You forgot the guilty plea
For the very same reason Tommy Robinson was, even though he had done far less than what the BBC has just done, this case the BBC is reporting on is on going, no verdicts passed, yet they jailed Tommy for reporting what was allready in the public domain after guilty verdicts had been passed on those Tommy reported on, But I thought someone supposedly involved in "LAW" would have known that, shows how corrupt the law is though eh!
And you're conveniently ignoring & comparing the two scenarios
How’s your mate enjoying prison?For the very same reason Tommy Robinson was, even though he had done far less than what the BBC has just done, this case the BBC is reporting on is on going, no verdicts passed, yet they jailed Tommy for reporting what was allready in the public domain after guilty verdicts had been passed on those Tommy reported on, But I thought someone supposedly involved in "LAW" would have known that, shows how corrupt the law is though eh!
And you're conveniently ignoring & comparing the two scenarios
For the very same reason Tommy Robinson was, even though he had done far less than what the BBC has just done, this case the BBC is reporting on is on going, no verdicts passed, yet they jailed Tommy for reporting what was allready in the public domain after guilty verdicts had been passed on those Tommy reported on, But I thought someone supposedly involved in "LAW" would have known that, shows how corrupt the law is though eh!
And you're conveniently ignoring & comparing the two scenarios
For the very same reason Tommy Robinson was, even though he had done far less than what the BBC has just done, this case the BBC is reporting on is on going, no verdicts passed, yet they jailed Tommy for reporting what was allready in the public domain after guilty verdicts had been passed on those Tommy reported on, But I thought someone supposedly involved in "LAW" would have known that, shows how corrupt the law is though eh!
And you're conveniently ignoring & comparing the two scenarios
For the very same reason Tommy Robinson was, even though he had done far less than what the BBC has just done, this case the BBC is reporting on is on going, no verdicts passed, yet they jailed Tommy for reporting what was allready in the public domain after guilty verdicts had been passed on those Tommy reported on, But I thought someone supposedly involved in "LAW" would have known that, shows how corrupt the law is though eh!
And you're conveniently ignoring & comparing the two scenarios
No reporting restrictions on this one because they're not linked to another trial.I wonder if the BBC & their reporters are arrested & jailed without due process for breaching "reporting restrictions" , contempt of court or causing anxiety to these "fine gentlemen"
Five men have appeared in court to face 36 charges of child grooming.
Five in court in Nottingham facing 36 child grooming charges
The court heard the charges related to three girls, two aged under 16 and one aged under 18.www.bbc.co.uk
Hamza Shazad, 25, Ansar Ahmed, 29, Mohammed Saeed Ahmed, 20, Waqar Akhtar, 26 and Waqas Akhtar, 24, were granted conditional bail at Nottingham Magistrates' Court.
The court heard the charges related to three girls, two aged under 16 and one aged under 18.
The men were told the next hearing will take place at Nottingham Crown Court on 5 December.
No pleas have yet been entered in the case.
- Mr Shazad, of Ewart Road, Forest Fields, Nottingham, faces 11 charges, including two counts of inciting a girl to engage in sexual activity and one count of possessing an extreme pornographic image portraying a sex act with an animal
- Ansar Ahmed, of Radford Road, Nottingham, faces six charges including one count of meeting a girl under 16 following grooming and causing a girl to engage in sexual activity
- Mohammed Saeed Ahmed, of Vale Crescent South, Nottingham, faces 11 charges including one count of raping a girl
- Waqar Akhtar, of Glentworth Road, Nottingham, faces two charges: one of taking away a child in care and one of removing a child under 16 from a person who had lawful responsibility for them
- Waqas Akhtar, of no fixed abode, faces six charges including two of engaging in sexual activity with a girl
What a dunceFor the very same reason Tommy Robinson was, even though he had done far less than what the BBC has just done, this case the BBC is reporting on is on going, no verdicts passed, yet they jailed Tommy for reporting what was allready in the public domain after guilty verdicts had been passed on those Tommy reported on, But I thought someone supposedly involved in "LAW" would have known that, shows how corrupt the law is though eh!
And you're conveniently ignoring & comparing the two scenarios
Him and his brother post regularly on the Echo FB page. Comical.
Were there any in place when TR was arrested for repeating what the BBC had already published & if so why were the BBC not treated the same??Also the case I've mentioned is still on going, no pleas have been submitted yet so this report could "prejudice" the trial no ?????
For the very same reason Tommy Robinson was, even though he had done far less than what the BBC has just done, this case the BBC is reporting on is on going, no verdicts passed, yet they jailed Tommy for reporting what was allready in the public domain after guilty verdicts had been passed on those Tommy reported on, But I thought someone supposedly involved in "LAW" would have known that, shows how corrupt the law is though eh!
And you're conveniently ignoring & comparing the two scenarios
