I didn’t say you did. I said some had which they have.I have not criticised them, you are just making things up.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I didn’t say you did. I said some had which they have.I have not criticised them, you are just making things up.
I have not criticised them, you are just making things up.
They were always going to kick on man. Did you seriously think we were going to keep going at 2 an over until close?They starting to kick on now, so fair enough, just would liked to have a go at them tonight, and could have, I am treating this as day 4 of the match not day 3, always good to have a few overs at the opposition before the last day in this situation.
Nobody on the thread has mentioned gung ho, just a few people on the thread and the guys commented on Sky have suggested correctly imo, the rate should have be higher and a bit more positive.
Once again the whole point is they may be only 4 left, however like I said all a bit irrelevant as reckon we will easily.
They were always going to kick on man. Did you seriously think we were going to keep going at 2 an over until close?
These are a decent attack, blunt them then make hay. Been really good sensible test cricket.
Read the thread and you’ll see a lot of criticism. If you want to interpret that as slagging off then that’s up to you.He slags people off for "saying" things he has made up.
Must stop confusing the voices in your head with what people are actually saying old chap![]()
They were always going to kick on man. Did you seriously think we were going to keep going at 2 an over until close?
These are a decent attack, blunt them then make hay. Been really good sensible test cricket.
What silly talk? It’s a difference of opinion, mine just happens to be the right one.Okay, stop this silly talk, let's go for something else, would you declare today and put them in for a bit before close?
I personally would.
Think we will win regardless mind.
Read the thread and you’ll see a lot of criticism. If you want to interpret that as slagging off then that’s up to you.
Seems we all agree now that that we are in a great position which justifies the platform set by Burns and Sibley.
What silly talk? It’s a difference of opinion, mine just happens to be the right one.
If we get 400 on then I’d have a dip at them yes.
Get rolled for 150 by going silly then we could very well have lost the game or made things more uncomfortable than necessary.No just thought we were nearly 200 ahead when we started so were never ever going to lose the game imo, and thought because of the healthy lead and forecast we could have scored a bit quicker to give ourselves as much time as possible to win the game, a positive mentality.
We are scoring at over 3 an over. Ends has justified the means.Your opinion of batting really slowly to reach a target of 400 by lunch Tuesday is not the right one.
Get rolled for 150 by going silly then we could very well have lost the game or made things more uncomfortable than necessary.
We are going to be 400 on by end. I really don’t understand what more people wanted.
Get rolled for 150 by going silly then we could very well have lost the game or made things more uncomfortable than necessary.
Get rolled for 150 by going silly then we could very well have lost the game or made things more uncomfortable than necessary.
Going round in circles. We are going at over 3 an over and are going to be 400+ on At end of play.NOBODY HAS SAID WE SHOULD HAVE COME OUT PLAYING LIKE IT'S A 20/20
Key word.NOBODY HAS SAID WE SHOULD HAVE COME OUT PLAYING LIKE IT'S A 20/20
Also 150 runs is probably enough to win this match anyway
Who did I slag off? Stop being such a fanny.Isn't it odd that these threads have been chilled and friendly....then Jardine arrives and immediately starts slagging people off.
Who did I slag off? Stop being such a fanny.
I am now As you’re being a fanny I wasn’t before though.@Mrjardine, answer my question, do you put them in now or bat till the close?
Looks like you are slagging me off there