@KittenMittens
Yeah exactly. In hindsight, we can all see that was them trying to deter others from vocalising any suspicions that something was amiss. Equally, I understand Roger and co taking that at face value this time last year.
Classic PR tactic.
Interesting thread on an Oxford forum I just found while scanning for his DM 'lawsuit' that never existed btw, see if you can spot Charlie
And something else I notice:
Interesting that Charlie was on the arse end of a deal at Oxford that ended up with them owing some of their future income to the outgoing owner, but then set up a deal with us that sent a proportion of future income to the outgoing owner...
It's a good trick if you can pull it off!
Yeah exactly. In hindsight, we can all see that was them trying to deter others from vocalising any suspicions that something was amiss. Equally, I understand Roger and co taking that at face value this time last year.
Classic PR tactic.
Interesting thread on an Oxford forum I just found while scanning for his DM 'lawsuit' that never existed btw, see if you can spot Charlie
You must be logged on to see external links
His spelling has improved!And something else I notice:
Interesting that Charlie was on the arse end of a deal at Oxford that ended up with them owing some of their future income to the outgoing owner, but then set up a deal with us that sent a proportion of future income to the outgoing owner...
It's a good trick if you can pull it off!