• The forum upgrades are now largely complete.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Takeover News/Rumours - Part 42

Status
Not open for further replies.

This Nixon?

He does seem to have been closest to the mark for some time IMO.
i posted wrongly that Nixon i claimed from the Chronical has written a piece about the scum before our breaking news on the investment.
Well it seems i got wrong, in fact Nixon was given info from an insider in the club and he passed that info to a journo who DOES write for the chronicle.
Nixon has once again tried to belittle our great and proud club. well he can F right off.
Is this you, Bob?
oh yes it is,
 
Last edited:
Have they not used up the FPP loan to cover the losses rather than their own pocket? The maths works out about right if we are losing £1m per month as Rodwell stated.

That loan will have started to be used from the day it landed in the club after the share issue a year ago (£9m). I'm not sure whether Nixon is mixing up the dollar and sterling values of the loan (the charge document refers to $12m, which was c.£9m at the time. That could well have been insufficient to cover everything,
 
i posted wrongly that Nixon i claimed from the Chronical has written a piece about the scum before our breaking news on the investment.
Well it seems i got wrong, in fact Nixon was given info from an insider in the club and he passed that info to a journo who DOES write for the chronicle.
Nixon has once again tried to belittle our great and proud club. well he can F right off.

oh yes it is,

How certain are you it will be announced this week mate?
 
That loan will have started to be used from the day it landed in the club after the share issue a year ago (£9m). I'm not sure whether Nixon is mixing up the dollar and sterling values of the loan (the charge document refers to $12m, which was c.£9m at the time. That could well have been insufficient to cover everything,
I think maybe the figure he quoted includes interest and early repayment charges.
 
Have they not used up the FPP loan to cover the losses rather than their own pocket? The maths works out about right if we are losing £1m per month as Rodwell stated.
Problem is, the club paid out over half the amount of that loans worth on another, non-Covid related issue recently, which was nothing to do with the current owners but they foot the bill. But people won’t know it until probably the accounts come out.
 
So you’d like to see a fellow Sunderland fan banned from the stadium, just because he’s questioning our inept owners?
@Red and white TID, and all other supporters, care more for this club than your ‘mates’ ever have or ever will.
ian its not that, its the fact he named Jim and the initials of 2 others, without knowing what was said, then staff started to believe what ended up in a paper.
It was totally untrue.
 
Gaz with respect these 3 have funded the club over the last 8 month out of their own pocket.
I am not sticking up for their cockups and failings but CM is not in their league but has stumped up more than his share.

Sorry but i don’t believe or trust any of them now and i never will. Be interesting to see just how much they've all lost if a deal happens, as i suspect the parachute money & FFP loan has gone a long way to covering costs
 
the £1 million is based on loads of variations, we are doing better than most due to SAFSEE helping the coffers, thats after giving shit loads away to little clubs
Aye I'm sure it'll vary month to month so it sounds like a ball park figure mate. Nevertheless all logic would suggest the credit facility that FPP provided Madrox is what has been covering the losses so far.
 
ian its not that, its the fact he named Jim and the initials of 2 others, without knowing what was said, then staff started to believe what ended up in a paper.
It was totally untrue.

It’s not that. It’s your constant backing of them over our loyal supporters and the good of our club.
Maybe one day you’ll realise what they were really about.
 
i posted wrongly that Nixon i claimed from the Chronical has written a piece about the scum before our breaking news on the investment.
Well it seems i got wrong, in fact Nixon was given info from an insider in the club and he passed that info to a journo who DOES write for the chronicle.
Nixon has once again tried to belittle our great and proud club. well he can F right off.

oh yes it is,

Nixon called the share distribution spot on in July/august. He’s got others bits spot on too. He’s got nothing to do with Chronicle, and he said that himself

perhaps the current owners don’t like him because he reported the truth on a few occasions that they didn’t like. They also allegedly threatened to sue him which didn’t seem to happen
 
i posted wrongly that Nixon i claimed from the Chronical has written a piece about the scum before our breaking news on the investment.
Well it seems i got wrong, in fact Nixon was given info from an insider in the club and he passed that info to a journo who DOES write for the chronicle.
Nixon has once again tried to belittle our great and proud club. well he can F right off.

oh yes it is,

As much as you're barmy bob, you were the only chap to say it was just shares moving about as far as I can remember.
 
Eh no they cant, they cant come out and say it is someone who has nothing to do with the club sa ked the manager

Yes they can :lol:

Why can't they? Donald get whoever he wants to appoint the manager, he owns it.

Strange post

He could even hire you to do it if he wanted
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top