Roker Mackem
Striker
King of Saudi in hospital ill. MBS is next in line....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What does that change? Not being arsey but dies that alter anything??King of Saudi in hospital ill. MBS is next in line....
New king iircWhat does that change? Not being arsey but dies that alter anything??
Cheers for clearing that upNew king iirc
not in regard to the take over no.What does that change? Not being arsey but dies that alter anything??
Has it gone tits up yet?
But he is a celebrity. He’s a celebrity in his own headwhy the hell has Steve frigging wraith got a blue tick !??!?!?!he's not a celebrity, or famous etc
You on tic toc?You must be logged on to see external links
ALL true.
Is Disney Sharia compliant?I assume the PIF only invests in Shariah compliant investments ..... and the association with a gambling firm surely makes NUFC non-compliant.
Logon or register to see this image
What do they do that would not be?You on tic toc?
Is Disney Sharia compliant?
You say with great authority "considering how heavily they are invested in banking" but then have zero substance to back it up. As it happens PIF Have small holding in BoA, Citigroup and Berkshire Hathaway. The list of rules governing which stocks are Shariah Compliant and which are not are very complex and these definitely are not. I doubt they would buy a direct stake in a gambling firm and as the sponsorship will be less than 5% of turnover it would not prevent them investing in NUFC. Though it would be pretty embarrassing for the "Saudi PL team" to be sponsored by a gambling company.couldn't tell you, I thought in all of the guff I have read about the take over in the last few months that i read they bought into a couple of American banks along with a cruise company and Disney and a few others, I might be mistaken though, not something i have a interest in so it probably just went in one ear and out the other.
Didn't Qatar or UAE have some sort of buy in a loan agreement with Barclays as well, was that not what the Staveley court case is about? again I may well be wrong there, just stuff floating around the back of my head someplace.
Actually you are right - 10.48% of income was from interest, which makes it non-compliant.What do they do that would not be?
Strange Andy, isnt there something about gambling companies being banned as shirt sponsors some time this year?
He heard a well known fan would be appointed to the board and he’s throwing everything at it.
What do they do that would not be?
Agreed @cheeses of nazereth do your thing. Open goal right here.Could do with a few Cheeses classics to highlight the points made