• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

SAFC Takeover Latest

Status
Not open for further replies.

Monty is my hero said:
Has there been work done on the South Stand recently?

NR just very confidently stated DD was held up at Newcastle due to safety concerns of their ground, but ours has flown through? If there were concerns about the south stand, then there'd be a hold up I'd expect.
Click to expand...

No idea mate, just saying what I'd read on here a while back - something to do with old pit shafts. Probably bollocks as there's been nowt said since I don't believe.
 
Chizno1 said:
The company that has been registered for the mags potential takeover
Click to expand...
Ah right, thanks.

Is it possible that some Mags have got hold of ours and used it as a template to fake one for themselves? Just that the date format's wrong for a start.

Mind, as others have said, Delaware is commonly used to register US parent companies and i guess there's a chance they'd use the same formation agent/lawyer.

What are people concerned about, that the whole thing's fake? Or that Dell & Co have turned their attentions (back) to Newcastle?
 
Howard the Duck said:
Ah right, thanks.

Is it possible that some Mags have got hold of ours and used it as a template to fake one for themselves? Just that the date format's wrong for a start.

Mind, as others have said, Delaware is commonly used to register US parent companies and i guess there's a chance they'd use the same formation agent/lawyer.

What are people concerned about, that the whole thing's fake? Or that Dell & Co have turned their attentions (back) to Newcastle?
Click to expand...

No it isn't.
 
Helmer said:
No idea mate, just saying what I'd read on here a while back - something to do with old pit shafts. Probably bollocks as there's been nowt said since I don't believe.
Click to expand...

Very likely bollocks. The biggest thing putting anyone off buying Newcastle is the eye-watering asking price! Who wants to pay £300m+ for a club treading water in the league.
 
Howard the Duck said:
Ah right, thanks.

Is it possible that some Mags have got hold of ours and used it as a template to fake one for themselves? Just that the date format's wrong for a start.

Mind, as others have said, Delaware is commonly used to register US parent companies and i guess there's a chance they'd use the same formation agent/lawyer.

What are people concerned about, that the whole thing's fake? Or that Dell & Co have turned their attentions (back) to Newcastle?
Click to expand...

Unlikely I would have thought (the faking it) The date is the US format, month then day then year.

They are a massive registration agent apparently;

You must be logged on to see external links
 
Chizno1 said:
Unlikely I would have thought (the faking it) The date is the US format, month then day then year.

They are a massive registration agent apparently;

You must be logged on to see external links
Click to expand...
I know that, but it still states it should be mmddyyyy. They've got mmdyyyy. My limited experience with Delaware bureaucracy makes me think that could easily be voided by that 'error'. I'm probably wrong though and if it's genuine then obviously it's either not a problem or was missed. Who are the Newcastle investors?
Mackem Tommy said:
Why is our month not 09 then?
Click to expand...
Good point, well made!!!! Ignore all the above.
 
Last edited:
Chizno1 said:
Nothing untoward I would have said;

You must be logged on to see external links
Click to expand...
I work on the US stockmarket, loads of companies are incorporated in Delaware as you say

in fact a quic google tells me -

over 66% of the
You must be logged on to see external links
are
You must be logged on to see external links
in Delaware.
 
I think if that was the case and based off the order of things, we'd know by now. There's enough people on the inside of the DD providers (assuming they'd use the same again) that we'd know if they were at that stage with a different club.
 
Howard the Duck said:
I know that, but it still states it should be mmddyyyy. They've got mmdyyyy. My limited experience with Delaware bureaucracy makes me think that could easily be voided by that 'error'. I'm probably wrong though and if it's genuine then obviously it's either not a problem or was missed.
Click to expand...

Ah righto, sorry I get you now. I don't know anything about company reg in US so you could be right
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top