• The forum upgrades are now largely complete.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Takeover News/Rumours

Status
Not open for further replies.

Will the new situation when it happens see Sartori, Methven snd Donald have over 51% of the overall shareholding, meaning they will have the final say on all major decisions/appointments?
Discuss.
 
I've heard hints that things were further along than the Guardian said. You don't get the kind of reportage we've seen there or in L'Équipe unless things are near completion. The idea that you'd get those kinds of announcements if DD was ongoing is farcical.

Don't know anything about finance side of this, but I do know about the press and you are right in this case.

Any NDAs signed were so watertight too - nothing substantial leaked. The Guardian were clearly briefed by the principals. The other papers picked up the scraps from the Guardian. The Times got their stuff from another source with an axe to grind - hence details allover the place. That Times piece would never have been printed without the Guardian one though, so we can take that as the original official source, allowing for more speculative "The Times understands" type stuff.

Tbc - none of this is ITK, as if I'm f***ing ITK. Just educated guesswork based on some insider knowledge of how papers work/stories are built.
 
Last edited:
Norwich who have a very very successful academy do it very differently. They play 4 4 2 all the way up to U23s. All because attacking players fetch a premium and if you play two up top in youth football you're more likely to produce a striker with good sell on value whilst still potentially producing one to keep. Its their 4th year of doing it now and they have 1 in their first team squad. Going with a philosophy from top to bottom is a wonderful idea but whilst knocking around the lower echlons of the football league we need to cut pur cloth accordingly.
That’s in interesting approach. However it’s also similar thinking to why I’d go for a flexible 4-3-3. It’s also easier to introduce players to ‘the next level’ in a midfield or forward 3 imo. More protection alongside.
 
It's also the best formation.
I actually think that 3-4-3 is the best way to play - just not the horrendous version that Parky plays. Would be perfectly happy with 4-3-3 though.
It is but ,ive said this a lot lately what are ya doing with Hume.He is the best we have at getting us on the front foot but cant play in a 4
He could so long as you have a bit more of a stay-at-home right back. Put Sanderson - a mobile centre half naturally - there and you’d be able to get the right balance.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top