• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

March to June 2020 - NEWCASTLE UTD fc

Status
Not open for further replies.

frot said:
It's pretty clear from the outset that probably won't be the case. I doubt they'd be handing over 20% to other parties.

My thinking is that they probably aren't too pleased that their name is so openly out there. I can't imagine that it was leaked by someone who had their best interests at heart.
Click to expand...


It could be that Stavely is taking 10% as payment for brokering the deal, although I think since shes been buzzing around Newcastle since ~ 2017 its debatable.

The Ruebens already own a hefty part of Newcastle land / infrastructure and seem to be rather decent at developing areas / new building projects, and presumably have an already decent relationship with NCC. So if the reports are true and the new owners want to develop the local area it wouldn't be such a bad idea having them on board also.

Of course this is all pie in the sky thinking so fuck kna's really.
 
Grants said:
It could be that Stavely is taking 10% as payment for brokering the deal, although I think since shes been buzzing around Newcastle since ~ 2017 its debatable.

The Ruebens already own a hefty part of Newcastle land / infrastructure and seem to be rather decent at developing areas / new building projects, and presumably have an already decent relationship with NCC. So if the reports are true and the new owners want to develop the local area it wouldn't be such a bad idea having them on board also.

Of course this is all pie in the sky thinking so fuck kna's really.
Click to expand...

10% is a hefty wedge for brokering the deal. If it's a money no object type deal, I don't think it's particularly likely. Staveley is determined and connected. I'm not sure I'd trust her though.

I'm interested to see how it plays out. Still think there's games being played.
 
king of the road said:
Totally agree with you. But when both clubs were in the PL Short was the biggest investor. There aren’t many clubs where the fans are happy with their owners - look at Man U and Arsenal.
Click to expand...

just fact checked this out........Newcastle actually spent more....

2016/17



Safc £37.71m

Nufc £57.83m



2015/16



Safc £59.45m

Nufc £97.12m





2014/15



Safc £20.26m

Nufc £40.52m



2013/14



Safc £30.52m

Nufc £3.42m



2012/13



Safc £34.47m

Nufc £28.77m



2011/12



Safc £25.43m

Nufc £23.58m



2010/11



Safc £26.19m

Nufc £12.58m
 
citybythesea said:
just fact checked this out........Newcastle actually spent more....

2016/17



Safc £37.71m

Nufc £57.83m



2015/16



Safc £59.45m

Nufc £97.12m





2014/15



Safc £20.26m

Nufc £40.52m



2013/14



Safc £30.52m

Nufc £3.42m



2012/13



Safc £34.47m

Nufc £28.77m



2011/12



Safc £25.43m

Nufc £23.58m



2010/11



Safc £26.19m

Nufc £12.58m
Click to expand...
I hope that's NET SPEND, as nothing other than that matters iirc.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top