending begin and Keegans team gained promotion as champions, not a big surprise given their financial muscle.
93/94 tbf was fairly unbelievable as they finished 3rd in their first season back in the top tier since relegation in 88/89. Big signings like Quasimodo helped, and lets not forget, Hall/Shepherd's wealth rivalled or swamped that of all the so called big boys.
94/95 ? An early ko in the uefa cup to bilbao, no Lc or fa cup, and a 6th placed finish meaning no europe next season. How could that happen given their big money signings . 6th ffs.
95/96 saw them blow the title, win no cups, but they did qualify for europe.
96/97 saw KK pack in early January but dogleash steadied the ship and they finished second again. Again, no cups and knocked out by monaco in uefa cup.This time, finishing second meant champs league qualification which they cocked up in the qualification stage to dynamo zagreb.
97/98 ? Finished 13th, just four points off relegation. Yes 13th. They did manage an fa cup final appearance courtesy of a piss easy run but were crushed by Arsenal.
98/99 - finished 13th again, 5 points off relegation. Another piss easy run to an fa cup final and another embarrassing defeat.
99/00 - oh dear. Finished 11th BELOW 7th placed "minnow" Safc. How could that be with Englands top striker Alan Shearer upfront ? Well, a blip, wont happen again. No cups. Sbr answered call to save them from relegation after nasty Ruud upset "big al".
00/01. Another 11th placed finish, 4 places below "little old Safc. No cups.
02/03 and 03/04 saw 3rd and 5th place under sbr, euro qualification but no cups.
04/05 and a 14th placed , yes 14th placed finish. No cups and an igniminious end to sbr's reign.
Well, if that is a golden age, I can see fans of Man U, Chelsea, Liverpool, Leeds, Ipswich, Forest, Derby, Villa, Arsenal, Spurs and Man City having a right good laugh.
The mags will say "but we played great footy (well for the 3 seasons in the PL under kk maybe, ) and played in europe", but no trophies and some bottom half of the table finishes are a pathetic return on the vast amounts of money paid out for sheerah, ferdinand, ginola, asprilla, peacock, batty, barton etc.
And, they will never ever mention (they wont even know, as its a FACT and they dont deal in FACTS) that their longest consecutive run in the top tier is a paltry 33 seasons compared to our 58 which to my knowledge is only bettered by 2 clubs at this present time.
Dont let this mag myth of golden years become fact as its very very far from that.
FTBM now and forever.
Money was no object, and so one would expect, a few trophies and at least euro qualification every season would occur ? Errrr, not quite.
Lets not forget in 91/92, this huge club took until the second last game of that season to avoid relegation to tier 3.
92/93 saw the spending begin and Keegans team gained promotion as champions, not a big surprise given their financial muscle.
93/94 tbf was fairly unbelievable as they finished 3rd in their first season back in the top tier since relegation in 88/89. Big signings like Quasimodo helped, and lets not forget, Hall/Shepherd's wealth rivalled or swamped that of all the so called big boys.
94/95 ? An early ko in the uefa cup to bilbao, no Lc or fa cup, and a 6th placed finish meaning no europe next season. How could that happen given their big money signings . 6th ffs.
95/96 saw them blow the title, win no cups, but they did qualify for europe.
96/97 saw KK pack in early January but dogleash steadied the ship and they finished second again. Again, no cups and knocked out by monaco in uefa cup.This time, finishing second meant champs league qualification which they cocked up in the qualification stage to dynamo zagreb.
97/98 ? Finished 13th, just four points off relegation. Yes 13th. They did manage an fa cup final appearance courtesy of a piss easy run but were crushed by Arsenal.
98/99 - finished 13th again, 5 points off relegation. Another piss easy run to an fa cup final and another embarrassing defeat.
99/00 - oh dear. Finished 11th BELOW 7th placed "minnow" Safc. How could that be with Englands top striker Alan Shearer upfront ? Well, a blip, wont happen again. No cups. Sbr answered call to save them from relegation after nasty Ruud upset "big al".
00/01. Another 11th placed finish, 4 places below "little old Safc. No cups.
02/03 and 03/04 saw 3rd and 5th place under sbr, euro qualification but no cups.
04/05 and a 14th placed , yes 14th placed finish. No cups and an igniminious end to sbr's reign.
Well, if that is a golden age, I can see fans of Man U, Chelsea, Liverpool, Leeds, Ipswich, Forest, Derby, Villa, Arsenal, Spurs and Man City having a right good laugh.
The mags will say "but we played great footy (well for the 3 seasons in the PL under kk maybe, ) and played in europe", but no trophies and some bottom half of the table finishes are a pathetic return on the vast amounts of money paid out for sheerah, ferdinand, ginola, asprilla, peacock, batty, barton etc.
And, they will never ever mention (they wont even know, as its a FACT and they dont deal in FACTS) that their longest consecutive run in the top tier is a paltry 33 seasons compared to our 58 which to my knowledge is only bettered by 2 clubs at this present time.
Dont let this mag myth of golden years become fact as its very very far from that.
FTBM now and forever.