• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

SAFC Takeover Latest

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sunderlandellight said:
Remember him being on the bench a lot when we only had one sub. Those were the days when you only came off if your leg was hanging off.

Logon or register to see this image
Logon or register to see this image
Click to expand...

Just checked. He made 4 appearances for us, possibly all from the bench. My mind is playing tricks on me as it seemed like he was at the club for a while. In reality, it was probably only a few months.
 
ftm1974 said:
Hope you're right but what are the indications to suggest this?

Why would they be targeting the regeneration of the City of Sunderland when they probably had never heard of it until a few months ago?
Click to expand...
I would have thought by investing in the city's football club it will open lots of doors for them to make money in other ways in the city ie regeneration projects such as Sheepfolds, concerts, american football etc.

A win win for everyone.
 
Last edited:
No7 said:
Why would they talk shite on a daily basis? It's their job
Click to expand...
There is no motive for football journalists for it not to happen or for them to make things up. Local and regionals have too much to lose and the nationals won’t be interested
 
The Pro From Dover said:
Michael Eisner owns Portsmouth. He is the former CEO of Disney. Worth a paltry billion in comparison to Dell and his people.
Click to expand...
But even so
Quote :” internationally succesful businessmen investing a fortune into a community halfway round the world and a club for no financial return makes no sense.”
 
Grumpy Old Man said:
A lot of it is because they actually don't have sources as good as members on here do. So they start by browsing for information, and then could post something bogus to get a reaction which reveals something they didn't know. The timeline of some reporting at the very least suggests they got the information from here.
Click to expand...
Most of them will have very very good sources and will receive off the record info all the time . They just won’t print it .
 
seanwharton said:
Why would they do that ?
Click to expand...
Why wouldn’t they. Plenty of others have been doing it for years. You aren’t suggesting they have any kind of professional integrity or poses a moral compass are you. There was a time when it would have been unthinkable, that was then, this is now mate. There are journalists who have made no secret of their allegiances there is absolutely no reason why they couldn’t log on here and stir the pot.
Or use it as a source.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top