• The forum upgrades are now largely complete.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

William Storey

Status
Not open for further replies.
He aint going away and there is probably a very good reason why

Because he can only win from this shite. Google his name 3 weeks ago and he was a public joke. Now he's parlayed what looks like a phantom bid into people tugging themselves off over his beard and a Google search that has references to blue chip investors, £100m businesses and £37m takeovers of football clubs.
 

Because he can only win from this shite. Google his name 3 weeks ago and he was a public joke. Now he's parlayed what looks like a phantom bid into people tugging themselves off over his beard and a Google search that has references to blue chip investors, £100m businesses and £37m takeovers of football clubs.

He has had a bid accepted to buy the club. If the other bid "falls away" he has a very strong chance of being our next owner
 
Jfc, imagine if we got this charlatan after the charlatan we have now.
Storey, if you're reading this, you should buy Newcastle. They are a FAR BIGGER CLUB FOR YOU! Really. Honestly. Despite hating them, I'm saying this. You should buy them. Arabs should buy us because we're a small club and EFL won't check. Honestly.
 


Yes i know about Blackpool.
My point is, did they act as unprofessional as Storey before the takeover.
Did they state they were going to ignore/bend rules once they were in charge ?

I have serious doubts about Storey, I think he is a fantasist.
There are many unscrupulous owners without a pot to pìss in just like the recent Wigan debacle.

Then there are the mags 😁
 
I don't see how it can be Storey, surely you don't do deals for football clubs and tweet about it 6 times a day?

Surely you're quiet until the deals done? I mean even SD and CM were and they loved the attention (until they were found out).

The group who have exclusivity are meant to have an NDA in place yet this cretin can't/won't keep his gob shut. No chance that it's his group who have had a bid accepted.
 
So you can't answer the questions I've asked then?

I agree there's plenty of dodgy things out there which make me dubious but again you've exaggerated evidence that supports your view and dismissed the parts that don't.

How can he be facing a winding up order if there's zero proof of his businesses? When was the winding up order issued?

Why hasn't Mickey Gray identified his backers? That's not a requisite of any takeover at this stage.

He's sponsored Super bikes which means he's shown them funds. Haas also confirmed that they did their due diligence so he had funds to sponsor them.

I really don't see the point in ignoring half of the story. I agree he's probably not a legitimate buyer. His business dealings are mysterious. But there is evidence of money there to provide sponsorship (no idea how much) which you're completely ignoring and dismissing with no evidence.
I said he was facing a winding up order, not that one had been issued. You can’t prove he has funds just as much as I can’t prove he hasn’t , but based on what happened with HAAS and the fact there’s no proof he is a successful businessman its reasonable to assume he doesnt have a pot to piss in. I don’t even know if a Micky Gray involved bid is being considered and haven’t expressed a view on it anyway. How can you agree he’s probably not a legitimate buyer if you believe what you’ve posted, it makes zero sense.
 
I said he was facing a winding up order, not that one had been issued. You can’t prove he has funds just as much as I can’t prove he hasn’t , but based on what happened with HAAS and the fact there’s no proof he is a successful businessman its reasonable to assume he doesnt have a pot to piss in. I don’t even know if a Micky Gray involved bid is being considered and haven’t expressed a view on it anyway. How can you agree he’s probably not a legitimate buyer if you believe what you’ve posted, it makes zero sense.

What happened with Haas is that they did due diligence. Unless you're also declaring them incompetent then it isn't at all reasonable to reach the conclusion you have.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top