• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

June to July 2020 - NUFC

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sima said:
:lol:

Took longer than I thought. Care to stay on topic? Nah, you’ve got nowt else to offer so you’re banging this drum again.

Tedious. Just proves how utterly limited you are.

Still, you might get the likes you’re hunting for.
Click to expand...

Fuck off ya sad twat
 

Sima said:
:lol:

Took longer than I thought. Care to stay on topic? Nah, you’ve got nowt else to offer so you’re banging this drum again.

Tedious. Just proves how utterly limited you are.

Still, you might get the likes you’re hunting for.
Click to expand...

Says the bloke who deliberately derails safc threads by inserting a nufc comment which usually has nowt to do with the thread topic 😂😂😂
 
Banks said:
Says the bloke who deliberately derails safc threads by inserting a nufc comment which usually has nowt to do with the thread topic 😂😂😂
Click to expand...

Ben Alnwick thread? It's just a throwaway comment, man and I in no way expect a discussion on how poor Jak Alnwick was.
 
Last edited:
Sima said:
Right. So not only do you want her to ignore the concerns of her constituents in parliament, you now want her to push her own hypothetical agenda about the running of Newcastle United.

Bearing in mind this is the exact same subject she got hammered for raising in parliament on here.

That about cover it?

Hypocrisy, you say? I don’t know how you even dare tbh.
Click to expand...
Sima said:
:lol:

Took longer than I thought. Care to stay on topic? Nah, you’ve got nowt else to offer so you’re banging this drum again.

Tedious. Just proves how utterly limited you are.

Still, you might get the likes you’re hunting for.
Click to expand...
Wow! What a post to come online too. Do you honestly believe I am bad mouthing you to get “likes”?
Why don’t you man up and tell Andy H and Julio what exactly you did to a fellow poster from here rather than evading the issue?

Limited I might be, but I have principles, maybe it would do you good to find some yourself from somewhere.

Anyway, back on topic, imo Staveley hasn’t a cat in hells chance of winning her appeal, and if she loses it would she fail the fit and proper persons, or would that not apply.

Finally, please no likes, Sima won’t like it
 
4everredandwhite said:
Wow! What a post to come online too. Do you honestly believe I am bad mouthing you to get “likes”?
Why don’t you man up and tell Andy H and Julio what exactly you did to a fellow poster from here rather than evading the issue?

Limited I might be, but I have principles, maybe it would do you good to find some yourself from somewhere.

Anyway, back on topic, imo Staveley hasn’t a cat in hells chance of winning her appeal, and if she loses it would she fail the fit and proper persons, or would that not apply.

Finally, please no likes, Sima won’t like it
Click to expand...

It's a civil case not criminal so don't think it would apply
 
4everredandwhite said:
Wow! What a post to come online too. Do you honestly believe I am bad mouthing you to get “likes”?
Why don’t you man up and tell Andy H and Julio what exactly you did to a fellow poster from here rather than evading the issue?

Limited I might be, but I have principles, maybe it would do you good to find some yourself from somewhere.

Anyway, back on topic, imo Staveley hasn’t a cat in hells chance of winning her appeal, and if she loses it would she fail the fit and proper persons, or would that not apply.

Finally, please no likes, Sima won’t like it
Click to expand...

What's the point in going over it again? I covered it months ago and it's odd you repeatedly bring it up to stir.

You can tell them with my explicit permission. Unless you can't remember, like which would be weird seeing as you drone on about it often enough.

And, no, it's not a criminal case so it wouldn't in any way impact on the O&D test as far as I am aware.
 
Last edited:
Playing devil's advocate.

Say Leeds aren't promoted and premier League block takeover. With Stavely being a ripon girl. Could they buy Leeds gets promoted and then nothing the premier League could do as would go via the EFL instead?
 
Banks said:
Playing devil's advocate.

Say Leeds aren't promoted and premier League block takeover. With Stavely being a ripon girl. Could they buy Leeds gets promoted and then nothing the premier League could do as would go via the EFL instead?
Click to expand...

Qataris are interested in Leeds iirc.
 
Sima said:
What's the point in going over it again? I covered it months ago.

You can tell them with my explicit permission. Unless you can't remember, like.

And, no, it's not a criminal case so it wouldn't in any way impact on the O&D test as far as I am aware.
Click to expand...
Of course I can remember it, I can remember exactly what you called her as well, Did you ever apologise to her btw?

The court hearing is riveting, I hope I can find the link again @Sabre Mag
 
Sima said:
Qataris are interested in Leeds iirc.
Click to expand...

Yeah but if pif have unlimited money. Leeds could soon turn into a realistic back door into the premier League.

I doubt promotion would be blocked due to an owner. Worrying thought for toon fans 😉
 
Banks said:
Yeah but if pif have unlimited money. Leeds could soon turn into a realistic back door into the premier League.

I doubt promotion would be blocked due to an owner. Worrying thought for toon fans 😉
Click to expand...

By the same token if we get relegated we'd be an easier 'test' too.
 
4everredandwhite said:
Wow! What a post to come online too. Do you honestly believe I am bad mouthing you to get “likes”?
Why don’t you man up and tell Andy H and Julio what exactly you did to a fellow poster from here rather than evading the issue?

Limited I might be, but I have principles, maybe it would do you good to find some yourself from somewhere.

Anyway, back on topic, imo Staveley hasn’t a cat in hells chance of winning her appeal, and if she loses it would she fail the fit and proper persons, or would that not apply.

Finally, please no likes, Sima won’t like it
Click to expand...
Staveley losing the case will have no bearing on the O&D test, it's not dishonest to think you have a claim and for the judge to rule that you don't.
My guess is they will settle once the legal eagles get a idea of their chances.
stuff like this is a numbers game not a winning game. If Barclays lawyers think they have a 50/50 chance of winning and the claim is 1.7 billion they will offer to settle around the 850 million. If they think they have a 90% chance of winning they will offer to settle around the 170 million. If they think they have a 100% chance of winning they won't make an offer.
Staveleys lawyers will accept or refuse the offer depending on what they see their chances are.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top